Political realignments have intensified across Nigeria in recent weeks as preparations for the 2027 general elections gather momentum. Governors, legislators, and influential party figures have continued to change political platforms, a development analysts describe as a calculated repositioning that is gradually reshaping the nation’s political structure.
On Wednesday, March 11, 2026, the House of Representatives approved an amendment to certain sections of the Electoral Act aimed at criminalizing dual political party membership. The decision is widely interpreted as an effort to reduce opportunistic defections and enforce discipline among politicians ahead of the forthcoming elections.
According to the revised provision, anyone found holding membership in more than one political party could face a fine of N10 million, a prison term of up to two years, or both penalties. The amendment also declares any form of dual party membership invalid and without legal effect.
Legal analysts believe the amendment reflects the determination of lawmakers to strengthen internal party stability and safeguard the mandate given by voters during elections.
Legal framework and limits of existing laws
Nigeria’s Constitution already contains provisions that address political defections.
Section 68(1)(g) states that any legislator who abandons the political party that sponsored their election may lose the seat, except in situations where there is a confirmed division within the party.
Although the Electoral Act supports this constitutional provision, enforcement has often been inconsistent, allowing politicians to switch parties without serious consequences.
Barrister Abdulrazak Boye Folorunsho, a legal practitioner based in Minna, told DAILY POST that repeated defections weaken democratic institutions.
He explained that moving from one party to another reduces the strength of opposition parties and damages the democratic system, adding that failure to enforce existing laws can suppress the will of the electorate.
Folorunsho further observed that legislators sometimes face sanctions, while governors often escape penalties, creating an uneven level of accountability.
Increase in defections across different states
Political defections usually increase between twelve and eighteen months before general elections, as politicians attempt to secure advantage ahead of party primaries.
Niger State
In Niger State, Adamu Tanko, who represents Suleja/Gurara/Tafa Federal Constituency, left the PDP for the APC in March 2025. Around the same period, former lawmaker Abdullahi Ricco also changed party affiliation.
Some residents expressed dissatisfaction over the situation.
A Suleja resident, Aisha Musa, stated that she voted based on party promises, and the decision of elected officials to move to another party without consulting voters feels like a betrayal.
Analysts said the timing of these defections suggests that many politicians are aligning with federal authority to secure political survival rather than acting on ideology or public demand.
Adamawa State
Adamawa experienced one of the most significant political shifts.
In February 2026, Speaker Wesley Bathiya and about fifteen lawmakers resigned from the PDP and joined the APC, citing internal disputes within their former party.
Shortly afterward, Governor Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri also defected to the APC along with members of the state executive council and several local government chairmen.
This coordinated move significantly altered the political balance in the state ahead of 2027.
Opposition figures argued that the change was motivated by strategy rather than public interest and warned that it could weaken the influence of opposition parties.
Federal Capital Territory
Senator Ireti Kingibe moved from the Labour Party to the ADC in late 2025. Political observers described the move as a strategic decision aimed at aligning with a party believed to have stronger national influence.
Plateau, Rivers, Enugu, Delta and Akwa Ibom States
Between April and December 2025, several governors changed party affiliation, including Caleb Mutfwang (Plateau), Siminalayi Fubara (Rivers), Peter Mbah (Enugu), Sheriff Oborevwori (Delta), and Umo Eno (Akwa Ibom), all of whom moved to the APC.
Opposition leaders criticized the development, saying the decisions appeared politically motivated and did not reflect the wishes of voters.
Analysts said many governors prefer to align with the federal government before elections to gain political advantage and access to resources.
Kano State
In January 2026, Governor Abba Yusuf left the NNPP for the APC along with several lawmakers and local government officials.
Observers described the move as another example of political alignment ahead of elections.
Defections also recorded in the National Assembly
The National Assembly has also seen several defections.
In March 2026, Senators Amos Yohanna, Aminu Iya Abbas, and Ikra Aliyu Bilbis left the PDP for the APC, with their letters officially read during plenary by Senate President Godswill Akpabio.
Earlier, Senators Shuaibu Lau and Haruna Manu from Taraba State also joined the APC, increasing the party’s numerical strength in the Senate.
Analysts believe these changes are part of efforts to influence legislative control before the 2027 elections.
Hidden negotiations behind party switching
Many defections are the result of negotiations that are not visible to the public.
Political insiders in Niger, Adamawa, and other states told DAILY POST that politicians often consider which party can provide better access to federal support, protection from internal disputes, and stronger chances of re-election.
Some defections are timed to affect party primaries or local government elections, indicating that survival strategy often plays a bigger role than ideology.
Sources also said discussions sometimes involve federal officials and party leaders, showing that many defections are carefully coordinated.
Experts speak on survival politics
Dr Dominic Alancha, political analyst and Convener of Concerned APC Stakeholders, North Central, Benue State, said that economic reforms and increased allocations to states under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu encouraged some governors to align with the ruling party, noting that survival is often a major factor.
Dr Abdullah Mohammed Jabi, Chairman of the Campaign for Democracy, North Central zone, stated that ideology rarely drives defections, adding that when opposition parties fail to organize properly, members feel forced to leave, which voters see as a breach of trust.
Barrister Folorunsho warned that repeated defections weaken opposition parties and reduce public confidence in democracy, increasing the risk of one-party dominance.
Citizens question trust and mandate
Some citizens said constant party switching makes politicians appear opportunistic.
An Enugu resident, Chinedu Okeke, said voters often feel they voted for policies but later discover that politicians move for personal reasons.
A student in Minna, Teni Moses, said frequent defections make governance unpredictable and can slow down promised projects.
Civil society organisations also criticised the trend, saying it weakens representative democracy and reduces accountability.
Reactions from political stakeholders
Hon. Yahaya Ability, a PDP Board of Trustees member from Niger State, supported the decision of the House of Representatives to restrict defections.
He said voters elect candidates based on party platforms, and switching parties for personal interest amounts to betraying the mandate of the people.
He added that many defections are driven by survival rather than ideology and referred to past court cases where mandates were challenged after politicians changed parties.
Ability also stated that the PDP leadership is ready to support lawmakers in enforcing stricter rules.
National Treasurer of the ADC, Dr Mani Ibrahim Ahmed, said that when governors change parties, it does not automatically mean the public agrees with them.
He noted that some politicians move because of pressure or incentives, adding that electoral victory still depends on popular support.
Defections not new in Nigeria
Political defections have occurred before major elections in the past, including ahead of the 2015 and 2019 polls.
Analysts say weak party ideology and loopholes in the law have allowed the pattern to continue, with many politicians choosing to align with federal power.
How other democracies control defections
In India, anti-defection laws can automatically remove lawmakers from office.
In the United Kingdom, politicians who leave their parties often face pressure to seek fresh elections.
South Africa once allowed floor-crossing but later abolished the practice after it weakened accountability.
Compared with these countries, Nigeria’s legal system still allows flexibility that sometimes encourages political survival over party loyalty.
Effect on governance and opposition strength
Frequent defections weaken opposition parties, interrupt policy continuity, and reduce public confidence in leadership.
Analysts warn that repeated party switching can delay development projects, disrupt administration, and strengthen the ruling party.
Early calculations for 2027 already ongoing
As the 2027 election approaches, political repositioning is expected to increase.
Governors seeking second terms, lawmakers aiming for higher offices, and party leaders trying to maintain influence are already making strategic moves.
Weak party ideology, legal loopholes, and electoral calculations continue to shape political decisions.
Experts predict more defections, especially in states where opposition parties are not well organised.
A major test for Nigeria’s democracy
With defections spreading across states, legislatures, and the National Assembly, Nigeria is entering another period of intense political realignment.
The amendment to the Electoral Act will test whether stronger laws can influence political behaviour or whether opportunistic party switching will continue to dominate the country’s political environment.
Kindly Share:
Discover more from LMSINT STORE
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.