The Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Benjamin Kalu, has dismissed claims suggesting that the National Assembly is deliberately slowing down the amendment process of the Electoral Act 2022. Kalu made this clarification on Friday at his country home in Bende, located in Bende Local Government Area of Abia State, while addressing questions from journalists during a media interaction. His comments came shortly after former Vice President and the 2023 presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar, raised concerns over the pace of legislative action on the Electoral Act amendment. In a post shared on his X (formerly Twitter) account on Thursday, Atiku accused the National Assembly of intentionally delaying the amendment process. According to him, such delays could be interpreted as a calculated attempt to weaken the credibility and integrity of the 2027 general elections. Reacting to the allegation, Kalu firmly rejected the claim, insisting that the accusation does not reflect the true position of the House of Representatives. He emphasized that the National Assembly, particularly the House of Representatives, is not intentionally stalling the amendment of the Electoral Act. Kalu noted that it was incorrect to suggest that lawmakers were deliberately slowing down the process. According to the Deputy Speaker, the House of Representatives has already carried out extensive legislative work aimed at addressing identified gaps within the existing Electoral Act. He explained that the lower chamber has taken significant steps to ensure that necessary adjustments are made in preparation for future elections. Kalu further assured Nigerians that the House is currently awaiting the Senate to take corresponding action so that both chambers can complete the process through concurrent legislative approval, as required by law. Expressing optimism, he stated that he expects the Senate to conclude its part of the amendment process in due course, allowing the National Assembly to move forward collectively. The Deputy Speaker’s remarks were intended to reassure the Nigerian electorate that legislative efforts surrounding electoral reforms are ongoing and that there is no deliberate attempt to undermine democratic processes ahead of the 2027 polls
The Chairman of the House Minority Caucus Ad-hoc Committee, Afam Ogene, has attributed the alterations discovered in the officially gazetted version of Nigeria’s newly enacted tax law to what he described as executive rascality. Ogene made this position known on Friday while responding to questions during an interview on Arise Television, which was monitored by LMSINT MEDIA. According to the lawmaker, the inconsistencies identified in the new tax legislation can largely be traced to the overzealous conduct of certain officials within the executive arm of government. He suggested that such actions may have resulted in unauthorized modifications that deviated from what was lawfully approved by the National Assembly. He explained that within parliamentary procedure, committees are typically granted seven to fourteen days to submit a comprehensive report once they are constituted. In situations where the allotted timeframe proves insufficient, the committee is expected to present an interim report to the authority that established it, clearly stating the reasons additional time is required to complete a more detailed investigation. Ogene stated that the committee he chairs was instructed to conclude its work within seven days, which prompted an initial assessment rather than a full investigative conclusion. As a result, the committee’s immediate task was to confirm whether the reported discrepancies truly existed. “So far, what we have done is to establish that these issues are real,” he noted, adding that further efforts are necessary to determine who was responsible for the alterations, whether acting as individuals or on behalf of corporate interests. The legislator emphasized that the nature of the discrepancies strongly points to excessive enthusiasm on the part of some executive officials. He summarized this conduct as executive rascality, noting that there is often a mistaken belief within the executive branch that bills initiated by them should be returned unchanged after legislative consideration. While he avoided using the phrase “rubber stamp,” Ogene stressed that the National Assembly is not designed to merely approve executive submissions without scrutiny. He remarked that legislative work does not operate on a “garbage in, garbage out” basis, underscoring the importance of the 360 lawmakers who collectively serve to review, debate, and refine proposed legislation. He further outlined the established lawmaking process, which includes a first reading, second reading, public hearings, and deliberations by the Committee of the Whole. This is followed by harmonization between the House of Representatives and the Senate. Once this process is concluded, the Clerk of the National Assembly is responsible for preparing a clean and accurate copy of the bill. This final version is then transmitted to the President, with the expectation that it faithfully reflects what was duly passed by the National Assembly. Ogene maintained that any deviation from this process undermines legislative integrity and raises serious concerns about accountability within the executive arm.
Kano State Governor, Alhaji Abba Kabir Yusuf, has officially withdrawn his membership from the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP), attributing his decision to prolonged internal conflicts and unresolved legal battles that he said have eroded the party’s unity across the country. The development was made public on Friday through a statement released by the governor’s spokesperson, Sunusi Bature Dawakin Tofa, confirming that the resignation followed extensive consultations and reflection. According to the statement, Governor Yusuf formally communicated his decision through a resignation letter addressed to the Chairman of the NNPP in Diso–Chiranchi Ward, located in Gwale Local Government Area of Kano State. The resignation takes effect from January 25, 2026. In the letter, the governor expressed deep appreciation to the NNPP leadership and members while formally announcing his departure from the party. “I write with a deep sense of gratitude to formally notify the leadership of the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) of my decision to resign my membership of the party,” the letter stated. Governor Yusuf acknowledged the role the NNPP played in his political journey, particularly since 2022, noting that the party provided the platform that enabled his emergence and service as governor. “I remain sincerely appreciative of the opportunity given to me by the party, its leadership, and members across Kano State to be part of its political journey since 2022,” he noted. However, the governor explained that his decision was influenced by persistent leadership crises, factional disputes, and multiple court cases that have continued to destabilize the party at both the state and national levels. He pointed out that many of the disagreements remain unresolved and are currently subject to judicial proceedings, further weakening internal cohesion. “In recent times, the party has been confronted with persistent internal challenges arising from leadership disagreements and ongoing legal processes, many of which are presently before the courts for judicial determination,” Yusuf stated. According to him, these unresolved issues have resulted in widespread dissatisfaction among party members and significantly weakened the party’s organizational structure. “The growing disenfranchisement among party members has created deep divisions within the party structure, resulting in cracks that appear increasingly irreconcilable,” the letter added. Governor Yusuf emphasized that his resignation was reached after careful consideration and was guided solely by the collective interest of Kano State residents, rather than personal or political grievances. “After careful reflection, and without prejudice to the party’s capacity to resolve its internal challenges, I have come to the conclusion that my resignation is in the best interest of the people of Kano State,” he said, stressing that the decision was taken “in good faith, without any ill will.” The governor’s exit from the NNPP was not an isolated development. It was accompanied by the resignation of 21 members of the Kano State House of Assembly, eight members of the House of Representatives, as well as all 44 local government chairmen across the state, further underscoring the scale of the political shift. The resignation letter was formally acknowledged by the Secretary of the NNPP Diso–Chiranchi Ward, Hon. Kabiru Zubairu, who commended Governor Yusuf’s performance while accepting the decision. “I wish to concur with His Excellency on the lingering crisis in our party. Though we are trying our best to contain it, we have no option than to accept the resignation of one of the most performing governors produced by the NNPP,” Zubairu said. He praised Governor Yusuf’s achievements in key sectors such as infrastructure development, urban renewal, healthcare delivery, education, and economic empowerment, as Kano’s political environment continues to experience notable realignments ahead of future political contests.
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is presently holding a private, closed-door meeting with the Olubadan of Ibadanland, Oba Rashidi Adewolu Ladoja, at the Presidential Villa in Abuja. The engagement comes shortly after the revered traditional ruler concluded a high-level discussion with the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Senator George Akume, also in Abuja, on Thursday. According to available information, the earlier meeting between the Olubadan and the SGF centered on critical ecological challenges currently affecting various parts of Ibadan city. These environmental concerns have remained a major issue within the ancient city, prompting engagements with top federal officials. Following that discussion, the monarch proceeded to the Presidential Villa for the ongoing audience with President Tinubu. The meeting is being held behind closed doors, with no official briefing released at the time this report was filed. As of now, specific details regarding the agenda, deliberations, or outcomes of the Olubadan’s meeting with the President have not been made public. Authorities are yet to disclose whether the discussion builds directly on the ecological matters earlier raised or addresses other related concerns. Further updates are expected once official information becomes available.
The legal contest surrounding the suspension of the senator representing Kogi Central, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, has taken a new turn as Senate President Godswill Akpabio has again approached the Supreme Court for judicial intervention. Documents obtained on Thursday reveal that Akpabio has submitted an application before the apex court seeking to regularise and uphold his appeal against earlier judgments delivered by lower courts in relation to the suspension dispute. In the filing, Akpabio is named as the appellant, while the respondents include Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, the Clerk of the National Assembly, the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions, Senator Neda Imasuen. The controversy traces back to a Senate plenary session in February 2025, during which Akpoti-Uduaghan raised matters of privilege and alleged that certain procedural rules were violated during proceedings. Following the session, the issues she raised were referred to the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions. After deliberations, the committee recommended her suspension from legislative duties, a decision that sparked widespread legal and constitutional debate. Unhappy with the outcome, the Kogi Central lawmaker approached the Federal High Court in Abuja, arguing that her suspension violated her right to fair hearing and failed to comply with provisions of the Senate Standing Orders. In its ruling delivered on July 4, 2025, the Federal High Court ruled against the suspension, declaring it excessive, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with established legal principles governing legislative discipline. After subsequent proceedings at the Court of Appeal, Akpabio escalated the matter to the Supreme Court, where he is requesting an extension of time to seek leave to appeal on grounds involving mixed law and fact. He is also asking the court to formally recognise his Notice of Appeal and Brief of Argument as validly filed. In his arguments before the apex court, the Senate President maintained that the Senate acted within its constitutional authority as provided under Section 60 of the 1999 Constitution, which empowers the National Assembly to regulate its internal procedures. He further argued that the Senate President is not legally compelled to rule immediately on every issue of privilege raised during plenary sessions, insisting that the Senate lawfully activated its disciplinary mechanisms in this instance. On her part, Akpoti-Uduaghan has consistently held that her suspension was illegal, asserting that it was imposed without granting her a fair hearing and that the Senate failed to adhere to its own procedural rules. It was confirmed on Thursday that legal representatives of the Kogi senator have been duly served with all Supreme Court documents related to the appeal. The case also encompasses a related contempt proceeding, which arose from a social media post made by Akpoti-Uduaghan while the substantive suit was still before the court. In that matter, the Federal High Court imposed a fine and ordered a public apology, a ruling she has also challenged on appeal. Legal analysts observing the case believe the Supreme Court’s eventual judgment may offer important clarification on the limits of legislative disciplinary powers and the extent to which courts can intervene in internal parliamentary matters. This development comes barely two weeks after Akpabio publicly announced his decision to withdraw several pending court actions against perceived adversaries, adding another layer of complexity to the unfolding legal drama. Despite the ongoing litigation, Akpoti-Uduaghan officially resumed legislative duties on September 23, 2025, after completing a six-month suspension and regaining access to her office at the National Assembly. Her office had remained sealed from March 6, 2025, following the suspension imposed over alleged misconduct linked to a protest against the reassignment of her seating position by Akpabio on February 20. Although the suspension period expired in September, her return was delayed due to persistent legal disputes and resistance from Senate leadership. After the July 4 court ruling, she formally notified the Senate of her intention to resume duties, but the request was initially declined.
The North-Central All Progressives Congress (APC) Forum has openly opposed any plan aimed at removing Vice President Kashim Shettima as President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s running mate ahead of the 2027 general election. The group described such a move as a serious political error that could weaken the party’s chances. This position was made public in a statement released on Thursday in Abuja by the forum’s chairman, Alhaji Saleh Zazzaga, following growing reports that certain individuals within the ruling party were lobbying for Shettima’s replacement on the 2027 ticket. Concerns intensified after Vice President Shettima’s photograph was noticeably missing from a large banner displayed during the APC North-East zonal public hearing on proposed amendments to the party’s constitution, held in Maiduguri. The banner carried images of President Tinubu, five APC governors from the region, and the party’s National Legal Adviser, but excluded the vice president. That omission sparked renewed conversations about Shettima’s political future and the sustainability of the APC’s Muslim-Muslim presidential ticket ahead of the next election cycle. Following the incident, reports emerged that some party stakeholders were advocating for the selection of a Christian running mate, particularly from the North-Central zone. Some pressure groups from the region reportedly argued that choosing a Christian vice-presidential candidate would balance religious representation and appeal to minority voters. However, the North-Central APC Forum firmly rejected this reasoning. According to the forum, removing Shettima would be damaging to the party and could seriously endanger President Tinubu’s re-election prospects in 2027. The group stressed that the North-Central region is not lobbying for the vice-presidential slot, explaining that its long-term political focus is on contesting the presidency in 2031, after Tinubu’s tenure. The forum also warned against allowing religious sentiment to dominate strategic political decisions. It argued that, at present, the North lacks a Christian candidate with the necessary grassroots strength, nationwide influence, and political structure capable of complementing Tinubu’s electoral base as effectively as Shettima. In its view, abandoning a ticket that previously delivered victory would only create openings for opposition parties to exploit in the 2027 race. “There is a clear risk in tampering with a winning formula,” the forum stated. “We completely reject all calls or plans to remove Vice President Kashim Shettima as President Bola Tinubu’s running mate in the next election.” The statement further urged President Tinubu and APC leadership to disregard such demands, warning that yielding to them would amount to a costly political misjudgment. The forum accused those pushing for Shettima’s removal of acting against the interests of both the party and the president, suggesting their actions were designed to undermine Tinubu’s chances of securing a second term. “Anyone making such a request does not genuinely want President Bola Tinubu re-elected,” the forum asserted, adding that political experience clearly shows the danger of such a move. Analyzing voting patterns across the North, the group argued that Tinubu would not gain additional electoral support by changing his running mate. Instead, it warned that removing Shettima on religious grounds could trigger voter backlash and result in significant losses for the APC in the region. The forum also pointed out that if an opposition coalition supported by the African Democratic Congress (ADC) fields Peter Obi as its presidential candidate in 2027, changing the vice-presidential slot would not alter voting behavior among many northern minorities. According to the forum, such voters would likely support Obi regardless of Tinubu’s choice of running mate. Based on this assessment, the forum advised President Tinubu to retain Shettima and maintain the current ticket in order to strengthen his chances in the next general election. It further argued that many of those calling for a replacement did not support Tinubu during the 2023 election and would remain unwilling to vote for him in 2027, even if their demands were met. “If you review the 2023 election results carefully,” the forum noted, “you will see that most of these communities voted for Peter Obi of the Labour Party.” The group concluded that even if Obi contests again in 2027 under the ADC platform, there is no assurance that these voters would switch allegiance to Tinubu, regardless of who becomes his running mate.
Governor Caleb Mutfwang of Plateau State has expressed profound grief and outrage following a deadly assault on a mining settlement in the Kuru community of Jos South Local Government Area, where seven individuals were brutally killed by suspected terrorists. The violent incident reportedly took place late Wednesday night, leaving multiple others with injuries. This was disclosed in an official statement released on Thursday by the Governor’s Director of Press and Public Affairs, Gyang Bere. Governor Mutfwang described the attack as cruel, unjustified, and deeply distressing, particularly coming at a period when his administration has intensified initiatives aimed at restoring peace and stability across Plateau State. According to the statement, the governor strongly denounced what he described as coordinated attacks carried out in Kuru, Gyel, and Buhum communities located within Chugwi Village of the Vwang District. He reiterated that his government remains unwavering in its responsibility to protect lives and property in all parts of the state. The governor mourned the loss of innocent citizens and emphasized that such acts of violence would not weaken the government’s determination to confront terrorism, banditry, and other criminal activities threatening public safety. Governor Mutfwang praised the commitment and perseverance of security agencies operating within Plateau State and urged them to further strengthen intelligence-driven operations to ensure those responsible are swiftly identified, apprehended, and brought to justice. He also instructed security operatives to deepen collaboration with local communities to enable early detection and neutralisation of potential threats, while assuring families affected by the attack of the government’s full support and solidarity. In addition, the governor called on officers of Operation Rainbow to reinforce intelligence collection and early-warning systems to allow for faster and more effective security interventions. Governor Mutfwang reassured residents of Plateau State of his continued dedication to their safety, welfare, and overall well-being. Confirming the incident, the Senior Special Assistant to the governor on Artisanal Mining, Emmanuel Solomon, told The PUNCH that seven miners lost their lives during the attack in Kuru. Solomon described the event as deeply unfortunate, noting that it forms part of a troubling pattern of repeated attacks targeting miners within the Jos South council area. He recalled that only days earlier, armed assailants attacked three individuals in another Gyel community. While one person managed to escape, two others were killed during the ambush as they made their way to a mining site. Solomon further revealed that about two weeks before the Kuru incident, another group of miners was attacked, resulting in two deaths and one injury. The injured individual is currently receiving medical care at Lome Hospital. Speaking with visible grief, Solomon disclosed that one of the deceased victims was his younger brother, lamenting that innocent people continue to lose their lives to senseless violence across the state. He stressed that the worsening situation demands immediate action and assured that the Plateau State Government would investigate the matter thoroughly to ensure miners receive adequate security protection moving forward. Attempts to obtain official reactions from security agencies were unsuccessful. The Jos South Area Commander of the Nigerian Forest Security Service, Pam Gyang Pwajok, said he was not immediately aware of the incident but promised to make inquiries. Similarly, the spokesperson for the Plateau State Police Command, Alabo Alfred, could not be reached as his mobile phone was switched off. This latest attack underscores a growing trend of violent assaults on mining communities in Plateau State, intensifying concerns over the safety of artisanal miners and highlighting the urgent need for stronger security measures across Jos South and surrounding areas.
The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, has initiated a legal case against the Joint Unions Action Committee of the Federal Capital Territory Administration following the ongoing indefinite strike embarked upon by FCTA workers. The matter is scheduled to be heard on Monday at the National Industrial Court in Abuja. Employees of both the Federal Capital Territory Administration and the Federal Capital Development Authority began the indefinite industrial action on Monday after a seven-day ultimatum issued to management elapsed without resolution. The strike has significantly disrupted official activities across major government offices within Abuja. As a result of the industrial action, operations at the FCTA Secretariat were completely halted. Security operatives from the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps, alongside officers of the Nigeria Police Force, were deployed to the secretariat to prevent access to the premises and maintain order. Although the management of the FCTA maintained that the majority of the workers’ grievances had already been addressed, the Joint Unions Action Committee dismissed the claim. The union leadership insisted that the critical demands presented to the authorities remained unresolved, thereby justifying the continuation of the strike. Court documents obtained on Thursday revealed that the lawsuit was filed at the Abuja Division of the National Industrial Court of Nigeria. The case, marked with suit number NICN/ABJ/17/2026, is being handled by Justice E. D. Subilim. In the suit, the claimants are the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory and the FCTA, while the defendants are the President of the Joint Unions Action Committee, Rifkatu Iortyer, and the Secretary-General, Abdullahi Saleh, both sued in their representative capacities. The court filings indicate that the minister and the FCTA are seeking an order to restrain the unions and their representatives from carrying out activities such as picketing, obstruction, lockouts, or any other actions targeted at the claimants, departmental leadership, and political appointees. The unions were accused of obstructing roads, sealing offices, and interfering with the effective administration of the Federal Capital Territory. At the hearing of the application, legal representatives for the claimants were present in court, while the defendants were not in attendance. The minister and the FCTA were represented by a team of senior legal practitioners, including Ogwu Onoja (SAN), M. A. Ebute (SAN), George Ibrahim (SAN), K. O. Mustapha, and Esther Audu. After examining the affidavits and written arguments presented before the court, Justice Subilim ruled that the applicants had shown sufficient justification for the reliefs sought. The court consequently granted permission for substituted service of court documents on the defendants. In a ruling delivered on January 21, the court authorised that the court processes be served through publication in Leadership Newspaper or any other national daily newspaper. The judge also ordered that the documents be pasted at the office of the Joint Unions Action Committee located within the FCTA Secretariat at No. 1 Kapital Street, Area 11, Garki, Abuja. The court further declared that the adopted method of service would be regarded as valid and legally binding. Justice Subilim stated that after listening to submissions from the applicants’ counsel and reviewing the reliefs requested alongside the supporting affidavits and written addresses, the court was satisfied that a case had been established. He therefore granted leave for the originating and subsequent court processes to be served through substituted means and adjourned the matter to January 26, 2026, for a motion on notice. Despite the legal proceedings, the Joint Unions Action Committee has affirmed that the strike will continue. In a statement released on Thursday and signed by the union’s Publicity Secretary, Holina Adejoh, the leadership praised workers for adhering to the directive to remain away from their duty posts. The statement expressed appreciation to members for their compliance and reaffirmed that the industrial action would persist until all demands were addressed. The union also acknowledged awareness of the court case, informing workers that the Minister of the FCTA had instituted legal proceedings against the union leadership.
The United States has formally completed its exit from the World Health Organisation (WHO), according to an announcement released by the White House on Thursday. The decision was linked to concerns over how the global health body handled the COVID-19 pandemic, alongside what US officials described as a long-standing failure to implement critical institutional reforms. In an official statement, the White House explained that both the US Department of Health and Human Services and the US Department of State supported the move. The withdrawal was attributed to what the administration described as WHO’s poor management of the COVID-19 crisis, which originated in Wuhan, China, as well as the organisation’s inability to demonstrate political independence from certain member states. The statement specifically accused WHO of mishandling the early stages of the pandemic, failing to introduce urgent reforms, and allowing inappropriate political influence to shape its actions and decisions. According to US officials, these factors collectively undermined trust in the organisation’s leadership and operational neutrality. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., alongside Secretary of State Marco Rubio, confirmed that while the withdrawal has been finalised, the United States will maintain limited coordination with WHO strictly for the purpose of completing the disengagement process. The withdrawal process officially began on January 20, 2025, when President Donald Trump publicly declared the administration’s intention to pull the United States out of the organisation. Following that announcement, the US gradually reduced its involvement over the course of the year. During this period, the United States halted its financial contributions to WHO, withdrew American personnel working within the organisation, and reassigned activities previously conducted through WHO to direct partnerships with other countries and international bodies. These actions marked a steady reduction in US participation before the final withdrawal was completed. The White House further criticised WHO for what it described as delays in declaring both a global public health emergency and a pandemic during the early spread of COVID-19. According to the statement, these delays cost the international community valuable time, allowing the virus to spread more widely before coordinated global responses were implemented. US officials also accused WHO leadership of publicly supporting and praising China’s handling of the outbreak, despite evidence suggesting early underreporting, suppression of information, and delays in confirming human-to-human transmission of the virus. Additionally, the statement claimed that WHO underestimated the risks associated with asymptomatic transmission and failed to promptly recognise and communicate the airborne nature of the virus. These shortcomings, the White House argued, weakened global containment efforts at a critical stage of the pandemic. Beyond pandemic response issues, WHO was also criticised for failing to introduce reforms following COVID-19. The White House highlighted concerns over the organisation’s report on the possible origins of the virus, which dismissed the theory that COVID-19 may have been created in a laboratory. According to the US statement, this conclusion was reached despite China’s refusal to release genetic sequences from individuals infected early in the outbreak and a lack of transparency regarding the activities and biosafety standards of laboratories in Wuhan. LMSINT MEDIA also reported that WHO disclosed the United States had not paid its membership dues for both 2024 and 2025. These unpaid contributions reportedly total approximately $260 million. WHO indicated that while the issue would be discussed during its executive board meeting scheduled for February, the organisation had no mechanism to block the US withdrawal. Reacting to the development, WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus expressed disappointment over the decision. He stated that the withdrawal represented a loss not only for the United States but also for the broader international community. According to him, the issue extended beyond funding and centred on cooperation, unity, and global solidarity in addressing public health challenges. Despite the exit, the White House reaffirmed that the United States intends to continue playing a leadership role in global health. The administration said it will pursue this through direct collaboration with other nations, private sector partners, non-governmental organisations, and faith-based institutions. The US emphasised that its future global health efforts will focus on emergency preparedness and response, biosecurity coordination, and advancing health innovation both domestically and internationally.
Confusion and concern have followed the discovery of heaps of human faeces at the office complex of the Chairman of Bende Local Government Area (LGA) in Abia State. The incident was disclosed by the Special Adviser on Media and Publicity to the Chairman of Bende LGA, Chimezie Princewill Okezie, who confirmed that the offensive substance was found within the local government council premises. According to Okezie, the faeces were deliberately deposited around the political block that houses the office of the Executive Chairman of the council, Uwabunkeonye Bassey. He explained that the substance was plastered at various entrances leading into the complex, creating what he described as a disturbing and shocking scene. While the identity of those responsible for the act has not yet been established, Okezie stated that the situation raised serious concerns about motive and intent. He noted that the manner in which the faeces were placed suggested a deliberate attempt to insult, provoke, and desecrate a public institution. Speaking further, Okezie alleged that the incident amounted to a targeted attack on the Chairman of Bende LGA. He claimed that political opponents, whom he said had been unable to rival the Chairman’s achievements in governance, were likely behind the action. He recounted that earlier in the day, specifically on Wednesday, staff and visitors arriving at the Bende Local Government Council Headquarters were met with the disturbing sight within the political block that houses the Chairman’s office. According to him, the act went beyond verbal criticism or online propaganda, reflecting what he described as desperation and pettiness from disgruntled opposition elements. Okezie maintained that the act was not only offensive but also an assault on the dignity of the council, its workforce, and the people of Bende LGA as a whole. He emphasized that public institutions should be respected, regardless of political differences. He further assured members of the public that the matter would not be ignored. According to him, anyone found to be responsible for the act, irrespective of political or personal affiliation, would face appropriate consequences. Okezie concluded by stating that such actions cannot be overlooked or swept aside, stressing that accountability would be enforced to uphold the integrity of the local government and maintain public order.
New Zealanders are preparing to head to the polls later this year as the nation faces economic stagnation and a notable rise in unemployment rates. The announcement comes at a time when the country is evaluating its progress under the centre-right government led by Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. On January 21, 2026, Prime Minister Luxon formally declared that the country’s next national election will take place on November 7, 2026, during an address in Christchurch. During the announcement, he highlighted his administration’s achievements in key areas such as economic stability and crime reduction. Luxon emphasized the government’s economic progress, noting that inflation had decreased from 7 percent to 3 percent, a move he described as evidence of effective fiscal management. Additionally, he pointed out that there were 38,000 fewer self-reported crime victims under his administration, a statistic he cited as a reflection of improved law-and-order policies. “When we assumed office, the nation was heading in the wrong direction. It has required significant effort over the past two years to begin reversing that trend,” Luxon stated in his official release.“Our focus remains on executing our strategy to address fundamental challenges and prepare New Zealand for a prosperous future, ensuring citizens see tangible results ahead of the election later this year,” he added. Luxon’s National Party, which champions center-right policies, maintains its position through a coalition with the populist New Zealand First party and the pro-business ACT Party. This coalition emerged after the National Party’s decisive victory over the centre-left Labour Party in the 2023 general election. A former Air New Zealand CEO, Luxon campaigned on issues including law enforcement, crime reduction, and alleviating the rising cost of living—concerns that intensified in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. His leadership style has been marked by a pragmatic approach to economic and social policy, which he continues to promote leading up to the election. Despite these accomplishments, his government’s record is under increased scrutiny. New Zealand’s economy has experienced contractions in three out of the last six quarters ending September 2025. Furthermore, unemployment rose to 5.3 percent in November, the highest level recorded in nearly twenty years. These figures have sparked debates among political analysts and the electorate regarding the overall effectiveness of Luxon’s governance. Recent opinion polls indicate that the National Party may be losing some ground to the Labour Party, now led by Chris Hipkins. However, projections suggest that Luxon’s coalition could still retain governing power, assuming continued cooperation among its partner parties. The upcoming election is shaping up to be a closely watched contest that could determine the direction of New Zealand’s economy and social policies in the coming years. As New Zealanders prepare to cast their votes on November 7, the political landscape remains dynamic, with voters evaluating party performance on issues such as economic recovery, public safety, and post-pandemic reforms. This election could prove pivotal in shaping the nation’s future trajectory, both economically and socially.
US President Donald Trump has intensified his statements regarding the potential acquisition of Greenland, emphasizing on social media that there is “no going back” and asserting that the island nation is “imperative” to the United States’ strategic interests. During a press briefing at the White House, Trump was asked about the extent of his commitment to securing Greenland. In response, he stated ambiguously, “You’ll find out.” His comments have renewed global attention on Greenland’s geopolitical significance, particularly in relation to the Arctic and international security concerns. At the same time, other world leaders highlighted the fragile state of global diplomacy. French President Emmanuel Macron, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, cautioned against a “shift towards a world without rules”. Similarly, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney warned that the “old global order is not coming back”, reflecting growing concerns over international stability. Trump was scheduled to attend the Davos forum on Wednesday. However, a minor electrical malfunction on Air Force One forced the aircraft to return to the United States, creating uncertainty over his travel itinerary. The White House confirmed that Trump would continue his journey to Davos on a different aircraft. Despite the delay, Trump maintained that his focus on Greenland remains strong. He highlighted that “a lot of meetings [are] scheduled on Greenland”, signaling a continued push for discussions and negotiations concerning the strategic territory. During the extended press session, Trump reassured reporters that “things are going to work out pretty well” regarding Greenland. When questioned by the BBC about whether potential tensions within the NATO alliance might be a price he is willing to pay for Greenland, Trump emphasized, “Nobody has done more for NATO than I have, in every way.” He added, “NATO is going to be happy and we are going to be happy,” underlining his view that Greenland is vital for global security. Earlier in the briefing, Trump expressed uncertainty over NATO’s commitment to the United States if a crisis arose. “I know we’ll come to [NATO’s] rescue, but I just really do question whether or not they’ll come to ours,” he remarked. NATO, or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, is currently composed of 32 member states, including the United States, which was among the 12 founding countries. Established to protect freedom and security through collective defense, Article 5 of the NATO treaty stipulates that an armed attack against one or more member states is considered an attack against all, a principle central to the alliance’s mission. Trump has not dismissed the possibility of military action to gain control over Greenland. When questioned by NBC News about the potential use of force, he responded with a cautious “no comment”, leaving the international community uncertain about the future of this strategic Arctic territory. The developments surrounding Greenland underscore its growing geopolitical importance, particularly as Arctic resources and strategic locations gain global attention. Analysts suggest that Greenland could play a crucial role in US defense strategy, Arctic sovereignty, and the broader contest for influence in polar regions.
The Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II, has publicly urged Governor Abba Yusuf of Kano State to sign death warrants for convicted murderers, stressing that the enforcement of capital punishment could serve as a crucial deterrent against future violent crimes. The monarch’s appeal came in the wake of the shocking murder of Fatima Abubakar, a housewife, and her six children in a tragic incident that occurred on Saturday in the state. Sanusi described the killings as an appalling act of brutality that reflects broader societal failure to uphold justice. He also called for the swift prosecution of those apprehended in connection with the massacre. According to Sanusi, once the court reaches a conviction, the Governor should promptly authorize the execution of the sentence, reinforcing the principle that crime must meet its consequences. Sanusi Condemns the Brutality and Calls for Justice Emir Sanusi condemned the killings as senseless and barbaric, stating that society’s leniency towards murderers undermines law and order. He said: “We expressed condolences to the deceased husband, the family, and the state at large. If society continues to tolerate murder without delivering justice, such crimes will inevitably persist. “It is unacceptable for a person who commits murder, pleads guilty in court, and is sentenced to death, to escape execution simply because the governor has not signed the warrant. Leaders must understand that pardoning a murderer out of pity is unjust, since the perpetrator showed no mercy to the victims.” The Emir emphasized that in cases of murder, only the family of the victim and God hold the authority to forgive, and granting mercy through governmental intervention undermines justice. He insisted that reinstating the enforcement of capital punishment is essential to deter violent crimes. “If individuals know that taking another person’s life could cost them their own, it will serve as a strong deterrent against committing murder,” Sanusi added. He further commended the police for their prompt arrest of the suspects and urged the judiciary to expedite trials, emphasizing that the swift signing of death warrants would reinforce public confidence in the justice system. Kano State Government Responds to Heinous Crime In a related statement, the Kano State Government reiterated its commitment to curbing violent crimes across the state. The State Commissioner for Internal Security, AVM Ibrahim Umaru (Retd), expressed profound shock over the murder of Fatima Abubakar and her children during a condolence visit to the family’s residence at Chiranci Quarters in Kumbotso Local Government Area. The Commissioner assured that the government would not remain passive, stating that the security agencies, including the police and the newly established Neighborhood Watch, will be fully equipped to combat such crimes and protect the lives and properties of citizens. AVM Umaru highlighted drug abuse and unemployment among youths as major factors contributing to criminal behavior, and noted that the government, in partnership with the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA), will intensify efforts to address these challenges. He also emphasized the importance of parental and community involvement to complement government actions in curbing violence. Support for Victims’ Families In a gesture of immediate relief, AVM Umaru presented bags of rice, cartons of spaghetti and pasta, and a cash donation of one million naira to the family of the victims, providing temporary assistance while the legal process continues. The Kano State Government and Emir Sanusi’s calls reflect a coordinated effort to restore justice, enforce the rule of law, and deter violent crimes in the state.

