Popular Nigerian crossdresser and internet celebrity, Okuneye Idris Olarenwaju, better known by his alias Bobrisky, has once again stirred controversy online—this time taking a swipe at men living in the United Kingdom. In a bold post shared via his official Instagram account, Bobrisky labeled UK men as financially unappealing. According to him, they do not meet his personal standards of luxury and class. His comment has since triggered a wave of discussions online, especially among Nigerians in the diaspora. “UK men are too broke, avoid them,” Bobrisky declared. He further described a lifestyle he finds off-putting, claiming that most men in the UK share apartments and go as far as splitting bills, which he considers undesirable and even degrading. The lifestyle of cost-sharing among men does not align with Bobrisky’s perception of wealth or masculinity. “They share apartments and bills amongst themselves, ewwww,” he added, in an apparent expression of disgust. Standards for Suitors: Designer Brands Only Bobrisky did not stop at criticizing UK men’s financial behavior—he also laid out the minimum requirements any potential suitor must meet before approaching him. These include being clad in luxury designer clothing and accessories, particularly a Presidential Rolex wristwatch and designer slippers. “Before any UK guy can approach me, please come correct,” he said. “The least wristwatch I want to see you wear is a Presidential Rolex and designer slippers.” Justifying his expectations, Bobrisky pointed to his own lifestyle, stating that if he, as a woman, could afford and confidently wear luxury items like a Presidential Rolex, then it should be no excuse for men not to do the same. The statement has sparked a mix of reactions, with many questioning Bobrisky’s perception of wealth and class, while others defend his right to set personal preferences. The original post was shared via this X (formerly Twitter) link, now circulating widely across platforms.
Shola Balogun, a Nigerian-British officer from Bromley Police Station, was fired by the UK’s Metropolitan Police Service after reportedly biting a coworker at a birthday celebration in Bexleyheath, Kent. Senior officer Christopher McKay presided over the disciplinary hearing, which took place from October 21–23, 2024. The panel included Assessor-Detective Superintendent Kirsty Mead and IPM Amanda Harvey. The event happened on April 22, 2022, at Goals Sports Bar during a 40th birthday celebration that was attended by about 70 people. READ ALSO The hearing document states that the victim and Balogun, who are both employed at Bromley Police Station, had previously joked about but kept up a cordial working relationship. But according to reports, there was an altercation at the party when Balogun allegedly took the victim’s glasses and then bit him. after a fierce argument, on his face. Medical records verified that the victim had been bitten, despite Balogun’s denial that he had done so and his assertion that the spectacles had been removed by accident. According to the College of Policing Code of Ethics, which places a strong emphasis on upholding public trust, the panel determined that Balogun’s conduct were against police standards, specifically Discreditable Conduct. Despite glowing character recommendations from coworkers, including his inspector, the panel decided that Balogun should be fired immediately due to his prior disciplinary record and the gravity of the occurrence. According to the panel, “Dismissal Without Notice is the only appropriate and proportionate outcome in this case.” “The Panel keeps in mind what Lord Justice Maurice Kay said in the famous Salter v. Chief Constable case.” after a fierce argument, on his face. Medical records verified that the victim had been bitten, despite Balogun’s denial that he had done so and his assertion that the spectacles had been removed by accident. According to the College of Policing Code of Ethics, which places a strong emphasis on upholding public trust, the panel determined that Balogun’s conduct were against police standards, specifically Discreditable Conduct. Despite glowing character recommendations from coworkers, including his inspector, the panel decided that Balogun should be fired immediately due to his prior disciplinary record and the gravity of the occurrence. According to the panel, “Dismissal Without Notice is the only appropriate and proportionate outcome in this case.” “The Panel keeps in mind what Lord Justice Maurice Kay said in the famous Salter v. Chief Constable case.”
