The Northern Youth Council of Nigeria (NYCN) has issued a strong call to suspended Kogi Central Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, urging her to present credible proof supporting her claims of sexual harassment and an assassination plot allegedly orchestrated by Senate President Godswill Akpabio. Isah Abubakar, who serves as the NYCN’s National President, made this demand as Akpoti-Uduaghan appears at the Federal Capital Territory High Court, Maitama, where she is currently undergoing trial for alleged defamation. These defamation charges were reportedly brought forward by the Federal Government, following a formal complaint filed by Senate President Akpabio. The youth group has also called upon Nigerian security agencies to take proactive steps in probing the senator’s claims. Speaking to members of the press in Abuja, Abubakar emphasized the importance of evidence when such sensitive allegations are made. “It’s unacceptable for anyone to casually throw around allegations like sexual harassment without substantiating them with evidence,” he stated. “As men, we understand the severe implications such accusations carry.” Commenting on the allegations of sexual harassment made against Akpabio, Abubakar added: “We respectfully urge Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan to back her claims with credible evidence. Such serious allegations demand a strong commitment to truth and justice, and we acknowledge the sensitivity involved.” He further warned against making unverified claims that could cause reputational harm and incite mistrust among Nigeria’s political stakeholders. Referencing a political gathering that took place on April 1, Abubakar noted that Senator Akpoti had claimed there was a conversation indicating a threat to her life involving Akpabio and other unnamed individuals. He said the gravity of the accusation warrants a full investigation by all appropriate law enforcement bodies. “We urge Akpoti to present the public with factual evidence as her court proceedings continue,” he said. “Transparency is crucial — the public deserves to understand the full context of these allegations to make informed judgments.” He concluded by stating, “Allegations should not be based on personal bias or for popularity. If someone alleges an assassination attempt, they must show reliable and verifiable proof.” “No one should make baseless claims that could tarnish the image of individuals or indict innocent persons unfairly,” Abubakar stressed.
Senators Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and Sunday Karimi Clash Over Suspension Controversy Suspended Kogi Central Senator, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, and Kogi West Senator, Sunday Karimi, engaged in a heated war of words over her recent suspension from the Nigerian Senate. The dispute escalated as Karimi defended the decision, arguing that her conduct in the Senate justified the disciplinary action. Karimi, a member of the All Progressives Congress (APC), insisted that Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension was necessary due to the controversy surrounding her actions, which he claimed had embarrassed Kogi State. He further suggested that former Governor Yahaya Bello had foreseen this issue, reinforcing concerns about her suitability for the Red Chamber. “All our advice to her fell on deaf ears. One cannot ignore the fact that Yahaya Bello saw this coming,” Karimi stated while addressing journalists. The senator further alleged that Akpoti-Uduaghan had tarnished Kogi State’s reputation and that her actions had contributed to a negative perception of the state across the country. Akpoti-Uduaghan Fires Back, Calls for Senate Drug Tests Reacting to Karimi’s remarks, Akpoti-Uduaghan dismissed his claims, stating that personal interests were influencing Senate decisions. She went further to propose periodic drug testing for senators, arguing that such measures would enhance rational decision-making within the legislature. “The NDLEA needs to conduct periodic tests on senators. That singular process will save the parliament from erratic legislative hallucinations,” she remarked through her media aide, Israel Arogbonlo. Akpoti-Uduaghan referenced previous calls by NDLEA Chairman, Brig. Gen. Buba Marwa, for political aspirants to undergo drug screenings, emphasizing that similar tests had already been conducted for local government candidates in Kano State. She asserted that extending this policy to senators would help safeguard the integrity of legislative proceedings and ensure effective governance. Political Fallout and Implications The suspension of Akpoti-Uduaghan followed a confrontation with Senate President Godswill Akpabio, an incident that has ignited political tensions in Kogi State and beyond. The controversy has further deepened divisions within the Senate, with some lawmakers supporting disciplinary measures while others call for a review of the decision. For a broader perspective on Nigeria’s legislative reforms and governance integrity, read this analysis on legislative accountability by a leading political affairs expert. Conclusion The Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan suspension controversy underscores the ongoing political power struggle within the Nigerian Senate. While Karimi defends the disciplinary action as a necessary move to uphold legislative standards, Akpoti-Uduaghan insists that Senate reforms—including mandatory drug testing—are crucial for maintaining integrity in governance. As debates over the incident continue, Nigerians closely watch how this clash will shape the political landscape and the future of legislative conduct in the country. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
A Federal High Court in Lokoja, Kogi State, has lifted its previous injunction that temporarily halted the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from processing a recall petition against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan. This decision clears the way for the recall procedure to move forward. Legal Green Light for Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Recall Process In a pivotal ruling delivered on Friday, the court affirmed that the recall process initiated by Kogi Central Senatorial District constituents is constitutionally legitimate. The judgment emphasizes that voters have the right to seek the recall of their elected representatives as part of their civic duties. The court further advised that all activities related to the recall be conducted in a peaceful and lawful manner. This ruling follows a temporary order issued on Thursday, which had restrained INEC from accepting or acting on the recall petition. The initial injunction also prohibited the commission from conducting any referendum concerning the petition until a related motion was resolved. Controversy Over Alleged Fictitious Signatures The restraining order had been granted in response to an ex-parte application filed by five registered voters from Kogi Central, led by Anebe Jacob Ogirima. Their legal representative, Smart Nwachimere, argued that the recall petition contained questionable signatures, which cast doubt on its legitimacy. Despite lifting the restriction, the court upheld its position against fraudulent activities. It explicitly warned INEC not to proceed with any recall petitions found to contain fake or manipulated signatures. The case is scheduled for further hearings on May 6, 2025. Conclusion With the court’s latest ruling, the recall process is set to advance unless further legal actions arise. This decision reaffirms the importance of electoral accountability and the constitutional rights of voters. Read More on Electoral Procedures READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
ABUJA – Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio, has criticized Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan (PDP, Kogi Central), stating that her actions may negatively impact the inclusion of women in high-ranking political positions in Nigeria. During a plenary session on Tuesday, Akpabio expressed concerns that Akpoti-Uduaghan’s approach to her allegations against him could have far-reaching consequences for women seeking leadership roles in governance. “When this matter began, she initially submitted it as a petition to the Senate but did not allow deliberation before taking it to court. Even then, she escalated it to the international stage before the judiciary could resolve it,” Akpabio stated. Drawing a comparison, he said it would be similar to U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris accusing President Joe Biden of misconduct over a mere handshake, potentially setting a precedent discouraging female appointments. Despite his concerns, Akpabio urged politicians not to let one individual’s actions affect opportunities for others, emphasizing his commitment to ensuring a fair playing field for women, including his four daughters. Senate Passes Vote of Confidence in Akpabio Following Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension for misconduct and her sexual harassment allegations against Akpabio, the Senate unanimously passed a vote of confidence in his leadership on Tuesday. The motion was raised by Senate Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele (APC, Ekiti Central) under Senate Rules Orders 40 and 51. Bamidele dismissed claims that the Senate ignored sexual harassment allegations, clarifying that no formal report was submitted between August 2023 and now. The Ethics and Privileges Committee had only reviewed a petition regarding Akpoti-Uduaghan’s breach of Senate regulations. Akpabio Criticizes Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Appeal to International Bodies Akpabio also criticized Akpoti-Uduaghan for externalizing the issue by presenting her case to the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) in New York, where she alleged that her suspension was retaliation for speaking against sexual harassment. “She left the chamber and went on Brekete Radio and Arise Television to misrepresent the situation. She has now taken it to the IPU UN event, trying to embarrass Nigeria with a misleading narrative.” Akpabio commended Rt. Hon. Kafilat Okpara for countering Akpoti-Uduaghan’s claims at the international event, ensuring that Nigeria’s image was not tarnished. Senate Leader: Allegations Are a Diversion Senate Leader Bamidele clarified that the Senate’s actions were based on legislative rules, not external pressures. He refuted allegations that Akpabio presided over his own case, stating that the proceedings strictly focused on disciplinary measures for rule violations. “Some claim the Senate has no right to suspend a senator. That is a legal matter for the courts. However, our rules are clear on disciplinary actions.” Deputy Minority Leader, Senator Olalere Oyewumi (PDP, Osun West), seconded the motion, and the Senate unanimously adopted it. Senate Focuses on Governance After Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Suspension Deputy Senate President, Senator Barau Jibrin (APC, Kano North), called on lawmakers to redirect their focus toward governance and the 2025 budget implementation, now that the issue is before the court. The Senate’s resolutions on Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension include: However, following a motion by Senator Orji Uzor Kalu (APC, Abia North), seconded by Senator Ned Nwoko (APC, Delta North), it was decided that her legislative aides would continue receiving their salaries. Despite her suspension, Akpoti-Uduaghan has taken her case to the United Nations Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), arguing that her suspension was unjustified. For a deeper insight into legislative processes, visit the Nigerian Senate’s Official Website. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel Kindly Share:
Kindly Share:
The Nigerian Senate has debunked widespread claims that Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central, was suspended due to allegations of sexual harassment against Senate President Godswill Akpabio. Instead, the legislative body clarified that her suspension resulted from repeated violations of Senate Standing Orders 2023 (As Amended) and a pattern of unparliamentary behavior. Why Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Was Suspended According to Senate Leader Senator Opeyemi Bamidele, Akpoti-Uduaghan was sanctioned for disregarding Sections 6.1 and 6.2 of the Senate’s procedural rules. In a statement released on Saturday, Bamidele refuted media reports insinuating that her suspension stemmed from accusations against Akpabio, labeling such claims as misleading and deliberately deceptive. Following the recommendations of its Committee on Ethics and Privileges, the Senate imposed a six-month suspension on Akpoti-Uduaghan, citing misconduct and her refusal to adhere to assigned seating arrangements during plenary sessions. However, the chamber provided an opportunity for reconsideration, stating that if Akpoti-Uduaghan submits a formal apology, the leadership may lift the suspension before the six-month period elapses. Instead of adhering to Senate protocols, Akpoti-Uduaghan allegedly misled the public by claiming she was targeted for her sexual harassment allegations. Bamidele emphasized that disciplinary action against the senator was solely based on her conduct and non-compliance with established legislative rules. Procedural Flaws in Sexual Harassment Petition Bamidele further disclosed that Akpoti-Uduaghan’s petition on sexual harassment failed to meet the Senate’s procedural requirements for submitting complaints. He reiterated that if she had followed due process, the petition would have been assessed on merit. “The Senate has noted various misleading media reports falsely linking Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension to allegations of sexual harassment. This narrative is entirely incorrect. The senator’s failure to adhere to Senate guidelines led to disciplinary action,” the statement read. The Ethics and Privileges Committee found Akpoti-Uduaghan guilty of breaching Senate Standing Orders, leading to her suspension. The violations cited in the report include: Public Trust and Democratic Implications The Advocacy for Integrity and Rule of Law (AIRL), a civic rights organization, has warned that the Senate’s handling of Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension could erode public trust and jeopardize democratic values. AIRL Chairman, Mohammed Ibrahim Gamawa, stressed the need for legislative restraint, warning that denying Akpoti-Uduaghan’s constituency representation could damage the Senate’s reputation. The group described the ongoing Senate dispute as a “show of shame” that could undermine Nigeria’s democratic institutions. AIRL urged the 10th Senate to prioritize national interest and resolve the conflict through dialogue to prevent long-term political instability. Conclusion As tensions persist, stakeholders continue to call for transparency in governance. The Senate’s actions and responses will determine whether this controversy fades or escalates into a larger political crisis. To maintain institutional credibility, political leaders must act in accordance with democratic principles and constitutional provisions. Premium Times READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Emerging details indicate deep divisions within the Nigerian Senate regarding the recent suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan (PDP, Kogi Central) for six months. Controversy Over Senate Ethics Committee’s Decision Concerns have been raised about the swift actions taken by the Senate Committee on Ethics, Code of Conduct, and Public Petitions, chaired by Senator Neda Imaseun (LP, Edo South), in processing the disciplinary case against Akpoti-Uduaghan. Several senators, including senior members, were unavailable due to a tax reform retreat organized by the Senate Committee on Finance. Despite this, the hearing was unexpectedly expedited, raising suspicions about the motive behind the process. A high-ranking senator, who chose to remain anonymous, revealed that the initial date for the hearing was Tuesday, March 11. However, it was abruptly rescheduled, leaving many lawmakers questioning the urgency. He noted, “This process was unnecessarily rushed. Why the urgency? Why couldn’t the committee wait for full participation? The absence of senior Senators during the proceedings suggests the outcome was predetermined.” Additionally, the senator criticized the committee for proceeding despite a court injunction that had temporarily halted the investigation. “As lawmakers, we must adhere to due process. This was why 13 of us refused to sign the report,” he explained. Details of Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Suspension On Thursday, the Senate imposed a six-month suspension on Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan for allegedly violating the Senate Standing Rules 2023 (as amended). The disciplinary action followed her protest over the reassignment of her seat by Senate President Godswill Akpabio on February 20. The Senate justified the suspension by claiming she had brought the presiding officer and the chamber into disrepute. As part of the suspension terms: Initially, the committee’s report recommended that salaries for her legislative aides be halted as well. However, a motion introduced by former Chief Whip Senator Orji Uzor Kalu (APC, Abia North) and supported by Senator Ned Nwoko (APC, Delta North) ensured that her aides would continue receiving their payments. Senate Minority Leader Senator Abba Moro (PDP, Benue South) had appealed for a reduction of the suspension period to three months, but his plea was rejected by the chamber. Background of the Suspension The suspension stemmed from a heated exchange during a Senate plenary session after Akpoti-Uduaghan discovered that her seat had been reassigned, and her nameplate removed. This led to a tense standoff as she demanded an explanation from Senate leadership. The Senate has indicated that it may reconsider her suspension if she formally submits a written apology. External Insights and Public Reactions This suspension has sparked widespread debate regarding legislative due process and internal political dynamics. According to a report by Premium Times, political analysts argue that the situation exposes underlying rifts within the Senate and raises concerns about fairness in handling disciplinary measures against lawmakers. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Legal experts have strongly criticized the Nigerian Senate’s six-month suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan (PDP, Kogi Central), calling it unconstitutional and a violation of her fundamental rights. According to prominent lawyers, the Senate’s action disregarded a valid court injunction and could set a dangerous precedent for legislative overreach in Nigeria. Court Order Ignored in Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Suspension The Senate announced Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension on Thursday, just a day after Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court in Abuja issued an order preventing the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Code of Conduct from investigating her over alleged misconduct. The court had mandated the Senate to justify its inquiry within 72 hours, yet the legislative body proceeded with the suspension in defiance of the ruling. Legal Experts Condemn Senate’s Action A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Kunle Edun, described the suspension as a blatant breach of legal principles. He emphasized that Senate Rule 67(4) only permits suspensions for a maximum of 14 days, making Akpoti-Uduaghan’s six-month suspension unconstitutional. “I strongly oppose the suspension of Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan. The Senate, which should uphold the law, has instead violated it. Moreover, since the issue is before the court, it is sub judice. The Senate’s Ethics Committee cannot admit this fact on one hand and contradict itself by suspending her,” Edun stated. He further criticized the Senate’s disregard for the principle of separation of powers, explaining that ignoring a court order is an unlawful act. “Any disagreement with the court’s decision should have been legally challenged rather than outrightly disobeyed. The legislature cannot place itself above the judiciary.” Violation of Democratic Principles Prominent lawyer and activist Deji Adeyanju also condemned the Senate’s actions, arguing that the suspension was not just illegal but also an attempt to silence Akpoti-Uduaghan amid her petition against Senate President Godswill Akpabio over allegations of sexual harassment. “I find the suspension deeply troubling. It is a clear violation of democratic values and fundamental human rights,” Adeyanju stated. He further expressed concerns over the Ethics Committee’s neutrality, pointing out that its chairman had previously defended Akpabio, creating a conflict of interest. “It is unacceptable that neither Akpoti-Uduaghan nor Akpabio was invited for proper questioning. The lack of due process in this matter reflects the same flaws we see in Nigeria’s electoral system,” he added. Background of the Controversy The tension between Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Senate leadership escalated on February 20, 2025, when she protested the reassignment of her Senate seat by Akpabio. Following this, the matter was referred to the Ethics Committee, but Akpoti-Uduaghan declined to appear, citing the court order preventing any probe. Her suspension also followed her renewed efforts to present a sexual harassment petition against Akpabio, which had initially been blocked but was later referred to the Ethics Committee for consideration. Akpoti-Uduaghan Responds to Suspension Reacting to the development, Akpoti-Uduaghan denounced the Senate’s action as unfair and undemocratic. “In defiance of intimidation and the culture of silence, my unjust suspension violates natural justice and fairness. However, this illegal action does not revoke my legitimacy as a senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. I remain committed to serving my constituents and my country,” she affirmed. Conclusion The controversial suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan raises significant legal and democratic concerns. Experts argue that ignoring a court ruling undermines the rule of law, setting a troubling precedent. As the debate continues, Nigerians will be watching closely to see how this matter unfolds and whether the judiciary will assert its authority over legislative excesses. Constitutional Rights and Legislative Limits READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
The National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) has urged President Bola Tinubu and the leadership of the National Assembly to intervene in the escalating dispute between Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central. The student body warns that failure to address the issue could lead to international embarrassment for Nigeria. NANS Calls for Immediate Intervention In a statement issued in Abeokuta, Ogun State, and signed by NANS National Vice President Akinbodunse Sileola Felicia, the association emphasized the importance of resolving the tension between both senators before it spirals out of control. The conflict emerged during a Senate plenary session when Akpoti-Uduaghan and Akpabio clashed over seating arrangements. The situation escalated when Akpoti-Uduaghan later accused the Senate President of sexual harassment. Peace Advocacy Amidst Growing Tensions Akinbodunse appealed for calm, urging both lawmakers to set aside their differences in the interest of national stability. She stressed that the National Assembly is a critical governmental institution that should be composed of responsible and ethical representatives. She further highlighted that if the allegations of sexual harassment leveled against Akpabio are not properly handled, they could tarnish Nigeria’s international reputation. The Need for a Thorough Investigation While acknowledging that Akpoti-Uduaghan has yet to provide substantial evidence to support her claims, the NANS vice president advised the Senate leadership to investigate the allegations thoroughly. She emphasized that the legislative chambers should focus on pressing national issues rather than internal disputes, especially during this period of economic challenges. Call for Reconciliation and National Interest Akinbodunse urged Senate President Akpabio to demonstrate leadership by extending an olive branch to Akpoti-Uduaghan. Likewise, she encouraged the female senator to prioritize peace and national interest over personal grievances. Students Ready to Take Action NANS has vowed to monitor the situation closely and has warned that if the dispute is not amicably settled, students across Nigeria may be compelled to stage a protest at the National Assembly. Read more about Nigeria’s legislative processes READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
