Former Kano State Governor and prominent Nigerian politician, Rabiu Kwankwaso, has revealed that neither he nor his political supporters received recognition after contributing nearly two million votes to help the late former President Muhammadu Buhari during previous elections. Speaking during an interview on Arise Television Prime Time on Monday night, Kwankwaso explained that the sacrifices made by his political structure and loyalists were never acknowledged despite the risks they took during the election period. According to the chieftain of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), the experience became one of the reasons he started pushing for political transformation and reforms across the country. Kwankwaso stated that he and his political movement delivered approximately 1.9 million votes to Buhari’s camp during the election. However, he expressed disappointment that there was no appreciation or meaningful reward for the effort and dedication shown by his supporters. He explained that many members of his political base worked tirelessly and even exposed themselves to danger while mobilizing support at the grassroots level. Despite their commitment, he claimed that neither the individuals involved nor the communities they represented benefited from their contributions afterward. The former presidential candidate further stressed that many Nigerians are currently dissatisfied with the direction of the country under the administration of President Bola Tinubu. Kwankwaso noted that economic hardship, governance concerns, and public dissatisfaction have continued to increase calls for political adjustments and reforms across different levels of society. Speaking during the television interview, he said: “I worked extremely hard. We delivered about 1.9 million, nearly two million votes. But as politicians, we were not recognized. We even put our lives on the line during that period. “Sadly, we did not witness any meaningful benefit either personally or for the constituencies we represented.” He also maintained that challenges facing the current administration have strengthened the desire for change among ordinary Nigerians and political stakeholders alike. Kwankwaso added that many citizens at the grassroots level now believe the country requires a new direction capable of addressing pressing national issues and improving governance. The remarks have generated conversations across Nigeria’s political space, especially among supporters and observers monitoring developments ahead of future political realignments and elections. Political analysts believe statements like these may influence ongoing discussions about coalition-building, opposition movements, and electoral strategies in Nigeria. For more political news and updates, visit LMSINT MEDIA.
Why BVAS Faces Challenges in Nigeria Compared to Ghana: Key Lessons for Credible Elections The inability of Nigeria’s Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deliver credible elections has raised concerns, particularly when compared to Ghana’s success with the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS). Despite advancements in election technology, including the introduction of BVAS, Nigeria continues to face significant challenges, as evidenced by the public outcry following the 2019 and 2023 elections. Meanwhile, Ghana’s smooth presidential election processes—marked by transparency and integrity—underscore the stark differences in electoral outcomes between the two nations. Below are seven critical reasons BVAS thrives in Ghana but faces significant obstacles in Nigeria. 1. Integrity of Electoral Leadership Ghana: Electoral officials in Ghana prioritize transparency and fairness. The leadership ensures that elections are credible, fostering public trust. For example, the leadership of Madam Jean Mensa has upheld the country’s election credibility. Nigeria: The human factor undermines Nigeria’s BVAS operations. Accusations of bias, corruption, and complicity plague INEC, eroding public confidence in the system. 2. Non-Partisan Appointments Ghana: Electoral officers in Ghana are appointed based on merit and neutrality, reducing political interference. Nigeria: Conversely, political affiliations often influence appointments in Nigeria. Some INEC officials have ties to political elites, creating opportunities for intentional sabotage of BVAS. 3. Accountability and Penalties Ghana: Electoral malpractice attracts severe penalties in Ghana, deterring unethical behavior. Special courts ensure that justice is swift. Nigeria: Accountability is weak in Nigeria. Electoral malpractices often go unpunished, emboldening those who undermine the system. This lack of consequences fuels distrust in the process. 4. Retention of Proven Leaders Ghana: Continuity in leadership ensures institutional memory. Leaders like Dr. Kwadwo Afari-Gyan transformed Ghana’s electoral system through decades of credible service. Nigeria: Proven leaders in Nigeria are often replaced or sidelined, disrupting institutional growth. This lack of continuity hampers electoral integrity. 5. Technical Training and Implementation Ghana: Well-trained staff ensure smooth BVAS implementation. Rigorous training equips electoral officials to address technical challenges. Nigeria: Training for electoral staff is often inadequate, with allegations of deliberate sabotage during critical moments, such as server failures during elections. This undermines BVAS functionality. 6. Political Will and Stakeholder Commitment Ghana: Political actors in Ghana demonstrate genuine commitment to free and fair elections, ensuring BVAS operates effectively. Nigeria: Political interference in Nigeria undermines BVAS. Stakeholders often manipulate the system to achieve favorable outcomes, further eroding public trust. 7. Adherence to Constitutional Provisions Ghana: Leaders respect constitutional guidelines in appointing electoral officials, ensuring credibility. Nigeria: In Nigeria, constitutional provisions for appointments are often ignored, leading to partisan selections that compromise the integrity of elections. Declining Voter Turnout in Nigeria Voter turnout in Nigeria has been steadily declining, from 69.1% in 2003 to just 26.7% in 2023. This trend reflects growing apathy fueled by distrust in INEC, logistical challenges, and fears of election-day violence. Recommendations for Nigeria To ensure BVAS functions effectively in future elections, Nigeria must adopt the following measures: Conclusion Ghana’s success with BVAS highlights the importance of integrity, accountability, and commitment in electoral processes. For Nigeria to restore public trust, significant reforms must address the human factors undermining BVAS. The 2027 elections will be a litmus test for Nigeria’s commitment to credible and transparent elections. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Chanel.
