Rivers Political Crisis: National Assembly Was Consulted Before Tinubu’s Decision – House Spokesperson

National Assembly Was Briefed Before Rivers Crisis Declaration – Hon. Rotimi House of Representatives spokesperson, Hon. Akin Rotimi, has confirmed that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu duly consulted the National Assembly before announcing his decision regarding the political crisis in Rivers State. In an official statement released in Abuja on Tuesday, Rotimi emphasized that key leaders within the National Assembly, including Senate President Senator Godswill Akpabio, Speaker of the House Hon. Abbas Tajudeen, Deputy Speaker Hon. Benjamin Kalu, Senate Leader Senator Michael Bamidele, and House Leader Rep. Prof. Julius Ihonvbere, were involved in deliberations with the President and National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, ahead of the official broadcast. High-Level Security Briefing and Legislative Support Rotimi detailed the sequence of events leading to the president’s declaration, stating that the meeting also included top security officials such as: “All attendees at the meeting were fully informed of the President’s decision, and there was unanimous agreement on the necessity of the action,” Rotimi stated. Legislative Process and Next Steps Further explaining the legislative process, Rotimi confirmed that President Tinubu had sent a formal letter to the House of Representatives, seeking approval in line with Section 305 of the Nigerian Constitution. “The letter will be presented during plenary on Wednesday, March 19, 2025, and lawmakers will deliberate on the matter before deciding on the next legislative course of action,” he added. External Perspective on the Rivers Crisis The decision to declare a state of emergency in Rivers State has sparked nationwide debate. Some analysts argue that while constitutional provisions were followed, the situation might have been politically motivated. Read expert analysis on the implications of this decision. Conclusion With the National Assembly’s involvement in the consultation process, President Tinubu’s decision appears to have legislative backing. However, how lawmakers respond during the plenary session remains a key development to watch. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel

Tinubu’s Decision to Sack Fubara While Retaining Wike Shocks Rivers State Government

The Rivers State Government has expressed deep shock over President Bola Tinubu’s decision to remove Governor Siminalayi Fubara while allowing the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, to remain in office despite accusations of fueling the state’s political crisis. Unfair Dismissal of Governor Fubara In a statement released by the Rivers State Commissioner for Information and Communications, Warisenibo Joe Johnson, the government strongly condemned the decision, describing it as unjust. Johnson highlighted that Governor Fubara has consistently upheld constitutional order, peace, and good governance despite ongoing political instability. Since assuming office, Fubara has prioritized the safety of lives and property while fostering the progress of Rivers State. Even amidst political turmoil, he has remained committed to his constitutional duties, placing the interests of the people above personal or political considerations. Compliance with Peace Agreement and Court Rulings Following President Tinubu’s intervention to resolve the crisis, the Rivers State Government demonstrated good faith by implementing the agreed terms, including reinstating commissioners who had previously resigned. Additionally, the government promptly adhered to the Supreme Court ruling upon receiving the certified true copy of the judgment, further reinforcing its commitment to the rule of law and democratic governance. Lawmakers Aligned with Wike Undermining Peace Despite these efforts, lawmakers loyal to Wike—who previously served as Rivers State Governor—have continued to disrupt stability and hinder peace. Johnson expressed disbelief that while Fubara was removed, Wike, the alleged mastermind behind the crisis, was left untouched. “It is shocking that Mr. President dismissed the governor while allowing his minister, who is the principal actor, to remain in office,” Johnson stated. Governance Continues Amidst Political Challenges The commissioner reassured the people of Rivers State that the government remains fully functional despite political challenges. Salaries continue to be paid, developmental projects are progressing, and the security of the state remains intact. At this crucial moment, the Rivers State Government has called on citizens to remain peaceful and law-abiding while reaffirming its commitment to working with all relevant institutions to uphold democracy and ensure continued progress. “We have always been a resilient people, and we will navigate this situation with wisdom, patience, and unwavering faith in the democratic process,” Johnson added. Commitment to Rivers State’s Progress The Rivers State Government maintains its dedication to prioritizing the welfare and prosperity of its citizens despite the ongoing political turbulence. For more context on Nigeria’s political landscape, visit Premium Times. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel

Rivers Political Crisis: Tinubu’s Directive Deepens South-South Divide

Tinubu’s Directive on Rivers Crisis Sparks Division in South-South Region The political crisis in Rivers State has intensified following President Bola Tinubu’s directive to leaders of the Pan Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF). During a meeting at the Presidential Villa in Abuja, Tinubu instructed PANDEF representatives to advise Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, to adhere to the Supreme Court ruling and promote peace amid the ongoing conflict with the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike. The PANDEF delegation, led by former military governor King Alfred Diete-Spiff and ex-Akwa Ibom Governor Obong Victor Attah, sought the president’s intervention to prevent the dispute from escalating. However, Tinubu’s response has led to widespread criticism, with stakeholders questioning the fairness of his stance. Controversy Over Presidential Intervention Tinubu’s Approach Favors Wike – INC President Prof. Okaba Professor Benjamin Okaba, President of the Ijaw National Congress (INC), criticized Tinubu’s handling of the situation, alleging that his directive emboldened Wike while undermining Fubara’s authority. Okaba remarked that PANDEF members felt humiliated by the president’s remarks and questioned whether his directive was a genuine attempt to restore peace or a strategic move to empower Wike. He further asserted that sustainable peace in Rivers State requires a balanced approach and urged Tinubu to ensure justice and fairness. Okaba warned that the Ijaw community would not tolerate any actions that undermine Fubara’s administration. Legal Perspective: Nwoko (SAN) Declares Tinubu’s Advice Unnecessary Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and former Akwa Ibom Attorney-General, Uwemedimo Nwoko, noted that Fubara was already complying with the Supreme Court ruling, making Tinubu’s directive redundant. He argued that the president should have also addressed the role of the 27 lawmakers aligned with Wike, who continue to challenge Fubara’s authority. Former Deputy Governor Ekpenyong: “Private Interests Overriding Public Good” Senator Chris Ekpenyong, ex-deputy governor of Akwa Ibom, expressed concern over the prioritization of personal political interests over the well-being of Rivers residents. He questioned why the Supreme Court’s ruling did not consider the lawmakers’ defection from PDP to APC and called for an end to political maneuvering that disrupts governance. PANDEF’s Credibility in Mediation Questioned Niger Delta activist Zik Gbemre criticized PANDEF’s ability to mediate the crisis, arguing that the group is too Ijaw-dominated to serve as a neutral arbiter. He suggested that Wike’s supporters are unlikely to trust PANDEF’s intervention, given its perceived alignment with Fubara. Gbemre further highlighted that past mediation efforts led by PANDEF, including those initiated by the late Edwin Clark, lacked neutrality and fairness. He proposed that an independent body should oversee the resolution process. Political Implications and Future Prospects President Tinubu’s intervention has inadvertently deepened the crisis rather than resolving it. Observers note that Fubara’s failed attempt to present the 2025 budget underscores the tense political climate in Rivers State. Moving forward, experts emphasize the need for an unbiased reconciliation process to restore stability. The Need for a Way Forward It is crucial to find a path forward. Governor Sim Fubara’s actions stem from his deep concern for the people of Rivers State. If he were merely a transactional leader, he could have struck a deal that would ultimately harm the state. However, he has chosen to prioritize the welfare of the people, ensuring that the state’s resources are used for their benefit rather than for political bargains. This stance is at the root of the ongoing impasse. That said, legislators represent various constituencies, and it is the responsibility of the elders, leaders of the Niger Delta, and the people of Rivers State to advise and guide those they have elected to serve their interests. Strategic Engagement is Key — Ambakederimo, South-South Leader Joseph Ambakederimo, Convener of the South-South Reawakening Group, emphasized the importance of dialogue and adherence to due process in resolving political disputes. He warned that, even as the governor has committed to fully implementing the Supreme Court’s ruling, caution must be exercised. While the governor’s decision is commendable, he must carefully choose his words and focus on strategic engagement rather than escalating tensions. The primary concern should be the well-being of Rivers residents, not engaging with elements that seek to incite conflict. A middle ground solution is possible, and all parties should embrace it in the best interest of the state. Ultimately, common sense must prevail, and the rule of law must be upheld. Judiciary Under Scrutiny — Akene, Development Consultant Development consultant Furoebi Akene criticized President Tinubu’s confidence in the judiciary, suggesting it could be a veiled attempt to influence legal proceedings. He pointed out the irregularities in past Supreme Court decisions, where a five-member panel overturned a verdict previously given by a seven-member panel on the same issue. Akene argued that such inconsistencies undermine the legal system, making it appear that constitutional principles no longer hold weight. While peace missions are commendable, he cautioned against jeopardizing reputations in the process. According to him, if any integrity remains within the judiciary, it is already severely compromised. A Balanced Resolution — Morris, Former CLO Chair, Bayelsa Former Civil Liberties Organisation chairman in Bayelsa State, Alagoa Morris, expressed his dissatisfaction with the current state of democracy in Nigeria. While acknowledging the political nature of governance, he lamented the undue influence on the judiciary, which has contributed to the nation’s challenges. In his view, the best solution for Rivers State would be a no-winner, no-loser scenario, where Governor Fubara completes his four-year term while the legislators retain their positions. However, he noted that those benefiting from judicial rulings may seek absolute control, making it difficult to find common ground, much like Shylock demanding his pound of flesh. Seeking a Political Solution — Adima, Political Activist Delta State political activist Blessing Adima stressed the need for dialogue with both the governor and the 27 legislators. He urged stakeholders to appeal to the lawmakers to reason with Governor Fubara and work towards unity, rather than fueling political discord. A collective resolution is essential to prevent internal destruction, as a political settlement is the only viable path forward. Presidential Intervention