Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta has clarified the reason behind his choice to start goalkeeper Kepa Arrizabalaga ahead of David Raya during the Carabao Cup final clash with Manchester City. The encounter, which took place at Wembley Stadium, ended with Manchester City securing a 2-0 victory over Arsenal to lift the Carabao Cup trophy on Sunday night. Arsenal entered the decisive fixture with strong ambition, as the club remained competitive across multiple competitions and was still pursuing success on four different fronts. During the opening half, both sides maintained a cautious approach, carefully studying each other’s tactics without creating clear chances. The first forty-five minutes ended without any goal, as defensive discipline and midfield control prevented either team from finding the breakthrough. Shortly after the interval, the match shifted in favour of Manchester City. A costly mistake occurred when Arrizabalaga failed to properly secure the ball, allowing Nico O’Reilly to react quickly and head the ball into an unguarded net, giving City the advantage. Only a few minutes later, O’Reilly struck again with another header, doubling the lead and putting the result beyond doubt. The quick succession of goals ensured that Manchester City comfortably finished the match as winners. After the final whistle, Arteta faced questions regarding his selection decision, particularly why Arrizabalaga was chosen instead of Raya for such an important match. The Arsenal coach stood firmly by his decision and made it clear that he had no intention of reconsidering the call. According to Arteta, the selection was based on fairness, professionalism, and what he believed to be the correct decision for the squad. He stated that making a different choice would have been unjust to the player as well as to the rest of the team, emphasizing that every decision must remain honest and consistent with the values of the group. Despite the disappointment in the Carabao Cup final, Arsenal’s overall season position remains strong. The North London side currently holds a significant nine-point lead over Manchester City in the Premier League standings and continues to compete in both the UEFA Champions League and the FA Cup, keeping their hopes alive for major achievements before the season concludes. For more football competition details, visit the official website ofUEFA – https://www.uefa.com
Former Liverpool defender and football analyst Jamie Carragher has pointed out what he believes was a costly mistake made by Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta during the Carabao Cup final clash against Manchester City. Arsenal suffered a frustrating 2-0 defeat against their strong rivals, missing the chance to win their first trophy of the 2025-26 campaign. The loss extended the club’s wait for silverware, leaving supporters disappointed after high expectations going into the final. Carragher shared his opinion on X, stating that Arteta made the wrong call by choosing Kepa Arrizabalaga ahead of the regular first-choice goalkeeper David Raya for such an important match. According to Carragher, the long period Arsenal has gone without lifting a trophy should have played a key role in the manager’s selection decisions, especially in a final where experience and form are critical. He wrote on X that selecting Kepa instead of Raya was a major error, adding that when a club has waited so long for success, the manager must always put the strongest possible lineup on the pitch in order to give fans the best chance of celebrating a trophy. Arteta, however, defended his decision after the match. The Arsenal boss explained that he felt it was fair to keep Kepa in goal because the Spanish goalkeeper had featured in every Carabao Cup game for the team during the season. Arteta insisted that rewarding players who helped the club reach the final is part of maintaining trust within the squad. The 31-year-old Kepa joined Arsenal during the summer transfer window to provide backup for Raya and has mainly been used in domestic cup competitions rather than league matches. During the final, Kepa’s performance became a major talking point. Around the hour mark, he failed to deal properly with a high cross delivered by Rayan Cherki, which allowed Nico O’Reilly to score and give Manchester City a crucial advantage. Statistics from the match showed that the former Chelsea goalkeeper did not register a single save, while Manchester City managed to score with both of their shots on target, making Arsenal’s defeat even more painful. In contrast, David Raya has been one of Arsenal’s most consistent performers this season. The Spanish international currently leads the Premier League clean-sheet standings with 15 shutouts, highlighting the strong form that made many fans question why he was left on the bench for such an important final. The result has sparked debate among supporters and analysts, with many agreeing that team selection in major finals can determine the outcome, especially when the margin for error is extremely small.
Kindly Share:
Former Liverpool midfielder Jamie Redknapp has strongly criticized Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta after the coach made a controversial decision to start goalkeeper Kepa Arrizabalaga instead of David Raya, a choice that ultimately went wrong during Arsenal’s 2-0 loss to Manchester City in the Carabao Cup Final played on Sunday. The selection raised eyebrows before kickoff, and the situation became worse after a costly mistake from Kepa contributed to Arsenal’s defeat. The error allowed City to take control of the match comfortably, as the team managed by Pep Guardiola dominated the encounter at Wembley Stadium. Young forward Nico O’Reilly scored twice in the game, securing the victory and ensuring that Manchester City lifted the trophy without much resistance from the Gunners. While speaking during match analysis on Sky Sports, Redknapp openly questioned Arteta’s decision-making, describing the goalkeeper selection as a serious miscalculation in such an important match. According to Redknapp, Raya has been Arsenal’s first-choice goalkeeper for a reason, and choosing the backup in a major final was a risky move that did not pay off. He stressed that when a club has waited for a long period to win silverware, the manager must rely on his strongest lineup instead of experimenting. Redknapp explained that the decision placed unnecessary pressure on the team and eventually affected the outcome of the game. He added that mistakes in finals often prove costly, and in this case, the gamble taken by Arteta ended up working against Arsenal at the worst possible moment. He concluded by saying that the choice will likely be remembered as one of the key reasons Arsenal failed to secure the trophy, as the team could not recover after conceding and never fully regained control of the match.
Kindly Share:
Controversial Nigerian street-hop artist, Habeeb Okikiola Badmus, widely recognized by his stage name Portable, has issued a strong warning to Yoruba citizens, stating that anyone who refuses to vote for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in the forthcoming 2027 general election may face spiritual repercussions. In a video currently circulating online, the Zazu crooner openly declared that Yoruba individuals who oppose the reelection of the current president could attract curses and traditional punishment. His statement has generated reactions across social media platforms, with many Nigerians debating the role of entertainers in political campaigns. While speaking in the broadcast, Portable insisted that maintaining peace in Nigeria depends on supporting the present administration. According to him, voting against President Tinubu could bring instability to the country, which he claimed must be avoided at all cost. He further revealed that he has been officially engaged to promote the president’s political ambition. The singer alleged that he has already been provided with campaign materials by the ruling party, the All Progressives Congress (APC), and will soon begin active campaigning across Yoruba communities. Portable stated in the video that the campaign activities would include public mobilization and distribution of food items to citizens as part of political outreach programs. He also mentioned that he would soon start moving from place to place to encourage people to support the president’s second-term ambition. According to his words: “We want peace in Nigeria, and we must protect that peace. Anyone who does not want conflict in this country should vote for Tinubu in the next election.Thunder and Ogun will deal with any Yoruba person who refuses. I have already been signed, they gave me APC clothes, and very soon I will begin sharing rice and vegetable oil.” The video has continued to spread online, drawing mixed reactions from supporters, critics, and political observers who believe that statements like this may increase tension ahead of the 2027 elections. Some commentators have also expressed concern about the use of traditional beliefs and threats in political discussions. Watch the video below. Video
Kindly Share:
The ongoing confrontation surrounding the Strait of Hormuz has intensified after Iran effectively restricted movement through the strategic waterway, leading to sharp warnings from the United States and several Gulf nations. Both sides are now issuing threats targeting oil and energy infrastructure across the Middle East, raising fears of wider regional conflict. The President of the United States, Donald Trump, warned that Iran could face severe destruction of its energy facilities if the passage is not reopened within a period of 48 hours. According to the statement, Washington is prepared to take decisive action should Tehran fail to comply with the demand to restore full navigation through the channel. Iran responded immediately, declaring that any attack on its power stations would result in direct retaliation against energy-related installations connected to the United States throughout the Middle East. Officials in Tehran said the response would be permanent and irreversible if such actions were taken. The deadline issued by Washington is set to expire today, increasing tension across global markets and military circles. The warning from the U.S. president came shortly after Iranian missile strikes hit towns in southern Israel, including Arad and Dimona. Reports confirmed that more than 160 people were injured, making it one of the most damaging incidents since the conflict began. Following the attack, Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, stated that the country would respond on every possible front. Iran had earlier restricted access to the Strait of Hormuz, a water route responsible for transporting nearly one-fifth of the world’s crude oil during normal conditions. Analysts say the move represents one of Iran’s strongest bargaining tools in the ongoing confrontation. The crisis has already pushed global oil prices higher, with Brent crude rising above 105 dollars per barrel. Experts warn that continued disruption in the region could have long-term consequences for the world economy, especially for countries dependent on imported fuel. The ultimatum from Washington also came at a time when earlier statements suggested the United States might reduce military operations after weeks of conflict. Instead, the latest developments show increased military deployment, with additional American forces being sent to the Middle East. Iran’s Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, said that restrictions in the Strait were only applied to ships belonging to countries involved in attacks against Iran. He added that vessels from neutral countries would receive assistance and safe passage. In a message posted online, President Trump stated that the United States would strike several Iranian power facilities, starting with the largest, if the Strait was not fully reopened within the specified time. Supporting the president’s position, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that escalation might be necessary in order to bring the war to an end. He explained that increasing pressure could sometimes be required before a reduction in hostilities becomes possible, adding that strong action is the only language Tehran understands. Iran Warns of Attacks on U.S.-Linked Energy Facilities Iranian military officials announced that energy and desalination plants connected to the United States and its regional partners could become targets if Iran’s infrastructure is damaged. According to reports from Iranian media, the country is prepared to respond quickly if its power plants are attacked. The Speaker of Iran’s parliament, Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf, stated that important oil and energy installations across the region would be considered legitimate targets if Iran suffers damage to its own facilities. He warned that such actions could keep oil prices high for a long time and create lasting economic consequences. The intelligence division of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard also issued a statement suggesting that potential responses may not be limited to the Middle East alone. Officials said they have prepared a list of technological and political targets that could be struck within a short period if threats continue. The same statement claimed that Iran has strengthened its control over the Strait of Hormuz and gained influence over global energy supply routes during the conflict. Iran’s military command further warned that the Strait could be completely closed if the United States attacks Iranian power stations. According to the announcement, the waterway would remain shut until any destroyed facilities inside Iran are rebuilt. Officials also threatened possible strikes on Israeli power stations, communication networks, and energy facilities, along with infrastructure located in countries that host U.S. bases or companies connected to American investors. The military described these actions as necessary steps to protect the country and defend national interests. Iran Imposes Heavy Fees on Ships Crossing Strait of Hormuz An Iranian member of parliament, Alaeddin Boroujerdi, said that some ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz are being required to pay a fee of about two million dollars. He explained that the new rule reflects the cost of war and shows Iran’s authority over the strategic route. According to his statement, the new policy demonstrates the power the Islamic Republic holds over the waterway, especially during times of conflict. Meanwhile, Iran launched missile attacks on Israeli towns after strikes were carried out against the Natanz nuclear facility. The attacks on Arad and Dimona caused injuries to more than 160 people and resulted in serious damage to residential buildings and surrounding areas. Emergency responders reported dozens of casualties, including several people in critical condition. Images from the scene showed large craters and destroyed structures caused by the impact of the missiles. Dimona is known for hosting a sensitive facility widely believed to be connected to Israel’s nuclear capability, although the country has never officially confirmed possessing nuclear weapons. Iran said the strike was carried out in response to damage caused to its Natanz nuclear site, where underground centrifuges are used for uranium enrichment. The facility had already been affected during previous fighting. The United Nations nuclear agency urged all sides to avoid further escalation, warning that attacks on nuclear sites increase the risk of serious accidents. Israel denied responsibility for the Natanz strike but confirmed that it had targeted a research location in Tehran that it claimed was linked to missile and weapons development. WHO Warns
Kindly Share:
Israel carried out another series of airstrikes on Tehran on Monday, while Iran warned it could respond by targeting critical facilities across the Middle East. The ongoing confrontation has pushed the global economy toward one of the most serious energy supply crises seen in decades. Loud explosions were reported across Tehran, according to Iranian state media, as regional tensions intensified. At the same time, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates confirmed that their defense systems were intercepting incoming drones and missiles aimed at strategic locations. According to International Energy Agency Director Fatih Birol, at least forty energy-related installations throughout the oil-producing region have suffered heavy or extremely heavy damage since the conflict escalated. The war, which began following joint Israeli-US strikes on Iranian targets, has now entered its fourth week, increasing pressure on global fuel supplies. Iran has responded to the attacks by launching missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles toward Israel and several Gulf locations over recent weeks. Some of the strikes reportedly hit energy facilities and diplomatic compounds linked to the United States. In addition, shipping activity in the Strait of Hormuz has been restricted, raising concern because the passage carries roughly one-fifth of the world’s crude oil shipments. Oil prices have remained above one hundred dollars per barrel amid fears of shortages. US President Donald Trump warned that Iranian power stations could be destroyed if Tehran failed to reopen the strait within forty-eight hours. The deadline, calculated from the time of his social media statement, would fall late Monday night GMT, early Tuesday morning in Iran. Iranian officials rejected the warning. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf stated that if such action occurred, key infrastructure throughout the region would be treated as legitimate military targets and could be permanently destroyed. Speaking about the scale of the situation, Birol explained that around eleven million barrels of oil per day are currently being lost due to the conflict. This figure exceeds the daily supply disruption recorded during the two major oil crises of the 1970s. He stressed that no nation would escape the consequences if the situation continued to worsen and called for coordinated global action while speaking to reporters in Canberra. Iran considers new restrictions in Hormuz Asian stock markets weakened while oil prices climbed again early Monday, with US crude briefly touching the one-hundred-dollar mark. Iran has recently allowed limited passage through the Strait of Hormuz for vessels from countries it considers friendly, while warning that ships from nations involved in the conflict could be blocked. Lawmakers in Tehran are also discussing the possibility of imposing fees on ships using the route, with Ghalibaf saying maritime movement will not return to its previous level while the war continues. Trump has given mixed signals about the duration of the military campaign, stating on Friday that he was thinking about reducing operations, before later threatening strikes on power facilities, a move that would significantly increase the level of escalation. Extended fighting in Lebanon Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has indicated that the campaign against Iran and its allies could last for a long period. Iran has long been accused by Israel of supporting Hamas, which carried out the October 7, 2023 attack that triggered the war in Gaza. Israel has also expanded ground operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon, warning that the fighting there may continue for weeks. Military spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin told citizens that further clashes with Iran and Hezbollah should be expected. Israeli forces said they had been ordered to destroy bridges used by Hezbollah fighters to cross the Litani River, located about thirty kilometres north of the Israeli border. Lebanon’s health ministry reports that more than one thousand people have been killed since Israeli strikes began, while over one million residents have been displaced. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun described the attacks on bridges as a dangerous escalation and a violation of national sovereignty, warning they could signal preparation for a ground invasion. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam also blamed Hezbollah for contributing to the conflict, noting that the group began firing rockets after the reported killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei at the beginning of the war. Missile strikes reach southern Israel Israel has long relied on advanced air-defense systems, and both Trump and Netanyahu have claimed that several Iranian military sites were destroyed earlier in the campaign. However, Iranian missiles managed to bypass defenses and struck two southern Israeli towns, including Dimona, which lies near the country’s desert nuclear research facility, injuring dozens of people on Saturday. Residents said they believed the area was secure until the strike occurred. Netanyahu later stated that senior members of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards would be personally pursued as he visited damaged areas in the town of Arad. Rescue teams reported that one missile landed only a few kilometres from a location widely believed to hold the Middle East’s only nuclear arsenal, although Israel has never officially confirmed possessing nuclear weapons, maintaining that the site is used for research purposes. Iran said the strike near Dimona was retaliation for an earlier attack on its nuclear complex in Natanz. When asked about the incident, Israeli military officials said they were not aware of a strike on the facility. In Iran, reports from the US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency indicate that at least 3,230 people have been killed during the conflict, including more than 1,400 civilians. Independent verification remains difficult because journalists have limited access to the affected areas.
Kindly Share:
Nigeria’s electricity supply challenges continue to worsen as Electricity Distribution Companies (DisCos) posted a combined financial loss of N2.349 trillion within two years, largely caused by billing leakages and weak revenue collection systems. The development has further aggravated the liquidity crisis affecting the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry (NESI), leading to declining power generation and prolonged outages across the country. The power sector, already weighed down by an estimated N6 trillion debt as of December 2025, is moving closer to a structural breakdown. Several thermal power plants are currently struggling to secure enough gas supply required to maintain steady electricity generation, a situation that threatens the stability of the national grid. Persistent financial inefficiencies at the distribution level continue to erode the limited progress recorded in generation and transmission, making it difficult for the industry to maintain consistent power delivery to homes, offices, and businesses. Commercial performance statistics released by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) show that DisCos recorded losses of N1.015 trillion in 2024, while the figure increased by 31.4 percent in 2025, reaching N1.334 trillion. This brings the total loss for the two-year period to N2.349 trillion. Further analysis of the 2025 data reveals that billing inefficiencies accounted for N649.87 billion, while poor revenue collection resulted in N684.28 billion loss. Quarter-by-quarter figures also show irregular changes in the loss pattern during the year. DisCos recorded N378.11 billion loss in the first quarter of 2025, followed by N344.7 billion in the second quarter. The figure dropped by about 18 percent to N282.8 billion in the third quarter, before rising again by 16 percent to N328.54 billion in the fourth quarter. Liquidity Crisis Worsens, Triggering Nationwide Blackouts The growing financial pressure in the electricity sector is now clearly visible in the form of declining power supply nationwide, with many consumers experiencing longer and more frequent outages. Average electricity generation on the national grid has dropped from about 4,600 megawatts in 2025 to below 3,500MW within the first two months of 2026, worsening the power shortage. Industry figures indicate that Generation Companies (GenCos) are owed more than N6 trillion, forcing several plants to operate below installed capacity or shut down some units intermittently. Gas suppliers have also reduced deliveries due to unpaid invoices, further affecting electricity production. As a result, rolling blackouts have returned in many parts of the country, with DisCos adopting load-shedding to manage the limited electricity available. In several states, daily supply has fallen below 12 hours, while some communities receive only four to six hours of power. Residents in parts of Abuja, including Karu and Lokogoma, now receive only a few hours of electricity daily, forcing households and businesses to rely heavily on generators and alternative energy sources. Other states under the Abuja Electricity Distribution Company (AEDC), such as Nasarawa, Niger, and Kogi, have also experienced extended outages. In Delta State, within the Benin Electricity Distribution Company (BEDC) network, electricity supply remains unstable, with many communities receiving less than three hours of power daily. Residents in Ughelli, Warri, Sapele, Oleh, and nearby towns report persistent blackouts despite high estimated bills, with some communities staying in darkness for days without official explanation from the distribution company. Public frustration continues to grow as many consumers describe the current situation as unbearable. Presidential Villa Moves Off National Grid In a move that highlights the seriousness of Nigeria’s electricity problems, the Presidential Villa in Abuja has begun steps to disconnect from the national grid after completing a solar mini-grid project. The project, valued at about N17 billion, involves installing a dedicated solar hybrid power system designed to provide uninterrupted electricity to the seat of government. Officials explained that the decision was taken to guarantee energy security and reduce dependence on the unstable national grid. However, the Acting Managing Director of AEDC, Engr. Chijoke Okwuokenye, disagreed with the decision, saying it was not because the company could not supply electricity. According to him, the Villa had long relied on generators to avoid the risk of power interruption, and the arrangement continued over the years. He stated that with additional investment in storage and network upgrades, uninterrupted electricity could have been achieved without leaving the grid. He added that modern technology makes it possible to provide reliable power at a cost lower than diesel generation, and that DisCos are capable of delivering premium hybrid solutions that guarantee constant supply. He also noted that the continued use of generators by government agencies suggests that other interests may be influencing such decisions. Consumers Accuse DisCos of Exploitation Chairman of the Electricity Consumers Association of Nigeria, Chijoke James, accused distribution companies of exploiting customers through estimated billing. He said estimated billing remains one of the most unfair practices in the Nigerian power sector, as consumers are often charged for electricity they never received. According to him, excessive bills are one of the main reasons many customers refuse to pay. He also alleged that some staff members take advantage of the situation by demanding unofficial payments from consumers under the threat of disconnection without remitting the money to the company. He added that the sight of officials carrying ladders now creates suspicion among residents, who often believe the visit is meant for extortion rather than service delivery. Experts Blame Metering Gaps as Government Responds Power sector consultant and legal practitioner Bode Fadipe linked many of the sector’s inefficiencies to the lack of proper metering and poor transparency. He explained that without accurate meters, electricity consumption cannot be correctly measured, which leads to estimated billing. According to him, any billing method based on assumptions will always create disputes between consumers and distribution companies. He stressed that electricity can be measured at every stage of the value chain, from generation to transmission and distribution, and that proper metering is the only reliable solution. He also expressed concern that the Federal Government has not shown enough political commitment to fully resolve the financial crisis in the sector. He noted that some operators believe the government will always step in
Kindly Share:
The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has received the prestigious Central Bank of the Year recognition from Central Banking Magazine, following a series of wide-ranging economic reforms that helped restore macroeconomic balance and renewed investor trust in Nigeria’s financial system. This international recognition highlights what the publication described as a return to orthodox monetary policy, led by the CBN Governor Olayemi Cardoso, whose administration has focused on rebuilding stability after years of economic distortions, inconsistent policies, and uncertainty in the financial market. Before the implementation of the current reforms, Nigeria’s economy was considered to be in a fragile condition. The country faced rising inflation, a severely depreciated naira, declining foreign exchange reserves, and weakened confidence among both local and foreign investors. The situation became more complicated due to the existence of multiple exchange-rate windows, a large foreign exchange backlog estimated at about $7 billion, and excessive dependence on monetary financing to support government spending. These issues contributed to instability in the financial system and reduced credibility in policy direction. After assuming office in October 2023, Cardoso and his team began a comprehensive reform programme aimed at tightening monetary policy, improving transparency, and restoring the credibility of the apex bank. One of the most important steps taken was the restructuring of the foreign exchange market, including the adoption of a willing-buyer, willing-seller framework and the introduction of an electronic FX matching platform designed to improve efficiency and fairness in currency trading. These changes helped remove market distortions and significantly reduced the gap between the official exchange rate and the parallel market rate, which previously exceeded 60 percent but later dropped to less than two percent, showing a major improvement in market stability. The publication also reported that the CBN successfully cleared outstanding foreign exchange obligations, which helped rebuild trust among investors, importers, and businesses while improving liquidity across the financial market. In its effort to control inflation, the apex bank adopted a tighter monetary stance by increasing interest rates aggressively before gradually easing them when inflation started to slow down. Inflation, which rose above 34 percent in 2024, declined to around 15 percent by early 2026, indicating stronger policy transmission and more disciplined liquidity management within the economy. Another major achievement mentioned in the report was the rebuilding of Nigeria’s external reserves, which increased to about $46.7 billion by late 2025, the highest level recorded in nearly seven years. This reserve level was enough to provide more than ten months of import cover, strengthening the country’s ability to withstand external economic shocks. Apart from monetary adjustments, the CBN also introduced significant institutional and governance reforms. These included the reduction of quasi-fiscal activities, stronger regulatory supervision of financial institutions, and improved transparency in policy communication to the public and investors. The bank also launched a bank recapitalisation programme aimed at strengthening the Nigerian banking sector, with several financial institutions already meeting the new capital requirements ahead of the March 2026 deadline. In addition, improvements in financial system integrity were recognised, including Nigeria’s removal from the grey list of the Financial Action Task Force, as well as positive evaluations from global organisations such as the International Monetary Fund, which acknowledged the progress made in economic reforms and policy discipline. Despite these achievements, the report noted that Nigeria still faces important challenges, including maintaining the decline in inflation, completing banking sector reforms, and strengthening institutional capacity to sustain long-term growth. Nevertheless, the magazine concluded that the actions taken by the Central Bank of Nigeria in the last two years have been exceptional, showing a strong commitment to restoring economic stability and creating a solid foundation for sustainable development in the country.
Kindly Share:
Vice President Kashim Shettima is scheduled to officially receive the Governor of Zamfara State, Dauda Lawal, into the All Progressives Congress (APC) during a planned political event taking place on Tuesday in Gusau, the capital city of the state. The announcement was made by the Zamfara State Chairman of the APC, Tukur Maikatako, who confirmed that the Vice President will lead members of the party’s national leadership to the state in order to conduct the formal reception ceremony. According to him, the visit is part of a broader effort by the party to reinforce unity, strengthen cooperation among members, and expand political inclusiveness across Zamfara State. Speaking during a stakeholders’ gathering held in Gusau on Saturday, Maikatako explained that the planned visit represents a significant moment for the party, especially as it aims to rebuild internal cohesion and create a stronger political structure ahead of future elections. He noted that the presence of the Vice President highlights the importance the party places on the development of the state and the need for collective participation by all members. Maikatako described the occasion as an opportunity to welcome back a political figure who had previously been associated with the party, stressing that the APC remains open to individuals who are committed to governance, progress, and national development. He added that the leadership of the party believes that unity among members will play a key role in strengthening its influence not only within Zamfara but also across the country. The state chairman further urged party supporters from all parts of the state to participate actively in the reception ceremony. He specifically called on members from the 147 wards spread across the 14 local government areas to attend the event in large numbers, explaining that the visit is expected to boost the party’s popularity and reinforce its position ahead of the 2027 general elections. According to him, the leadership of the APC is focused on building a stronger political family where disagreements are resolved through dialogue and cooperation. He emphasised that putting aside internal divisions will help the party perform better in future electoral contests and ensure that its policies are effectively implemented for the benefit of the people. Maikatako also reiterated that the party’s main objective is to promote the growth and prosperity of Zamfara State while contributing to the overall progress of Nigeria. He encouraged members to remain committed to party ideals and to engage their communities positively in order to attract more supporters and promote harmony within the political structure. He concluded by stating that the upcoming visit by the Vice President is not only a ceremonial event but also a strategic move aimed at consolidating the party’s strength, encouraging loyalty among members, and preparing the APC for greater political success in the coming years.
Kindly Share:
The President of the United States, Donald Trump, on Saturday issued a strict 48-hour warning to Iran, demanding that the country immediately reopen the vital shipping route known as the Strait of Hormuz or risk having its energy infrastructure destroyed. The warning came at the same time that Tehran carried out one of its most damaging military attacks against Israel since the conflict began. The strong ultimatum was delivered only a day after the US leader suggested that he might consider reducing military activity following nearly three weeks of intense fighting in the region. However, tensions rose again as the crucial oil transit corridor remained practically shut, while additional American Marines were reportedly being deployed toward the Middle East to strengthen US presence. Posting on the social media platform Truth Social, Trump declared that the United States would strike Iranian power facilities if the strait was not fully reopened within the stated deadline. He warned that the operation would begin with the largest energy installation first, emphasizing that the action would be swift and overwhelming if Iran failed to comply before the deadline, which he indicated would expire late Monday according to the timestamp of his message. Iran’s Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, responded by stating that restrictions in the waterway were only applied to ships belonging to countries involved in military actions against Iran. He added that vessels from nations that remained neutral in the conflict would continue to receive assistance and safe passage. Following the American warning, Iran’s military released a statement through the Fars news agency saying that any attack on Iranian infrastructure would result in retaliation against energy facilities and desalination plants connected to the United States and its allies in the region. The warning from Washington came shortly after two Iranian missiles struck southern parts of Israel, leaving more than one hundred people injured in what officials described as the most destructive assault since the war started. Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, immediately promised a response on every front, signaling that further escalation was likely. Reports indicated that the missiles managed to bypass Israel’s defense systems, causing severe damage to residential structures and leaving large craters in the affected areas. Emergency services confirmed that dozens of civilians were injured in the town of Arad, with several in serious condition. Earlier in the day, additional casualties were reported in Dimona, where footage showed extensive destruction, including debris, damaged buildings, and twisted metal scattered across the impact site. Dimona is widely believed to host Israel’s only nuclear-related facility, although the country has never officially confirmed possessing nuclear weapons. Military officials later confirmed that one of the missiles directly struck a building in the area, causing injuries at several locations, including a young boy who suffered serious wounds from shrapnel. Rescue workers continued searching through the ruins of damaged buildings as the situation remained tense. Netanyahu described the evening as extremely difficult and later confirmed that Israeli forces had launched new airstrikes targeting locations in Tehran. Iran claimed that the strike near Dimona was retaliation for earlier attacks on its nuclear facility in Natanz. The country’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, also known as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, said its forces also targeted additional towns in southern Israel and military-related locations in Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates. After the incident involving Natanz, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Grossi, repeated calls for restraint, warning that continued military action could increase the risk of a nuclear accident. The Natanz facility contains underground centrifuges used for uranium enrichment as part of Iran’s disputed nuclear program, and it had already suffered damage earlier in the conflict. Israel denied responsibility for the Natanz explosion but confirmed that it had carried out strikes on a research facility in Tehran that it claimed was linked to the development of components for ballistic missiles. Rising tension around Hormuz The destruction seen in Israel followed weeks of heavy bombardment carried out by US and Israeli forces, which appeared to have had limited success in stopping Iran’s ability to launch missile and drone attacks throughout the region. Iran also attempted a long-range missile strike against the joint US-UK base on Diego Garcia, located thousands of kilometers away in the Indian Ocean. According to officials, the attack did not succeed, but it would have been the longest-range strike ever attempted by Iran if it had reached its target. The United Arab Emirates reported that it faced aerial threats after Iran warned regional countries not to allow attacks to be launched from their territory near the Strait of Hormuz. Iran’s control of the waterway has significantly disrupted global oil transport, as the strait normally carries a large portion of the world’s crude oil supply. The situation caused oil prices to surge, with Brent crude rising above one hundred dollars per barrel, raising serious concerns about the global economy. Several world leaders released a joint statement condemning what they described as the effective closure of the strait. The statement, signed by multiple countries including the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Australia, South Korea, Bahrain, and the UAE, expressed readiness to support efforts that would ensure safe navigation through the region. Trump also criticized some NATO allies, accusing them of not doing enough to secure the shipping route and urging them to take stronger action. Analysts note Iran’s endurance Security experts say Iran has shown unexpected resilience despite losing several senior leaders during the conflict. Analysts noted that the country’s ability to continue launching attacks suggests that its military capacity remains stronger than initially predicted. Researchers at the policy institute Chatham House said the situation demonstrated that Iran’s response capability had not been fully weakened and that the conflict could continue longer than expected. Meanwhile, people in Tehran marked the end of Ramadan while the war entered another week. Traditionally, the country’s supreme leader leads Eid prayers, but the current leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, has not appeared in public since taking power after the death of his father,
Kindly Share:
The recent ruling by the Confederation of African Football (CAF) to withdraw Senegal’s Africa Cup of Nations title has generated widespread debate across the football world. The decision, which was delivered weeks after the conclusion of the tournament, has raised serious questions about officiating, governance, and the application of the Laws of the Game in African competitions. Earlier in the week, CAF officially confirmed that Senegal would no longer be recognised as champions of the Africa Cup of Nations, following a judgement connected to the dramatic final played against Morocco. The match, which had already been described as one of the most tense and emotional finals in recent history, ended in controversy after a disputed penalty decision late in stoppage time. According to the ruling from CAF’s appeal committee, the Senegal national team forfeited the match when players walked off the pitch in protest after the referee awarded a penalty to Morocco. The incident happened in the closing moments of the game and caused a delay before the match eventually continued. The decision to overturn the result has surprised many observers, especially because the verdict was delivered nearly two months after the final had already been played and completed. Football analyst and author Solace Chukwu described the ruling as unexpected and troubling while speaking to LMSINT MEDIA.He explained that the judgement appeared suddenly without any prior public indication that such a decision was being considered. He noted that the situation felt unusual because there had been no earlier reports suggesting that CAF was reviewing the outcome of the match. According to him, the announcement seemed to arrive without warning, which has contributed to the confusion surrounding the case. Chukwu also stated that the ruling could damage the image of African football internationally, as decisions of this magnitude are usually expected to follow clear procedures and timelines. The delay in delivering the verdict has made the situation more difficult for fans and stakeholders to accept. Another issue that has drawn attention is the length of time it took for CAF to reach a conclusion. Questions have been raised about why the appeal process lasted several weeks, especially when reports suggested that the committee responsible for the decision was not fully constituted at the time the verdict was issued. Observers believe that the long wait has increased the controversy, as tournament results are normally considered final shortly after the match unless there is immediate disciplinary action. Reactions from supporters, analysts, and former players across Africa and beyond have been divided. Some believe the ruling sets a worrying example for future competitions, while others argue that governing bodies must strictly enforce regulations regardless of the circumstances. Critics say the decision could harm CAF’s credibility and reinforce long-standing concerns about fairness and transparency in continental football administration. There are also claims from some commentators that the outcome may create the impression that certain nations receive favourable treatment, a perception that CAF has faced in the past. In addition, some experts argue that results should be determined on the field of play whenever possible, rather than being changed later through administrative decisions. They warn that revisiting completed matches could encourage protests and tactical disputes in future tournaments. Following the ruling, the Senegalese Football Federation announced plans to challenge the decision at the Court of Arbitration for Sport. The case is expected to focus on whether CAF correctly applied its competition rules and whether the referee’s authority during the match should have been considered final. Chukwu believes Senegal may have strong grounds for appeal, pointing out that the official Laws of the Game normally take priority in match situations. He also noted that the team did not leave the stadium entirely, but only stepped away from the pitch during the protest, which may affect how the incident is interpreted. Another important detail is that the match eventually continued after the interruption, with both teams returning to play additional minutes to determine the result. Because the referee allowed the game to resume, some analysts argue that the match cannot later be classified as abandoned. Under football regulations, the referee is responsible for deciding whether a match should be stopped permanently. Since the official continued the game, this point could become a key argument when the case is reviewed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport. As the situation develops, the controversy has become one of the most talked-about issues in recent African football history. The final outcome of the appeal could have long-term consequences for how disputes are handled in future CAF competitions. For more information about football rules and governance, see the official website of FIFA which explains the Laws of the Game and competition regulations used worldwide.
Kindly Share:
Political realignments have intensified across Nigeria in recent weeks as preparations for the 2027 general elections gather momentum. Governors, legislators, and influential party figures have continued to change political platforms, a development analysts describe as a calculated repositioning that is gradually reshaping the nation’s political structure. On Wednesday, March 11, 2026, the House of Representatives approved an amendment to certain sections of the Electoral Act aimed at criminalizing dual political party membership. The decision is widely interpreted as an effort to reduce opportunistic defections and enforce discipline among politicians ahead of the forthcoming elections. According to the revised provision, anyone found holding membership in more than one political party could face a fine of N10 million, a prison term of up to two years, or both penalties. The amendment also declares any form of dual party membership invalid and without legal effect. Legal analysts believe the amendment reflects the determination of lawmakers to strengthen internal party stability and safeguard the mandate given by voters during elections. Legal framework and limits of existing laws Nigeria’s Constitution already contains provisions that address political defections. Section 68(1)(g) states that any legislator who abandons the political party that sponsored their election may lose the seat, except in situations where there is a confirmed division within the party. Although the Electoral Act supports this constitutional provision, enforcement has often been inconsistent, allowing politicians to switch parties without serious consequences. Barrister Abdulrazak Boye Folorunsho, a legal practitioner based in Minna, told DAILY POST that repeated defections weaken democratic institutions. He explained that moving from one party to another reduces the strength of opposition parties and damages the democratic system, adding that failure to enforce existing laws can suppress the will of the electorate. Folorunsho further observed that legislators sometimes face sanctions, while governors often escape penalties, creating an uneven level of accountability. Increase in defections across different states Political defections usually increase between twelve and eighteen months before general elections, as politicians attempt to secure advantage ahead of party primaries. Niger State In Niger State, Adamu Tanko, who represents Suleja/Gurara/Tafa Federal Constituency, left the PDP for the APC in March 2025. Around the same period, former lawmaker Abdullahi Ricco also changed party affiliation. Several other politicians in the state switched parties at different times, showing a wider pattern of political adjustment ahead of the 2027 elections. Some residents expressed dissatisfaction over the situation. A Suleja resident, Aisha Musa, stated that she voted based on party promises, and the decision of elected officials to move to another party without consulting voters feels like a betrayal. Analysts said the timing of these defections suggests that many politicians are aligning with federal authority to secure political survival rather than acting on ideology or public demand. Adamawa State Adamawa experienced one of the most significant political shifts. In February 2026, Speaker Wesley Bathiya and about fifteen lawmakers resigned from the PDP and joined the APC, citing internal disputes within their former party. Shortly afterward, Governor Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri also defected to the APC along with members of the state executive council and several local government chairmen. This coordinated move significantly altered the political balance in the state ahead of 2027. Opposition figures argued that the change was motivated by strategy rather than public interest and warned that it could weaken the influence of opposition parties. Federal Capital Territory Senator Ireti Kingibe moved from the Labour Party to the ADC in late 2025. Political observers described the move as a strategic decision aimed at aligning with a party believed to have stronger national influence. Plateau, Rivers, Enugu, Delta and Akwa Ibom States Between April and December 2025, several governors changed party affiliation, including Caleb Mutfwang (Plateau), Siminalayi Fubara (Rivers), Peter Mbah (Enugu), Sheriff Oborevwori (Delta), and Umo Eno (Akwa Ibom), all of whom moved to the APC. Opposition leaders criticized the development, saying the decisions appeared politically motivated and did not reflect the wishes of voters. Analysts said many governors prefer to align with the federal government before elections to gain political advantage and access to resources. Civil society groups also warned that frequent defections weaken democratic accountability and reduce the strength of opposition parties at the state level. Kano State In January 2026, Governor Abba Yusuf left the NNPP for the APC along with several lawmakers and local government officials. Observers described the move as another example of political alignment ahead of elections. Defections also recorded in the National Assembly The National Assembly has also seen several defections. In March 2026, Senators Amos Yohanna, Aminu Iya Abbas, and Ikra Aliyu Bilbis left the PDP for the APC, with their letters officially read during plenary by Senate President Godswill Akpabio. Earlier, Senators Shuaibu Lau and Haruna Manu from Taraba State also joined the APC, increasing the party’s numerical strength in the Senate. Analysts believe these changes are part of efforts to influence legislative control before the 2027 elections. Hidden negotiations behind party switching Many defections are the result of negotiations that are not visible to the public. Political insiders in Niger, Adamawa, and other states told DAILY POST that politicians often consider which party can provide better access to federal support, protection from internal disputes, and stronger chances of re-election. Some defections are timed to affect party primaries or local government elections, indicating that survival strategy often plays a bigger role than ideology. Sources also said discussions sometimes involve federal officials and party leaders, showing that many defections are carefully coordinated. Experts speak on survival politics Dr Dominic Alancha, political analyst and Convener of Concerned APC Stakeholders, North Central, Benue State, said that economic reforms and increased allocations to states under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu encouraged some governors to align with the ruling party, noting that survival is often a major factor. Dr Abdullah Mohammed Jabi, Chairman of the Campaign for Democracy, North Central zone, stated that ideology rarely drives defections, adding that when opposition parties fail to organize properly, members feel forced to leave, which voters see as a
Kindly Share:
The United States Department of Defense is reportedly preparing a request for an additional $200 billion budget increase to support the ongoing military confrontation with Iran. The proposal is expected to generate strong debate in the United States Congress, where lawmakers must approve any new federal spending before it becomes effective. According to a senior official within the administration, the funding proposal has already been forwarded to the White House for review, although final figures are still being discussed internally. During a recent press briefing, U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth declined to confirm the exact amount being requested, explaining that the numbers may still change as negotiations continue among government officials. Hegseth stated that military operations require substantial financial resources, emphasizing that funding is necessary to maintain operational strength, supply equipment, and support deployed troops. He also noted that the administration intends to cooperate with members of Congress to ensure that the armed forces receive the resources required to continue their mission. This new request comes in addition to the large defence budget that was approved last year as part of former President Donald Trump’s tax and spending legislation. With the United States national debt already exceeding $39 trillion, the proposal is expected to face resistance from fiscal conservatives who are concerned about government spending, as well as from Democratic lawmakers who are calling for greater accountability and transparency regarding the objectives of the conflict. Another issue raising concern among legislators is that Congress has not officially authorised the war, which has led to growing tension on Capitol Hill about the legal basis, strategy, and long-term goals of the military campaign. The funding request was first reported by The Washington Post, which cited officials familiar with the proposal. Members of Congress have already expressed different opinions about the request. Representative Ken Calvert, who supervises defence appropriations in the House of Representatives, indicated that additional funding may be necessary to restore military stockpiles and maintain readiness. In contrast, Representative Betty McCollum criticized the proposal, stating that Congress should not approve unlimited spending without receiving clear explanations about how the money will be used. House Speaker Mike Johnson also commented on the situation, describing the global security environment as increasingly dangerous, but he explained that he has not yet reviewed the complete funding proposal and would wait for detailed information before making a decision. The proposed funding increase is expected to lead to complicated bipartisan negotiations in Congress, with disagreements likely to focus on balancing military priorities with domestic spending needs, as lawmakers debate how best to manage national security while controlling the federal budget.
