Nigerian actor and content creator Adebowale Adedayo, popularly known as Mr Macaroni, has defended his decision not to acknowledge Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu at a recent public gathering. Addressing the controversy on X (formerly Twitter), Mr Macaroni stated that he stands by his choice and remains unwavering in his principles. Mr Macaroni Responds to Backlash On Monday, Mr Macaroni dismissed criticism regarding his stance, making it clear that he would still not greet the governor if given another opportunity. “This is the last time I will speak on this matter. It is not worth my peace of mind. Since people won’t stop attacking me for not greeting Governor Sanwo-Olu, I will maintain my stand. Even if he calls me next time, I won’t respond. Let those who are upset cry today, tomorrow, and forever,” he stated. Advocating for Accountability in Governance A staunch advocate for good governance and human rights, Mr Macaroni expressed disappointment in Nigerians who defend political leaders rather than holding them accountable for the economic struggles in the country. “The people are suffering! Prices of essential goods have skyrocketed. Instead of demanding accountability from your leaders, you choose to blindly defend them,” he wrote. Exposing Political Hypocrisy The comedian also called out individuals who publicly criticize politicians but secretly seek financial benefits from them. “Some people condemn their state governors daily but later collect envelopes behind closed doors to praise them. It frustrates them to see that not everyone is for sale,” he remarked. Rejecting Blind Loyalty Mr Macaroni further criticized what he described as blind political loyalty, urging Nigerians to recognize the power they hold over elected officials. “These leaders have no integrity, yet people worship and defend them like servants instead of demanding accountability. This is why Nigeria remains stagnant,” he added. Standing by His Principles Despite facing frequent online attacks, Mr Macaroni affirmed that he would never compromise his values. “I am no saint, nor anyone’s hero. I act based on my beliefs. The constant criticism can be exhausting, but betraying my conscience is never an option,” he concluded. For further insights on governance and civic responsibility, visit BBC News for more updates on Nigerian politics. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Samuel Anyanwu Rejects Unauthorized PDP NEC Meeting Postponement The internal turmoil within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has intensified as the battle for the position of National Secretary continues between Senator Samuel Anyanwu and Hon. Sunday Udeh-Okoye. The latest dispute emerged after Udeh-Okoye issued a statement announcing the rescheduling of the party’s National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting from March 15 to May 15, 2025. However, Anyanwu swiftly countered the announcement, asserting that Udeh-Okoye lacks the legal authority to issue such directives. In a formal letter addressed to PDP NEC members, Board of Trustees (BoT) members, party governors, and other stakeholders, Anyanwu declared that Udeh-Okoye is neither the legitimate PDP National Secretary nor a recognized member of the National Working Committee (NWC). As such, he holds no official capacity to alter party proceedings. Anyanwu criticized the notice, which had been distributed through the PDP’s official Publicity Directorate under Udeh-Okoye’s name and title. He urged all party members to disregard the statement, labeling it as unauthorized and misleading. Anyanwu’s Official Memo to PDP Leadership In response to the controversial announcement, Anyanwu issued an official memo titled “Re: Notice of 99th National Executive Committee Meeting.” The letter reads in part: “My attention has been drawn to an unauthorized notice regarding the NEC meeting, signed by Rt. Hon. S. K. E. Udeh-Okoye, falsely designating himself as the PDP National Secretary. Party leaders, NEC members, BoT, Governors’ Forum, and the general public should disregard this misleading statement, as it originates from an individual with no official party mandate.” Violation of Legal Directives and Court Orders Furthermore, Anyanwu accused Udeh-Okoye of violating a court injunction that explicitly restrains him from claiming the title of PDP National Secretary pending an appeal at the Supreme Court. “The unauthorized issuance of official party documents under a false title is a clear violation of legal proceedings and a direct contempt of judicial authority,” Anyanwu stated. He further alleged that Udeh-Okoye’s actions are deliberately orchestrated to destabilize PDP, thereby jeopardizing its unity and credibility. He cautioned against engaging in activities that could weaken the party’s standing in the public eye. Recognition by INEC and Party Leadership Reiterating his legitimate position, Anyanwu emphasized that he remains the only duly elected PDP National Secretary, as he was elected at a national convention and recognized by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). He reassured members that an official date for the NEC meeting would be communicated through proper channels. For further details on PDP’s internal affairs, visit Peoples Democratic Party Official Website. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
A House of Law or a Theatre of Controversy? The Nigerian National Assembly, once regarded as a symbol of democracy, has become entangled in a web of scandals and public drama. The institution, meant to uphold the rule of law, is now the epicenter of a bitter dispute between Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and Senate President Godswill Akpabio. What should have been a legislative debate turned into a national spectacle involving allegations of sexual harassment, paid protests, and public ridicule. This controversy unfolded in Abuja, where protest groups clashed in a chaotic scene that resembled a scripted movie. The streets surrounding the National Assembly became battlegrounds for opposing demonstrators—some rallying behind Akpoti-Uduaghan, while others pledged allegiance to Akpabio. The tension escalated when security forces deployed tear gas to disperse protesters, highlighting the growing political unrest in Nigeria’s legislative chambers. The Allegations That Sparked a Firestorm Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan first accused Akpabio of sexual harassment in a national TV broadcast before taking the issue to the Senate plenary. This marked a historic moment in Nigerian democracy, being the first open plenary accusation of such a nature against a sitting Senate President. Instead of prompting an investigation, the response was a mix of technical dismissals and political maneuvering. The Ethics Committee quickly ruled that the senator’s petition was ‘Dead on Arrival’ due to procedural errors and an existing court case. This ruling, however, did little to quell public outrage, as many saw it as an attempt to silence serious allegations without due process. A Show of Paid Protests As tensions mounted, Abuja’s streets witnessed a display of orchestrated loyalty. Protesters, mostly women in matching outfits, were seen waving banners supporting either Akpabio or Akpoti-Uduaghan. However, viral videos exposed the artificial nature of these demonstrations. In one video, a protester was asked why she supported Akpabio. She hesitated and admitted, “I don’t know much about the details.” Another confessed, “We were paid N5,000 to come here,” further confirming suspicions of sponsored protests. This revelation only added to the disgrace surrounding the controversy. National and International Backlash Veteran journalist Reuben Abati, co-host of Arise TV’s The Morning Show, strongly criticized the spectacle. “For the first time since 1999, a Senate President has been accused in open plenary of sexual harassment. What’s even more embarrassing is that this happened in the presence of a UK parliamentary delegation,” he remarked. The presence of British lawmakers, including MP Kate Osamor, added international scrutiny to Nigeria’s political turmoil. The event showcased not just internal dysfunction but also raised concerns about the integrity of Nigeria’s legislative process on the global stage. A Legislative Body Losing Credibility Rather than addressing the allegations transparently, senators engaged in legal technicalities, citing parliamentary rules such as Order 40, Sub 4, to dismiss the petition. This procedural focus, rather than an investigation, fueled the perception that Nigeria’s lawmakers prioritize self-preservation over accountability. The controversy also underscored how economic hardship is weaponized in Nigeria’s political landscape. Many protesters admitted to participating due to financial incentives, highlighting the deeper issue of poverty-driven political manipulation. The Bigger Picture: A Struggling Democracy Activists and social commentators have condemned the events, calling for legislative reforms and accountability in governance. Human rights advocate Amina Yusuf pointed out, “Poverty is being used as a tool to manipulate the masses. People are easily bought to support any cause, even if it goes against their interests.” Meanwhile, public frustration continues to grow, with many Nigerians demanding a thorough and unbiased investigation into the allegations. As security forces struggle to maintain order, the National Assembly faces a choice—either uphold its duty to the people or continue down a path of political theatrics. Conclusion: A Call for Leadership and Justice The unfolding crisis at the National Assembly is a stark reminder of the need for responsible leadership and transparency. As Nigeria grapples with economic and political challenges, its lawmakers must rise above petty disputes and focus on governance. If this issue remains unresolved, it will only deepen the trust deficit between the government and the people. The National Assembly must reclaim its dignity and prioritize accountability over political games. BBC News – Nigeria Politics READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
The Nigerian House of Representatives recently took a significant step towards enhancing election transparency by passing a bill for the second reading. This bill seeks to establish an Independent Authority responsible for the registration, regulation, and funding of political parties in Nigeria, effectively reducing the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) control over political parties. What the Bill Proposes Co-sponsored by Speaker Tajudeen Abbas and Marcus Onobun from Edo State, the bill aims to shift critical responsibilities from INEC to a new independent body. Key proposals of the bill include: Why an Independent Authority? During the presentation, Marcus Onobun emphasized the need for a separation of powers. He argued that allowing INEC to both regulate political parties and conduct elections could compromise election integrity. Establishing a separate authority would ensure compliance with constitutional requirements and promote fairer electoral processes. Next Steps for the Bill After a voice vote by Speaker Abbas, the bill received overwhelming support and was referred to the Committees on Electoral Matters and Political Party Matters for further legislative action. If passed into law, this bill could transform Nigeria’s political landscape by providing a more impartial and effective regulatory framework. For more information on Nigeria’s electoral laws, visit INEC’s official website. This development is a critical move toward a more transparent electoral process in Nigeria. Stay updated on this and other political news by following LMSINT MEDIA for accurate and timely insights. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
The Martin Amaewhule-led faction of the Rivers State House of Assembly has issued a 48-hour ultimatum to Governor Siminalayi Fubara, demanding that he formally present the 2025 appropriation bill. The directive was given during the group’s plenary session on Monday, further intensifying the state’s political crisis. Rivers State Political Rift Deepens The ongoing power struggle in Rivers State continues to escalate, as the assembly remains sharply divided. The faction led by Amaewhule is aligned with the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, while the opposing group, led by Victor Oko-Jumbo, remains loyal to Governor Fubara. In January 2025, Fubara had already signed the 2025 budget into law after it was approved by the Oko-Jumbo-led faction. However, the Amaewhule-led lawmakers insist that the governor must formally present the bill before them, underscoring the deepening tensions between the two rival camps. Implications of the Budget Presentation Demand The demand for Fubara’s compliance highlights the broader political battle within Rivers State’s legislature. The confrontation between Governor Fubara and his predecessor, Wike, has further fueled uncertainty regarding governance and legislative authority in the state. According to a Vanguard report, Governor Fubara also announced that the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC) will conduct fresh elections for local government councils. This follows the Supreme Court’s rulings on Rivers State’s prolonged political crisis. Governor Fubara’s Response to Supreme Court Ruling In a statewide broadcast on Sunday, Governor Fubara acknowledged the Supreme Court’s decision while expressing his administration’s disagreement with the ruling. However, he emphasized his commitment to upholding the rule of law. He confirmed that his government would study and implement the judgment once the certified true copies are obtained, expected by Friday, March 7, 2025. As a temporary measure, Fubara directed the Heads of Local Government Administration to assume control of the 23 LGAs, pending fresh elections. Additionally, he ordered outgoing local government chairmen to hand over power by Monday, March 3, 2025. “Given the outlawing of caretaker arrangements in the local government system, I hereby direct the Heads of Local Government Administration to immediately take over the administration of the 23 local government councils pending the conduct of fresh elections by RSIEC,” Fubara stated. Vanguard News READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Lagos Assembly Leadership Crisis: Obasa’s Return Sparks Controversy In a dramatic turn of events, the former Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Mudashiru Obasa, has declared his return as head of the legislative body, despite his removal on January 13, 2025, over allegations of misconduct. Representing Agege Constituency I, Obasa insists that his impeachment was invalid as due process was not followed. He argues that his removal occurred in his absence while he was outside Nigeria, and he strongly opposes the militarization of the Assembly Complex during the process. However, lawmakers supporting the newly elected Speaker, Mojisola Meranda of Apapa Constituency I, reject Obasa’s claims, asserting that Meranda remains the legitimate leader. Meranda’s appointment marked a historic moment as she became the first female speaker in the history of Lagos State. Escalating Tensions and Legal Battle The ongoing power struggle has heightened political tensions in Lagos. Security forces and legislative staff clashed on February 17, 2025, amid the crisis. In a legal twist, 36 state lawmakers, including Meranda, appeared before an Ikeja court following Obasa’s lawsuit challenging his impeachment. The court has scheduled a hearing for March 7, leaving the situation unresolved and possibly escalating further. Reports suggest that the Governor’s Advisory Council (GAC), a political structure established by President Bola Tinubu since his tenure as Lagos governor in 1999, played a role in Obasa’s removal. It is alleged that some GAC members pushed for his impeachment after grievances against him were reported to Tinubu. The accusations against Obasa include insubordination toward Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu and alleged financial mismanagement within the Assembly. GAC Chairman Tajudeen Olusi Speaks on the Crisis Tajudeen Olusi, the Chairman of GAC, has shed light on the ongoing impasse in an exclusive interview. With a robust political background dating back to his time as a lawmaker under the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN), Olusi addressed speculations of internal power struggles within the GAC. He dismissed claims that there is an attempt to undermine Tinubu’s leadership, stating that such rumors are unfounded. Olusi revealed that, three years ago, he proposed that GAC members above 80 should step aside for younger politicians. However, this motion was met with resistance. Reflecting on the current crisis, he emphasized the importance of the GAC’s role in resolving disputes, citing their intervention in past conflicts between Sanwo-Olu and Obasa over commissioner nominations. The Lagos Assembly’s Institutional Challenge According to Olusi, the Lagos Assembly operates under constitutional provisions, though it functions semi-independently. He acknowledged Obasa’s willingness to find a resolution but warned that political opponents often exploit internal divisions to destabilize parties. He urged lawmakers to prioritize unity over factional disputes. Regarding allegations of a GAC split over Obasa’s impeachment, Olusi clarified that GAC members are not Assembly members and were not involved in the decision to remove Obasa. He emphasized that the Assembly should have consulted the party before proceeding with the impeachment. He also highlighted the APC’s responsibility in resolving internal conflicts through party mechanisms. Future of the APC and 2027 Elections Despite the ongoing turmoil, Olusi remains optimistic about APC’s future. He emphasized the importance of party unity and governance, expressing hope that President Tinubu will continue leading the country effectively. He acknowledged that political disputes are inevitable but stressed that party structures exist to mediate and resolve conflicts efficiently. Conclusion The leadership crisis in the Lagos State House of Assembly remains unresolved, with Obasa challenging his removal and GAC distancing itself from the controversy. As the court prepares to hear the case, political analysts predict that the outcome will significantly impact Lagos politics and the APC’s future in the state. For now, all eyes are on the judicial process and the role of party leadership in restoring stability. Read more on Lagos State Politics READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Ekaette Akpabio, the wife of Senate President Godswill Akpabio, has filed multiple legal cases against Kogi Central Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, accusing her of defamation and seeking N250 billion in damages. The lawsuits stem from comments Akpoti-Uduaghan made during an interview on Arise TV, where she claimed that Senate President Akpabio had made inappropriate advances toward her, both in his office and at his residence in Akwa Ibom. In response, Ekaette Akpabio strongly denied these allegations, emphasizing that her husband is a man of integrity. She dismissed the claims as “false and baseless.” Taking legal action, Ekaette filed a fundamental rights lawsuit at the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court. She argued that the senator’s statements subjected her and her children to “emotional and psychological distress.” As part of the lawsuit, she has requested a restraining order to prevent Akpoti-Uduaghan from making any further “malicious and defamatory” remarks that violate her fundamental rights. The legal claim also includes a demand for N250 billion in exemplary, punitive, aggravated, and general damages. Ekaette Akpabio insists that Akpoti-Uduaghan’s statements have significantly tarnished her reputation and that of her family, causing public disgrace and personal harm. Additionally, she has petitioned the court to compel the senator to issue a public apology, which should be published in two widely read national newspapers. The lawsuit further requests an additional N1 billion in punitive and exemplary damages to compensate for the harm caused by the defamatory claims. She has also called for a perpetual injunction to permanently restrain Akpoti-Uduaghan from making further damaging statements against her family. As of now, Senate President Godswill Akpabio has not publicly addressed the accusations made by Akpoti-Uduaghan. Learn more about defamation laws in Nigeria READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
ABUJA – In a bold move towards inclusive governance, the Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Rt. Hon. Benjamin Okezie Kalu, has called for the urgent passage of the Seat Reservation for Women Bill (HB1349). The bill is designed to address gender disparity in Nigerian politics, promoting fairness and national development. Speaking at a 3-day workshop organized for the National Women Leaders Forum (NWLF) in Abuja, Kalu highlighted a significant gap in female political representation. He revealed that 15 Nigerian states currently have no female lawmakers, while at the national level, women account for only 3.6% of the Senate and 4.7% of the House of Representatives. “This imbalance is more than a statistic—it is a barrier to national progress,” Kalu emphasized. A Strategic Move Toward Gender Equality The Seat Reservation for Women Bill (HB1349), championed by Kalu, seeks to reserve seats for women in both National and State Assemblies. This legislative move aims to dismantle systemic barriers and create a more inclusive and representative government. The bill proposes a temporary measure lasting four legislative terms (16 years), drawing inspiration from countries like Rwanda and Senegal, where similar policies have led to over 40% female representation in their parliaments (World Economic Forum). Kalu stressed that this is not an act of charity but a strategic intervention to foster national prosperity. “When half the population remains underrepresented, our democracy is incomplete,” he stated. Economic and Social Benefits of Gender-Inclusive Governance Studies have shown that nations with balanced gender representation experience higher GDP growth, improved healthcare outcomes, and more inclusive policymaking. Kalu pointed out that closing Nigeria’s gender gap could boost the national GDP by 9% by the end of 2025 (United Nations Development Programme). “Women leaders bring unique perspectives, particularly on issues like education, healthcare, and security—areas that deeply affect families and communities,” Kalu explained. Mobilizing for Change: A Collective Responsibility Kalu called on women’s groups, political parties, and grassroots networks to intensify advocacy for the bill’s passage. He urged Nigerians to see HB1349 not just as a “women’s issue” but as a national priority that demands collective action. “Mobilize all 19 political parties, engage state assemblies, and work with traditional leaders. Real change happens when public pressure matches political will,” Kalu advised. He also encouraged awareness campaigns to debunk myths surrounding reserved seats and showcase global success stories, reinforcing the idea that inclusive governance strengthens democracies. A Call for Unity and National Advancement Kalu concluded by calling for unity in pushing the bill forward. “Passing HB1349 isn’t just about increasing women’s numbers in politics—it’s about building a stronger, fairer, and more prosperous Nigeria. Together, we can create a nation where every voice counts,” he said. As Nigeria stands at this pivotal moment, the Seat Reservation for Women Bill could serve as a game-changer in fostering gender equality and unlocking the nation’s full potential. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Contrary to claims circulating on social media, students of the University of Lagos (UNILAG) have denied being asked to pay between N5,000 and N10,000 for examination dockets before gaining access to the exam halls. Investigations reveal that these allegations are unfounded, with actual charges being significantly lower. Breakdown of Docket Fees Some reports suggested that certain departments within UNILAG demanded up to N10,000 for examination dockets. However, findings by Vanguard confirm that students are only required to pay between N500 and N2,500, depending on their faculty or department. Additionally, the fees collected at the departmental level for the ongoing semester are not close to N10,000, as some had claimed. Student Reactions to the Allegations Several students have dismissed the claims, stating that the school management has not imposed such exorbitant fees. According to Kingsley Eze, a student of the Faculty of Arts: “No, students are not being charged N10,000 for dockets. I have heard that some departments require as much as N2,500, but in my department, we only paid N500 for the docket, and even that is optional.” When asked whether students who refuse to pay these fees would be denied entry into the examination hall, Eze responded: “Not at all.” Understanding the Semester Dues A 300-level student from the Faculty of Management Sciences, who chose to remain anonymous, provided insights into the dues students are expected to pay. The student also clarified that the N500 docket fee is separate and was not charged this semester. Conclusion The allegations of UNILAG students being required to pay N10,000 for dockets have been debunked. While some faculties impose minimal fees, they are significantly lower than what was initially reported. Students who had paid their semester dues earlier in the term would not face additional costs related to examination dockets. For more information on student fee structures, visit the official UNILAG website: https://unilag.edu.ng READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
A Surprising Shift in Perspective More than a decade after accusing former Vice President Atiku Abubakar of corruption in his book, The Accidental Public Servant (2013), former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, has made an unexpected reversal. He now acknowledges Atiku’s instrumental role in driving economic reforms during the administration of former President Olusegun Obasanjo. This change of stance emerged during a condolence visit to the family of the late Chief Edwin Clark, where El-Rufai highlighted Atiku’s contributions to Nigeria’s economic policies. The Previous Allegations Against Atiku El-Rufai had previously accused Atiku of corruption, claiming he was involved in dubious dealings during his tenure as vice president (1999–2007). Atiku, in response, refuted these allegations in a 2016 interview with Zero Tolerance, an Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) publication. He also accused El-Rufai of offering him shares in Transcorp Plc, a claim El-Rufai dismissed, stating that he himself had rejected similar offers. During Atiku’s tenure as vice president, he oversaw the Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE), which was responsible for Nigeria’s privatization efforts. El-Rufai, who led the agency at the time, had previously questioned Atiku’s integrity, citing various alleged financial irregularities. El-Rufai’s Acknowledgment of Atiku’s Economic Impact However, speaking at the condolence visit, El-Rufai stated that Atiku had been instrumental in shaping economic policies under Obasanjo’s administration. “Nobody gives Alhaji Atiku Abubakar the credit for economic policymaking under Obasanjo’s administration. Many of the things we did were under his leadership. Maybe because we don’t document our history, people tend to forget,” El-Rufai remarked. Political Controversy Surrounding the Condolence Visit The Transparency and Accountability Network (TAN) criticized both Atiku and El-Rufai for allegedly turning the condolence visit into a political spectacle. The group’s National Coordinator, Michael Briggs, described their remarks as disrespectful to the late Chief Clark’s family, accusing them of using the moment to promote political narratives rather than honoring the deceased. “What should have been a solemn visit became a political charade. It was a clear display of insensitivity to the grieving family,” TAN stated. The group further accused El-Rufai of leveraging the occasion to praise Atiku’s economic policies rather than focusing on the essence of the visit. Conclusion El-Rufai’s change in tone regarding Atiku’s economic influence marks a notable shift in Nigerian political dynamics. While some see it as a genuine acknowledgment of past contributions, others interpret it as a strategic political move. Regardless, this development underscores the evolving nature of political alliances and narratives in Nigeria. For further insights into Nigeria’s political history, visit BBC Africa. READ ALSO; Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
The Lagos State House of Assembly and the Department of State Services (DSS) have found themselves in a heated disagreement over the agency’s presence at the legislative complex. While the DSS maintains that its operatives were invited to provide security, lawmakers argue that the security personnel overstepped their bounds by sealing off key offices, effectively disrupting legislative activities. DSS Claims It Was Invited to Maintain Security Contrary to allegations from the lawmakers, the DSS insists it was acting based on an official request. A letter from the Acting Clerk of the Assembly, A. Ottun, dated February 14, 2025, highlighted security concerns regarding an alleged plan to reinstate impeached Speaker Mudashiru Obasa on February 18, 2025. The letter, titled “Urgent: Enhanced Security Measures for LSHA Premises”, referenced credible intelligence that suggested a potential security threat to the Assembly and its members. Addressed to the DSS Director in Lagos and other security agencies, it stated: “The impeached Speaker of Lagos State House of Assembly plans to resume office on February 18, 2025, posing a potential security threat to the Assembly and its members. We kindly request necessary measures to fortify the security of the Assembly premises starting from Sunday, February 16, 2025, by increasing security presence and enforcing strict access control.” DSS officials maintain that their presence was in direct response to this request and that their actions were in line with their security mandate. Lawmakers Decry “Democratic Invasion” Despite the DSS’ justification, lawmakers strongly condemned the agency’s conduct, describing it as “a rape on democracy, an aberration, and a national embarrassment.” Following the Assembly staff’s forceful reopening of the chamber doors, 36 lawmakers convened for a plenary session. According to them, the DSS operatives—many of whom were masked—had unlawfully occupied the premises without proper notice or explicit invitation. Legislative Committee Speaks Out Speaking on behalf of the lawmakers, Stephen Ogundipe, Chairman of the House Committee on Information, Strategy, and Security, firmly refuted the DSS’ version of events. He stated: “While it is true that the House has sought security support from the DSS in the past, previous instances have only involved security personnel stationed at the main gate of the Assembly complex to prevent unauthorized access. “At no point did the letter requesting security assistance instruct the DSS to invade the legislative chamber, lock and restrict access to the Speaker’s office, or shut down the offices of the Acting Clerk and Deputy Speaker.” Concerns Over Legislative Independence The lawmakers argue that the DSS’ involvement in sealing off legislative offices represents an undue interference in legislative affairs. They assert that the sanctity of the Lagos State House of Assembly has been compromised and that such actions constitute a direct assault on democratic governance. The standoff raises broader questions about the balance of power between security agencies and legislative institutions, highlighting the need for clear protocols when deploying security operatives within government institutions. External Reference For more on legislative security protocols, visit Nigeria’s Legislative Security Framework. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Chanel.
Kindly Share:
President Bola Tinubu has formally requested the Federal High Court in Abuja to reject a lawsuit demanding that the National Assembly initiate impeachment proceedings against him. The case, filed under suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1334/2024, was brought by legal practitioner Olukoya Ogungbeje. The Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, is named as the second defendant in the lawsuit. Allegations Against Tinubu’s Administration The plaintiff claims that the Tinubu administration systematically suppressed peaceful protests held by Nigerian citizens, thereby committing an impeachable offense. Specifically, he alleges that between August 1 and August 10, 2024, security forces violently disrupted peaceful demonstrations across the country, violating citizens’ fundamental rights. Citing Section 143 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), the plaintiff argues that the National Assembly has the constitutional power to initiate impeachment proceedings against the President for such alleged misconduct. Tinubu and AGF Challenge the Lawsuit In response, President Tinubu and the AGF jointly filed a preliminary objection, questioning the locus standi (legal standing) of the plaintiff to bring the case before the court. Their legal team, led by Sanusi Musa, SAN, contended that the suit is both incompetent and lacks merit, failing to present a legitimate cause of action that justifies judicial intervention. They further argued that: Court Urged to Strike Out the Case The defendants submitted 18 legal reasons why the court should dismiss the case outright. Among their key arguments: Supporting the defense, Gbemga Oladimeji, a principal state counsel at the Federal Ministry of Justice, affirmed in a counter affidavit that the August 2024 protests were peaceful and conducted under legal guidelines. He asserted that the Tinubu administration promotes free speech and public demonstrations within the law. Conclusion The legal battle over President Tinubu’s impeachment request remains ongoing. The court’s decision on whether to dismiss the case or proceed with hearings will set a crucial precedent regarding presidential accountability and citizens’ rights in Nigeria. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Chanel.
Kindly Share:
PDP National Secretary, Senator Samuel Anyanwu, has dismissed the PDP Governors’ Forum’s endorsement of his rival, stating that the forum has no authority over party leadership decisions. The ongoing leadership crisis within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has taken another turn, as the party’s National Secretary, Senator Samuel Anyanwu, remains resolute despite the PDP Governors’ Forum endorsing his rival. Anyanwu has dismissed the forum’s decision, insisting that he remains the legitimate National Secretary of the party. Governors’ Forum Not a Party Organ – Anyanwu Speaking in an exclusive interview with Vanguard on Friday night, Anyanwu reiterated that the PDP Governors’ Forum has no constitutional authority over party leadership decisions. “First and foremost, the PDP Governors’ Forum is not an organ of our party, so I’m unperturbed by the communique they issued after their meeting. One fact remains: I am the National Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party.” He emphasized that the Governors’ Forum is merely one of many pressure groups within the PDP and should not be mistaken for a governing body within the party’s structure. Political Motivations Behind the Endorsement According to Anyanwu, the endorsement of his rival might have been influenced by external political interests, particularly that of Governor Peter Mbah of Enugu State. He suggested that the decision could have been made to appease certain factions within the party. “Even the communique they issued is adversarial. There’s a likelihood that they did what they did to satisfy Governor Peter Mbah of Enugu State.” Legal Standing and INEC Recognition Anyanwu maintained that the judicial system remains the ultimate authority in determining his position. He cited the Appeal Court’s ruling, which granted a stay of execution on an earlier judgment, as proof that he remains in office. “The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and our courts remain supreme in such matters.” He further stated that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) only recognizes him as the PDP’s National Secretary, dismissing any attempts to replace him. “I’m complying with the court order, and in case they are not aware, INEC will not recognize any other person besides me as PDP National Secretary.” Conclusion With the PDP’s internal crisis deepening, Senator Samuel Anyanwu continues to stand his ground against the PDP Governors’ Forum. His insistence on legal backing and INEC’s recognition underscores the complexities within the party’s leadership struggle. As events unfold, it remains to be seen how the situation will be resolved within the party’s legal and political framework. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Chanel.
