The Federal High Court in Port Harcourt has fixed May 21, 2025, as the official hearing date for a constitutional case filed by Belema Briggs and other concerned citizens. The lawsuit challenges the suspension of Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, and the state House of Assembly, following the declaration of a state of emergency by President Bola Tinubu. The suit, which names President Tinubu, the National Assembly, Attorney General of the Federation Lateef Fagbemi, Retired Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas, and the Nigerian Navy as defendants, raises major constitutional questions under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria (as amended). Key Constitutional Questions Raised The plaintiffs are requesting the court’s interpretation of Sections 1, 4, 5, 11, 180, 188, and 305 of the Constitution to determine: Human Rights Implications The plaintiffs further argue that the suspension of elected officials and the installation of a Sole Administrator contradicts Article 13 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Cap A4. This article guarantees the right of citizens to participate in the government of their country. To learn more about the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, visit the African Union official site. What Happens Next? The presiding judge confirmed that all relevant parties have been duly served with court documents, and adjourned the matter to May 21, 2025, for hearing. This date marks a potentially historic judicial moment that could redefine federal and state relations in Nigeria. Related Internal Content For a deeper understanding of constitutional rights in Nigeria, visit the National Assembly website. Final Thoughts This court case is a major constitutional test for Nigeria’s democracy. At stake is the balance between federal authority and state autonomy, and whether democratic institutions can be lawfully suspended during times of crisis. Stay tuned to LMSINT MEDIA for ongoing coverage of this case and other major political developments in Nigeria. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Fubara Voices Concern Over Rivers State Political Crisis Governor Sim Fubara of Rivers State has openly expressed his distress over the current political crisis in the state. His concerns follow the declaration of a state of emergency by President Bola Tinubu, a move that has significantly impacted the state’s governance. Suspension and Leadership Transition As part of the emergency measures, Governor Fubara has been suspended from office for six months. In his place, a sole administrator has been appointed to oversee the state’s affairs. This drastic decision comes amid the escalating power struggle between Fubara and his predecessor, Nyesom Wike, the current Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). Addressing Supporters During Sallah Celebration During a Sallah homage at his private residence, Fubara addressed a gathering of Muslim faithful who came to celebrate with him. He acknowledged the difficult situation, stating: “I understand that people might assume I feel deeply troubled by these events, given the circumstances. However, despite everything, we choose to give thanks to the Almighty God.” He emphasized the importance of unity, patience, and avoiding provocation, saying that the goal of his political opponents is to destabilize the state. Call for Peaceful Resolution Fubara urged residents of Rivers State to remain peaceful and not fall into the trap of provocation. He assured them that his administration is committed to ensuring stability and maintaining Rivers State as a model for others in Nigeria. “Their objective is to create chaos and strip people of their means of livelihood, but we will not allow it. We will continue to operate peacefully and uphold the rule of law.” Implications of the Political Crisis The ongoing crisis has raised concerns about governance, security, and economic stability in Rivers State. Analysts suggest that prolonged political unrest could negatively impact the state’s development. Read more about political crisis management in Nigeria. For more updates on Nigerian politics and governance, visit our Politics News Section. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Port Harcourt, The political atmosphere in Rivers State has taken a dramatic turn as concerned elders of the state have raised an urgent alarm over the mysterious disappearance of their suspended Governor, Siminalayi Fubara. With growing uncertainty over his whereabouts, the elders are now demanding that Fubara make a live television appearance to prove he is alive and well. This unprecedented demand has sent shockwaves across the state, igniting political debates and fueling speculation about what could have happened to the embattled governor. Where is Sim Fubara? The last public appearance of Governor Fubara was weeks ago, just before he was controversially suspended from office following a heated standoff with political heavyweights. Since then, there has been radio silence. His official aides and close associates have refused to provide concrete answers, further deepening suspicions. A prominent Rivers elder, Chief Benson Orubibi, voiced the concern of many when he stated: “We have waited in vain for an update on our son, our governor. If he is fine, let him speak to us. Let him go on TV and reassure the people of Rivers State that he is alive. Until then, we cannot sit back and pretend all is well.” Conspiracy Theories and Rising Tensions The lack of communication has given rise to numerous conspiracy theories. Some political analysts speculate that Fubara is being held against his will, while others believe he has gone into hiding due to threats to his life. There are even whispers of a high-level political game at play, with external forces pulling the strings. A security expert, Dr. Emmanuel Briggs, warns that the situation, if left unaddressed, could lead to serious political instability in the region: “Rivers State has a history of intense political battles. If this situation is not handled properly, it could escalate into something much bigger, potentially leading to mass protests and unrest.” Calls for Transparency The elders of Rivers State are not alone in their demands. Civil society organizations and human rights activists have joined the call for clarity, urging the state government and security agencies to provide verifiable proof of Fubara’s safety. Renowned political commentator, Mr. Chuka Nwokedi, wrote in a recent opinion piece: “In this digital age, a governor cannot just vanish without explanation. Nigerians deserve transparency. If Sim Fubara is safe, let him address the public immediately.” (Source) The Bigger Political Picture This situation is unfolding against the backdrop of Rivers State’s long history of political turmoil. The state has been a battleground for fierce political rivalries, often marred by violence and power struggles. If history is anything to go by, the uncertainty surrounding Fubara’s absence could have long-term repercussions. As pressure mounts, all eyes are now on the Rivers State government and national authorities to break the silence and put an end to the speculation. Will Sim Fubara resurface to reassure the people, or is there more to this story than meets the eye? For now, Rivers State waits. And so does Nigeria. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
The National Assembly has approved President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State through a voice vote, sparking widespread criticism. The resolution, which led to the suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, and other elected officials for six months, also facilitated the appointment of a sole administrator. Violation of Constitutional Provisions? This decision appears to conflict with Section 305(4) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which mandates a two-thirds majority vote in both legislative chambers before such a proclamation can be upheld. Critics argue that a voice vote lacks transparency and fails to meet the constitutional threshold. Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, Peter Obi, condemned the approval, asserting that a two-thirds majority cannot be established through a voice vote. However, Senate President Godswill Akpabio countered this claim, stating that the decision was made unanimously without opposition. Senate’s Directives and Oversight Role As part of the emergency rule implementation, the National Assembly Joint Ad-hoc Committee will oversee all regulations in Rivers State. The Senate further called for the federal government to establish a reconciliation mechanism, including a Peace and Reconciliation Committee with key stakeholders, to restore stability in the state. Meanwhile, the House of Representatives modified Tinubu’s proclamation, mandating that the Rivers State Sole Administrator, Vice Admiral Ibok Ibas, report directly to the National Assembly rather than the Federal Executive Council (FEC). Key Amendments by the House of Representatives: Divisions Among Senators During Closed-Door Session Despite the Senate’s approval, reports indicate internal disagreements. According to Vanguard, only 64 senators were recorded as present, sparking concerns that a proper quorum was not met. Some senators, including Seriake Dickson (PDP, Bayelsa West), Enyinnaya Abaribe (APGA, Abia South), and Aminu Tambuwal (PDP, Sokoto South), walked out in protest. During deliberations, Senator Seriake Dickson raised a procedural concern, urging the Senate to adhere to Order 133 of its Standing Rules, which requires state-of-emergency discussions to be conducted in a closed-door session. Although initially resistant, Akpabio later acknowledged this requirement, leading to a closed-door meeting before the final decision was reached. Legal Experts and Opposition Leaders Challenge NASS Approval Legal experts have criticized the method used to approve the state of emergency. Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Prof. Sam Erugo, noted that Section 305(6) of the Constitution explicitly requires a two-thirds vote for such a decision, stating that a voice vote is legally insufficient. Peter Obi also denounced the process, arguing that using a voice vote for a decision of this magnitude undermines constitutional principles and democratic accountability. According to him, such decisions should be subjected to a recorded vote to ensure legitimacy. Implications for Rivers State and National Politics The emergency rule in Rivers State has significant political and governance implications. The involvement of the National Assembly in state governance raises concerns about federal overreach, while the removal of elected officials has sparked debates on democratic integrity. Observers are closely monitoring the situation as it unfolds, with expectations that legal and political challenges may arise in the coming weeks. For further insights on constitutional provisions and emergency rule governance, refer to this analysis by The Guardian. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Key Political Figures Oppose Rivers State Emergency Declaration In a major political development, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate Peter Obi, and ex-Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai have initiated a coalition aimed at challenging President Bola Tinubu’s administration in the 2027 elections. This was confirmed by Atiku during a press conference in Abuja, where he addressed political stakeholders from across the nation. When questioned about the intention behind the gathering, Atiku affirmed that the coalition’s objective is to remove Tinubu from office in the next election cycle. Political Leaders Condemn Tinubu’s Emergency Declaration in Rivers State Atiku, along with other coalition members, has urged Nigerians, particularly members of the National Assembly, to reject Tinubu’s recent declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State, labeling it unconstitutional. According to Atiku: “President Tinubu’s proclamation on March 18, 2025, suspending the democratically elected Governor, Deputy Governor, and State House of Assembly, is an outright violation of Nigeria’s Constitution and an attempt to impose autocratic control.” He further stated that Tinubu’s decision undermines democracy and called on Nigerians to resist what he described as an unconstitutional move. Unlawful Dismissal of Elected Officials Atiku highlighted constitutional breaches, stating that the Nigerian Constitution does not empower the President to remove an elected Governor, Deputy Governor, or the State House of Assembly under any circumstances. He referenced Section 188 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which explicitly outlines the legal procedure for removing a Governor through impeachment by the State House of Assembly. Additionally, Atiku condemned the misuse of Section 305, which allows the declaration of a state of emergency only under extreme national security threats. He asserted that Tinubu’s justification for the emergency rule in Rivers State does not meet the constitutional requirements. Judiciary and National Assembly Must Intervene The coalition is calling for immediate action from the judiciary and the National Assembly to overturn Tinubu’s directive. Atiku stressed that any declaration of emergency must be ratified by a two-thirds majority vote in both legislative chambers. If such approval is not obtained, the proclamation automatically loses its validity. “There is no war or crisis in Rivers State to warrant such an extreme measure. Instead of allowing due legal processes to resolve political disputes, the federal government is exploiting the situation for political gain,” he added. Manufactured Crisis for Political Control The coalition alleges that the crisis in Rivers State is a deliberate political maneuver designed to weaken opposition forces ahead of the 2027 elections. Atiku pointed out that similar security challenges in the past did not result in the removal of elected officials. “Even at the peak of insurgency in the North-East, the then-government did not remove governors but provided security solutions. The Rivers State issue is being exploited to serve Tinubu’s interests,” Atiku noted. Call to Action The coalition demands the immediate reinstatement of the elected Rivers State government and urges lawmakers to reject the unconstitutional action. Additionally, Atiku called on civil society organizations, political stakeholders, and citizens to defend Nigeria’s democracy against executive overreach. Historical Context: Niger Delta Unrest Atiku cautioned against political instability in the Niger Delta, a region historically fraught with conflict. He emphasized that previous administrations worked tirelessly to stabilize the area, warning that Tinubu’s actions could reignite tensions and disrupt national economic stability. Political Heavyweights Join the Movement Other key opposition figures present at the press conference included Yunusa Tanko representing Peter Obi, former SGF Babachir Lawal, ex-Kaduna Governor Nasir El-Rufai, and Peter Ahmeh, National Secretary of the Coalition of United Political Parties. Apologies were sent by notable figures such as former Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi, former Ekiti Governor Kayode Fayemi, and ex-APC National Chairman Abdullahi Adamu. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
The Federal Government, through the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, clarified that the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, played no role in the political unrest in Rivers State. The crisis, which led to President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency, has intensified debates between the federal authorities and state officials. Federal Allocations and Leadership Transition The AGF emphasized that Rivers State’s federal allocations, previously withheld due to the turmoil, would be released upon request to the newly appointed sole administrator, Vice Admiral Ibok Ibas (retd.), who was assigned by President Tinubu to oversee the state’s affairs. The government justified the emergency rule, stating it was essential to prevent further deterioration. The AGF accused the suspended governor, Siminalayi Fubara, of allegedly influencing militants to attack critical infrastructure, including oil pipelines. Clarifying Wike’s Involvement Addressing speculations, the AGF dismissed claims that FCT Minister Nyesom Wike had orchestrated the crisis. He stated that Wike was not responsible for the demolition of the Rivers State House of Assembly, the budget impasse, or the controversial appointment process of commissioners. Legal interpretations from the Supreme Court highlighted constitutional violations committed by Governor Fubara, further legitimizing the emergency rule. The AGF asserted that the governor’s actions destabilized governance, leading to the need for federal intervention. Root Cause of the Political Crisis The political turmoil in Rivers State traces back to late 2023 when governance disputes escalated. The AGF noted that Governor Fubara allegedly sidelined the legislative process, operating with only a few lawmakers instead of the full House of Assembly. This led to legal battles, with multiple Supreme Court rulings underscoring the governor’s breaches of constitutional provisions. One of the most critical findings was Fubara’s purported attempt to preempt impeachment by undermining the legislature. The AGF likened the governor’s actions to those of a despot, arguing that they rendered governance in the state ineffective. Security Concerns and Oil Pipeline Vandalism Security issues played a significant role in the federal government’s decision. The AGF alleged that Governor Fubara tacitly encouraged militant groups, failing to dissuade them from acts of sabotage. A week after he allegedly signaled his support, vital oil infrastructure was attacked, reducing Nigeria’s oil production output, which had previously increased under Tinubu’s administration. Nigeria’s economy heavily depends on oil revenue, and any threats to its infrastructure impact national stability. The AGF stated that those who sabotage the oil industry are not just enemies of Rivers State but of Nigeria as a whole. Implications and National Assembly’s Role President Tinubu’s emergency declaration awaits National Assembly approval, requiring a two-thirds majority vote. Critics argue that the decision was rushed, but the AGF countered that delaying action could have worsened the situation. The declaration also serves as a warning to other states, signaling that the federal government is prepared to take strict measures to prevent governance failures and security breakdowns. What Lies Ahead for Rivers State? With the emergency rule in place, Rivers State faces a transitional phase under the appointed administrator. The move sets a precedent for federal intervention in state governance during crises. As the National Assembly deliberates on the matter, political stakeholders remain divided on whether the action was necessary or excessive. For further insights into Nigeria’s political landscape, visit this reputable source for updates on governance and legal affairs. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
South-South Leaders Split Over Tinubu’s Intervention in Rivers Political Crisis The political landscape in Rivers State remains turbulent following President Bola Tinubu’s directive to the Pan Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF) regarding the ongoing dispute between Governor Siminalayi Fubara and Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister, Nyesom Wike. The president’s directive has triggered mixed reactions from South-South leaders, highlighting deep-seated divisions within the region. Former military governor of old Rivers State, King Alfred Diete-Spiff, and former Akwa Ibom State governor, Obong Victor Attah, led the PANDEF delegation to the Presidential Villa in Abuja. PANDEF, a coalition of traditional rulers and stakeholders from the Niger Delta, sought Tinubu’s intervention in the escalating crisis. However, rather than offering a fresh mediation approach, the president urged PANDEF leaders to return home and advise Governor Fubara to adhere to the Supreme Court ruling. Tinubu’s Stance Raises Concerns While President Tinubu emphasized the importance of the rule of law in resolving the conflict, his position has been met with criticism. According to the President of the Ijaw National Congress (INC), Prof. Benjamin Okaba, Tinubu’s directive appears to favor Wike, emboldening the FCT minister’s political stronghold in Rivers State. Okaba expressed disappointment in the way PANDEF was addressed, stating that the president’s remarks undermined genuine efforts for peace. “The president’s statement only strengthens Wike’s grip over the state’s affairs. The political tension in Rivers State is not just a legal matter but also a test of fairness and equity,” Okaba remarked. He further warned that Tinubu’s handling of the situation could determine future reactions from the Ijaw people in the 2027 elections. PANDEF’s Role in Mediation Questioned Zik Gbemre, a Niger Delta activist, voiced skepticism about PANDEF’s ability to mediate the conflict impartially. According to him, the group’s Ijaw-dominated composition could make Wike’s camp unwilling to engage in meaningful negotiations. Gbemre argued that alternative mediators should be considered to ensure a balanced resolution. Similarly, Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Uwemedimo Nwoko viewed Tinubu’s directive as unnecessary, stating that Governor Fubara has no option but to comply with the Supreme Court ruling. However, he questioned why Tinubu remained silent on Wike’s actions, despite evidence of interference in Rivers politics. Public Interest Overshadowed by Political Ambitions Former Akwa Ibom State deputy governor, Senator Chris Ekpenyong, raised concerns about the broader implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling on party defections. He questioned the fairness of allowing lawmakers who defected from the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC) to retain their seats, arguing that political interests are being prioritized over democratic principles. Ekpenyong urged Wike to cease his opposition to Governor Fubara, emphasizing the need for political stability in Rivers State. He noted that continuous political interference only serves to weaken governance and disrupt developmental projects. Way Forward for Rivers State Despite the controversy surrounding Tinubu’s directive, Governor Fubara is exploring ways to implement the president’s orders while maintaining his political standing. His recent attempt to present the 2025 budget to the House of Assembly faced resistance, highlighting the ongoing power struggle between the governor and the lawmakers allied with Wike. As the situation unfolds, stakeholders continue to debate the best approach to restoring peace in Rivers State. Many believe that true reconciliation can only be achieved if all parties involved—Governor Fubara, Wike, and the defected lawmakers—engage in open and honest dialogue without external influences. For further analysis on the evolving political crisis in Rivers State, visit Premium Times for reputable insights on Nigerian politics. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Tinubu’s State of Emergency in Rivers State Condemned by APC Stalwart A leading chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Chief Eze Chukwuemeka Eze, has strongly criticized President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s decision to impose a state of emergency in Rivers State. He labeled the move as an unconstitutional power grab and an attack on democracy, particularly targeting Governor Siminalayi Fubara. Emergency Declaration Sparks Political Uproar In a statement released in Port Harcourt, Chief Eze accused Tinubu of political bias. He questioned why the President suspended Governor Fubara, his deputy, and the State House of Assembly members while leaving out Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, whom he described as the mastermind of the crisis. Eze referenced Section 305 of the Nigerian Constitution, emphasizing that it does not empower the President to remove an elected governor. “There is no provision in Section 305 of the Nigerian Constitution that allows the suspension or removal of a democratically elected Governor. This action sets a dangerous precedent,” Eze stated. He also recalled that former President Goodluck Jonathan, during the 2013 state of emergency in Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa States, did not remove the sitting governors, as such a step would have been unconstitutional. Oil Revenue vs. National Security: A Political Agenda? The APC chieftain accused Tinubu of prioritizing oil interests over national security, noting that despite ongoing violence from terrorist attacks and herdsmen invasions, no state of emergency had been declared in other crisis-ridden states. “Since Tinubu took office in 2023, thousands of Nigerians have been killed due to insecurity, yet no state of emergency was declared. But at the mere threat to oil facilities, the President acted with unprecedented urgency.” Eze further alleged that Wike’s failure to impeach Governor Fubara using defected lawmakers prompted him to pressure the President into taking unconstitutional steps to remove the governor. Political Manipulation and the Future of Democracy Eze warned that Rivers people would resist any attempt to undermine their democratic rights, asserting that the state of emergency was a ploy to impose Wike’s political influence over the region. “The suspension of Fubara while Wike walks free is a direct attack on democracy. Rivers people will not allow their state to be hijacked by political interests.” Additionally, he reminded Tinubu of his opposition to former President Jonathan’s 2013 emergency rule, in which he labeled such decisions as dangerous governance trends. Calls for Resistance and Legislative Intervention Eze called on the National Assembly, state governors, and other democratic forces to reject the state of emergency, warning that allowing such unconstitutional actions to stand would weaken Nigeria’s democratic foundations. External Link: Read more on constitutional provisions regarding state of emergency declarations Conclusion The declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State has ignited a political firestorm, with Chief Eze leading the opposition against President Tinubu’s controversial decision. As tensions rise, the coming days will determine whether democratic institutions will challenge this move or allow it to set a new precedent in Nigeria’s political landscape. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
