Political analyst and policy strategist, Baba Yusuf, has shared his thoughts on the possible chances of a joint presidential ticket involving Peter Obi and Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso ahead of the 2027 presidential election in Nigeria. Speaking during an interview on Arise Television’s Prime Time programme on Friday, Yusuf explained that although both politicians may attract millions of supporters nationwide, the alliance could still face constitutional and political challenges required to win a presidential election in Nigeria. According to him, electoral victory in Nigeria is not only about securing a large number of votes. He stressed that candidates must also achieve the required geographical spread across different regions of the country, particularly the North and the South, to satisfy constitutional provisions. His comments followed the recent political development involving Obi and Kwankwaso, who reportedly exited the African Democratic Congress, ADC, and aligned with the Nigerian Democratic Congress, NDC. Reports indicated that internal party disagreements and legal disputes contributed to their departure from the ADC. While analysing the political landscape, Yusuf noted that both leaders still possess strong political influence and public support. He stated that a significant number of Nigerians who did not participate in the 2023 election may become active voters in 2027, which could increase the voting strength of emerging political alliances. However, he argued that popularity alone may not be enough to guarantee success at the presidential level. He explained that the Nigerian electoral system requires broader national acceptance and strategic alliances capable of producing balanced support across multiple states and regions. Yusuf further emphasised the importance of political consultations, coalition-building, and negotiations among opposition leaders. In his opinion, successful political movements are usually built through cooperation rather than individual ambition. He suggested that experienced political figures such as Atiku Abubakar could play a significant role in discussions surrounding power-sharing arrangements and opposition unity ahead of the 2027 election cycle. According to Yusuf, political leaders seeking to challenge established structures must focus on unity, compromise, and inclusive decision-making. He warned that any political movement driven by personal interest or a “stand-alone” mentality may struggle to achieve the level of national consensus needed to win a presidential contest in Nigeria. The discussion surrounding a possible Obi–Kwankwaso alliance has continued to generate reactions among political observers, supporters, and stakeholders across the country. Many analysts believe that coalition politics may become one of the defining factors leading into the 2027 general elections. Political observers also argue that voter mobilisation, youth participation, economic concerns, and regional balancing are likely to shape electoral outcomes in the coming years. With political realignments already taking place, attention remains focused on how opposition figures will position themselves ahead of the next presidential race. For now, debates about possible alliances, negotiations, and coalition strategies continue to dominate Nigeria’s political atmosphere as parties and political actors prepare for what could become one of the country’s most competitive elections in recent history.
For more than a year, Nigeria’s foremost opposition figures have consistently challenged the policies and leadership style of the All Progressives Congress (APC)-led government under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Their criticisms extend beyond economic hardship and inflation, as they also accuse the administration of systematically silencing dissent and steering the country toward a one-party state—something they consider a significant threat to democratic values. In response, opposition leaders pledged to set aside party loyalties and unite in a coalition to dethrone the APC in 2027, presenting themselves as the nation’s last hope to break free from economic hardship and political repression. Formation of the ADC-Led Coalition After months of intensive consultations and political deliberations, the coalition was officially unveiled on July 2, 2025, with the African Democratic Congress (ADC) adopted as the coalition’s official platform for the 2027 general elections. This strategic alliance attracted high-profile political heavyweights from across party lines—including the APC, PDP, LP, and NNPP. Prominent figures like former Vice President and PDP presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar, ex-Anambra Governor and LP flagbearer Peter Obi, NNPP’s Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, and ADC’s Ralphs Okey Nwosu championed this new movement. Joining them were influential politicians like former Senate President David Mark, former Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi, ex-Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai, and former Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola. Notably, Nwosu and other ADC executives resigned their positions, clearing the path for Mark and Aregbesola to serve as interim national chairman and secretary, respectively. Their mission: Defeat Tinubu in 2027 and “liberate” Nigerians from APC rule. Revisiting 2015: A Rare Political Upset The 2015 general elections were historic. For the first time in Nigerian political history, an opposition party unseated the ruling party. The APC, formed from the merger of multiple opposition parties—ACN, CPC, ANPP, APGA factions, and DPP—successfully fielded retired General Muhammadu Buhari against then-incumbent President Goodluck Jonathan. Will history repeat itself in 2027? Disunity and Strategic Hurdles Facing the Coalition Despite forming the coalition, internal disunity among opposition parties remains a significant stumbling block. Unlike 2015, where political actors fully committed to APC, many present-day opposition members—including state and federal lawmakers—are yet to formalize their move to the coalition. For example, senators like Aminu Tambuwal, Enyinnaya Abaribe, Abdul Ningi, Austin Akobundu, and Ireti Kingibe appear aligned with the ADC but haven’t officially declared their defections. Even Peter Obi has not completely abandoned the Labour Party, prompting PDP stalwarts such as Prof Jerry Gana and Abduljabbar Rufai to encourage him to return to the PDP, believing his candidacy on that platform would resonate well, especially in Northern Nigeria. Obi, through Obidient Movement coordinator Dr. Yunusa Tanko, confirmed he’s open to coalition talks aimed at rescuing the nation. Resistance from PDP and SDP Two weeks before the ADC’s unveiling, the PDP and Social Democratic Party (SDP) criticized the new coalition, reiterating their opposition to any of their members defecting. The PDP vowed to penalize defectors while the SDP expelled El-Rufai for allegedly misusing the party’s identity in dealings with the ADC coalition. Who Will Get the ADC Presidential Ticket? One major unresolved issue is the flagbearer debate. Political insiders speculate a fallout could erupt among Atiku, Obi, Amaechi, and El-Rufai if the ticket does not favor one of them. However, the coalition leaders deny such fears, emphasizing that their focus is national rescue, not personal ambitions. Internal Party Crises Within the Opposition The PDP continues to grapple with the influence of FCT Minister and former Rivers Governor Nyesom Wike—who worked against PDP’s presidential candidate in 2023 and currently supports Tinubu’s second term. Several PDP members have defected to both APC and ADC, weakening the party further. The Labour Party (LP) is plagued by a three-headed leadership crisis: one faction under Julius Abure (recognized on INEC’s site), another led by Nenadi Usman (supported by Peter Obi, NLC, and TUC), and a third, shadowy group allegedly represented by Apapa and Abayomi Arabambi. Although the Supreme Court ruled on LP’s leadership dispute in April 2025, INEC has not issued a conclusive statement and has excluded Abure from post-ruling meetings. The ADC is not without its troubles either. Former deputy chairman Mr. Nafi’u Bala claimed he was now national chairman, alleging hijacking by outsiders. The leadership dismissed his claims and revealed his earlier resignation letter, accusing him of being part of a wider disruption plot. Alleged Harassment and Government Pushback Beyond internal wrangling, opposition parties face pressure from government institutions. LP’s Nenadi Usman-led faction recently decried security harassment of party leaders following a petition by Arabambi alleging a plot to use a protest march to reclaim LP’s secretariat. This, they argued, was a dangerous trend and urged security agencies to investigate those behind such destabilizing petitions. APC Accused of Weakening Democracy Former Sokoto Governor Attahiru Bafarawa recently published an open letter urging Tinubu not to suppress opposition voices. He warned that such actions undermine democratic institutions and reminded the president that he once benefitted from a robust opposition framework. Echoing similar concerns, ADC’s Ralphs Nwosu disclosed he rejected bribes and ministerial offers allegedly from APC agents aimed at dissolving the coalition movement. Nwosu claimed efforts to sabotage the ADC include legal actions by infiltrators allegedly planted by the ruling party. Presidency Refutes Bribery Allegation Presidency spokesperson Daniel Bwala dismissed Nwosu’s claims, stating that no one but the president could allocate ministerial positions, thereby questioning the credibility of Nwosu’s statements. Analyst Commentary: Faulty Strategy May Undermine Coalition Respected political analyst Dr. Olu Fasan described the coalition as strong on paper but weak in execution. According to him, the alliance lacks ideological unity, as its members have no real policy distinctions from the APC—they are merely united in their opposition to Tinubu’s style of leadership. Fasan emphasized that Tinubu governs with excessive centralization and arrogance, citing the naming of multiple national monuments after him within just two years in office. He added that if the coalition is serious about change, they should have established a new party, rather than “renting” the ADC. He further noted that unless
Kindly Share:
The Renewed Controversy Over PDP’s Running Mate Choice The debate over the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) running mate selection during the 2023 presidential election has resurfaced. A report recently brought to light suggests that the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, was initially favored over Ifeanyi Okowa, a claim that contradicts former PDP presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar’s previous statements. Leaked Report Reignites Political Tensions The controversy was reignited by Mr. Lere Olayinka, an aide to Nyesom Wike. The PDP committee’s report, signed by former National Chairman Iyorchia Ayu and other key leaders, was dated June 14, 2022, and reportedly sighted by LMSINT MEDIA. The report, titled “Report of the Advisory Committee for the Selection of Presidential Running Mate,” indicated the following preference order: The committee’s decision was based on the broader interests of the party. The report was signed by notable PDP figures, including Umar I. Damagun, Aminu Waziri Tambuwal, Bala Mohammed, Olusegun Mimiko, and David Mark. Atiku’s Claim vs. Wike’s Camp Response Atiku Abubakar, in an interview with Adesuwa Giwa-Osagie, claimed that the committee ranked Okowa as the top choice, with Wike coming second and Udom Emmanuel third. He defended his decision to pick Okowa based on the committee’s recommendation. However, Wike’s Senior Special Assistant on Public Communications and Social Media, Lere Olayinka, accused Atiku of distorting facts. He urged the former Vice President to seek forgiveness, stating: “Someone needs to show this to Atiku so that he can seek forgiveness before Ramadan ends.” Olayinka further alleged that Atiku misrepresented the committee’s findings to justify his choice of Okowa. Atiku’s Camp Responds to Allegations Atiku’s media team dismissed Olayinka’s statements as an “emotional outburst” and reaffirmed that Okowa’s selection was based on intellect, composure, and statesmanship rather than party politics. In a statement, Atiku’s media office emphasized: “While we understand that bitterness often finds expression in misplaced aggression, we must remind Wike and his team that a bitter heart isn’t capable of charity, nor does it inspire unity, healing, or truth.” They reiterated that Atiku had no apologies for choosing Okowa over Wike, as the decision aligned with his vision for national leadership. Internal Party Division and Political Fallout The renewed controversy reflects the ongoing internal tensions within the PDP. While Wike’s faction insists on the validity of the leaked committee report, Atiku’s supporters maintain that his choice was the right decision for the party and the nation. This division highlights broader challenges within the PDP as it seeks to rebuild its political strategy ahead of future elections. Conclusion The verbal war between Atiku and Wike’s camps over Okowa’s selection as PDP’s running mate in 2023 underscores lingering political rivalries. As the PDP navigates these internal disputes, the party’s ability to unite and strategize for upcoming elections remains a critical concern. For further insights into Nigeria’s political landscape, check out our in-depth analysis on Nigerian Political Party Leadership and Election Strategy and Political Alliances. ThisDay Live’s analysis on PDP’s internal conflicts READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Atiku Reveals Why He Passed Over Wike for 2023 Vice Presidential Slot Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has shed light on the reasons behind his decision to overlook Nyesom Wike, the former Governor of Rivers State, as his running mate for the 2023 presidential election under the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). LMSINT MEDIA recalls that Wike lost the PDP presidential primaries to Atiku, and many political analysts speculated that he would be selected as the vice-presidential candidate. However, Atiku ultimately chose Ifeanyi Okowa, the former Governor of Delta State, instead. The Decision That Sparked Political Tensions Atiku’s choice of Okowa over Wike reportedly fueled the ongoing political rift between the two politicians. Wike, who currently serves as the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), was seen by many PDP stakeholders as a strong contender for the vice-presidential slot. In an exclusive interview for the television program “Untold Stories” with journalist Adesuwa Giwa-Osagie, Atiku addressed the controversy surrounding his selection process. The interview, scheduled to air today, delves into his approach to choosing a running mate. Why Atiku Chose Okowa Over Wike Recalling the 2019 election, Atiku stated that he faced criticism for picking Peter Obi as his running mate without extensive consultation within the party. Learning from that experience, he decided to involve the PDP leadership in the 2023 selection process. “They said I did not consult with the party enough. So in 2023, I threw the whole thing to the party. I said, ‘Okay, set up a committee and recommend three people for me to pick as a running mate,’” Atiku explained. According to him, the PDP committee presented three names: Atiku emphasized that his decision was purely based on the committee’s ranking, stating: “So I picked number one.” No Regrets Over His Decision Despite the political fallout from his choice, Atiku remains firm in his stance. When asked if he had any regrets about not selecting Wike, he responded: “No, not at all.” For more insights into Nigeria’s political landscape, visit Premium Times – a trusted source for political analysis and updates. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Key Political Figures Oppose Rivers State Emergency Declaration In a major political development, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate Peter Obi, and ex-Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai have initiated a coalition aimed at challenging President Bola Tinubu’s administration in the 2027 elections. This was confirmed by Atiku during a press conference in Abuja, where he addressed political stakeholders from across the nation. When questioned about the intention behind the gathering, Atiku affirmed that the coalition’s objective is to remove Tinubu from office in the next election cycle. Political Leaders Condemn Tinubu’s Emergency Declaration in Rivers State Atiku, along with other coalition members, has urged Nigerians, particularly members of the National Assembly, to reject Tinubu’s recent declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State, labeling it unconstitutional. According to Atiku: “President Tinubu’s proclamation on March 18, 2025, suspending the democratically elected Governor, Deputy Governor, and State House of Assembly, is an outright violation of Nigeria’s Constitution and an attempt to impose autocratic control.” He further stated that Tinubu’s decision undermines democracy and called on Nigerians to resist what he described as an unconstitutional move. Unlawful Dismissal of Elected Officials Atiku highlighted constitutional breaches, stating that the Nigerian Constitution does not empower the President to remove an elected Governor, Deputy Governor, or the State House of Assembly under any circumstances. He referenced Section 188 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which explicitly outlines the legal procedure for removing a Governor through impeachment by the State House of Assembly. Additionally, Atiku condemned the misuse of Section 305, which allows the declaration of a state of emergency only under extreme national security threats. He asserted that Tinubu’s justification for the emergency rule in Rivers State does not meet the constitutional requirements. Judiciary and National Assembly Must Intervene The coalition is calling for immediate action from the judiciary and the National Assembly to overturn Tinubu’s directive. Atiku stressed that any declaration of emergency must be ratified by a two-thirds majority vote in both legislative chambers. If such approval is not obtained, the proclamation automatically loses its validity. “There is no war or crisis in Rivers State to warrant such an extreme measure. Instead of allowing due legal processes to resolve political disputes, the federal government is exploiting the situation for political gain,” he added. Manufactured Crisis for Political Control The coalition alleges that the crisis in Rivers State is a deliberate political maneuver designed to weaken opposition forces ahead of the 2027 elections. Atiku pointed out that similar security challenges in the past did not result in the removal of elected officials. “Even at the peak of insurgency in the North-East, the then-government did not remove governors but provided security solutions. The Rivers State issue is being exploited to serve Tinubu’s interests,” Atiku noted. Call to Action The coalition demands the immediate reinstatement of the elected Rivers State government and urges lawmakers to reject the unconstitutional action. Additionally, Atiku called on civil society organizations, political stakeholders, and citizens to defend Nigeria’s democracy against executive overreach. Historical Context: Niger Delta Unrest Atiku cautioned against political instability in the Niger Delta, a region historically fraught with conflict. He emphasized that previous administrations worked tirelessly to stabilize the area, warning that Tinubu’s actions could reignite tensions and disrupt national economic stability. Political Heavyweights Join the Movement Other key opposition figures present at the press conference included Yunusa Tanko representing Peter Obi, former SGF Babachir Lawal, ex-Kaduna Governor Nasir El-Rufai, and Peter Ahmeh, National Secretary of the Coalition of United Political Parties. Apologies were sent by notable figures such as former Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi, former Ekiti Governor Kayode Fayemi, and ex-APC National Chairman Abdullahi Adamu. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Atiku Abubakar has accused President Tinubu’s government of suppressing opposition voices through arrests and intimidation. Read more on his claims about a potential one-party system in Nigeria. Atiku Abubakar Criticizes Tinubu’s Administration Amidst Alleged Suppression of Critics Atiku Abubakar, former Vice President of Nigeria, has strongly condemned President Bola Tinubu’s administration over what he describes as a systematic crackdown on opposition voices. His remarks came in response to the prosecution of Omoyele Sowore, the publisher of Sahara Reporters, and the recent arrest of Prof. Usman Yusuf, former Executive Secretary of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). Allegations of Intimidation and Harassment Atiku argues that the arrest and detention of these individuals reflect a growing trend of political intimidation. Prof. Usman Yusuf was taken into custody by operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on January 28, 2025, over allegations of a ₦4 billion fraud. However, Atiku sees this as part of a larger strategy to silence critics of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). In a statement posted on his official X (formerly Twitter) account on January 30, 2025, the 2023 presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) warned that if the government continues on this path, “they may soon imprison everyone who speaks against them.” Atiku Accuses APC of Pushing for One-Party Rule Atiku reaffirmed his stance that the APC is deliberately working towards dismantling opposition parties to establish a one-party system in Nigeria. He claimed that previous warnings about the ruling party’s suppression tactics were dismissed, but recent developments prove his concerns to be valid. “When I made the clarion call that Tinubu and the APC were devoting their energies to the systematic harassment, intimidation, and dismantling of the opposition, all in service of their grand design for a one-party autocracy, I became the target of vicious attacks. The arrest and baseless prosecution of @YeleSowore is the latest chapter in this unrelenting campaign. Now, they have seen fit to add Professor Usman Yusuf— an outspoken critic of this administration— into their grim roster. At the pace they are going, it seems they may soon find themselves contending with the incarceration of every one of us,” he wrote. Opposition Parties Demand Proof of Allegations Atiku’s statement aligns with his earlier accusations that the APC is bribing opposition parties to weaken their influence ahead of the 2027 general elections. Speaking at a national conference in Abuja, he alleged that some opposition party leaders had been offered ₦50 million to compromise their leadership and reduce resistance against the ruling party. This claim has sparked controversy, with opposition parties like the Labour Party (LP) and the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) challenging Atiku to provide concrete evidence to support his allegations. Conclusion The political climate in Nigeria remains tense as opposition figures continue to voice concerns over what they perceive as an authoritarian shift under President Tinubu’s administration. Atiku’s latest outburst adds to the growing criticism of the government’s handling of dissent, fueling debates over the future of democracy in the country. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Chanel.
Kindly Share:
After President Donald Trump was re-elected in the United States, former Nigerian Vice President Atiku Abubakar congratulated him. In a statement released on Wednesday through X, Atiku hailed the result as evidence of democracy’s resilience. He emphasized the significance of genuine elections globally and conveyed his admiration for the US democratic process’s tenacity. “I anxiously watched the United States of America’s presidential election, eager to see how the country will be shaped going forward. I now look back on the outcome with even more satisfaction, as it signals a decisive win for President Donald Trump and the Republican Party,” Atiku said. He said that Trump’s win was a lasting example of the tenacity and energy of the democratic process, highlighting how Trump’s political career is a prime example of bravery in the face of difficulty. “With all its challenges, democracy is still a force for good in the world, and this victory will undoubtedly serve as a lasting testament to the tenacity and vitality of the democratic process,” he said. “The story of President Trump’s political career, characterized by his setbacks and victories, will serve as an uplifting parable of bravery in the face of hardship — a lesson in the art of rising after every setback and, ultimately, emerging victorious.” Atiku claims that Trump’s victory is a motivational tale of tenacity, demonstrating the skill of getting back up after every setback and eventually triumphing. Atiku said he hoped Trump’s The administration will highlight the lesson this holds for Nigeria and push for free and fair elections globally. “The integrity of the process that guarantees a credible outcome is the lesson for us in Nigeria.” Every Nigerian expects the Trump administration to be steadfast in its commitment to free and fair elections in Nigeria and around the globe. Atiku said, “I also want to express my sincere congratulations to the American people, whose unwavering belief in the sanctity of the ballot and the power of democracy has once again demonstrated to the world the true might of the people’s voice.” READ ALSO:
Kindly Share:
The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) presidential candidate for 2023, Atiku Abubakar, claims that if he had won the presidency of Nigeria, his reforms would have “benefited from more adequate preparations” and “more sufficient diagnostic assessment of the country’s conditions.” Abubakar claimed that his policy changes would have “protected our fragile economy against a much deeper crisis by preventing business collapse” in a post on his X account on Sunday. He called President Bola Tinubu’s administration “overkill” for raising the energy cost, floating the currency rate, and eliminating the gasoline subsidy. In order to “first eliminate revenue leakages arising from governance, including the cost of running the government and the government procurement process,” the former vice president stated that he would have set an example. He also said that “alternative approaches to conflict resolution such as diplomacy, intelligence, improved border control, deploying traditional institutions, and good neighborliness” would have been used by his administration. According to Abubakar, he would have established an economic stimulus fund (ESF) “to support MSMEs across all economic sectors with an initial investment capacity of approximately US$10 billion.” The former vice president claimed that even though he supported eliminating the gasoline subsidy, his government would have implemented the measures using “a gradualist approach.” “The abrupt and total elimination of subsidies would not have occurred. We used a gradualist approach while I was vice president, and we finished phases 1 and 2 of the reform before the end of our term, which is instructive,” he added. According to Abubakar, his government would have a “managed-floating system” of foreign exchange. “We would not be able to run an open, private sector-friendly economy under a fixed exchange rate system, so it was out of the question,” he stated. READ ALSO: Police Arrest 17 Nigerians, 113 Foreigners For Cybercrimes, Hacking But, considering Nigeria’s fundamental economic circumstances, implementing a floating exchange rate regime would be overkill. “We would have urged our central bank to handle foreign exchange in a gradualist manner. It would have been better to have a managed-floating system. We love to have you back, Kindly Subscribe to our Newsletter.
Kindly Share:
Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar has criticized the current administration for its “trial-and-error economic policies,” asserting that he would have taken a different approach if he had been elected President. In a statement he personally authored, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate from the last election accused President Tinubu’s government of implementing a “palliative” economy, something he believes should not have been done. Atiku attributed the country’s current economic difficulties to the reforms introduced by the present administration. He noted, “Unleashing reforms to establish a suitable exchange rate, cost-reflective electricity tariffs, and the price of PMS all at once is excessive.” While he supports the removal of subsidies, Atiku emphasized that his administration would have opted for a gradual approach, similar to what countries like Malaysia and Indonesia have done in recent years. He stated, “I’ve received numerous questions about what I would have done differently as President. The focus should be on President Tinubu and the critical actions he needs to take to alleviate the suffering caused by his experimental economic strategies.” Atiku expressed that his administration would have been more strategically planned, emphasizing thorough preparations, better diagnostic assessments of the country’s situation, and more extensive consultations with stakeholders. He pointed out that his reform agenda, outlined in his policy document “My Covenant With Nigerians,” was designed to protect the fragile economy from deeper crises and to support businesses effectively. He further argued, “Implementing reforms for exchange rates, tariffs, and fuel prices simultaneously is clearly overkill. Additionally, the Central Bank’s aggressive monetary tightening is problematic. As importers of petroleum products, removing subsidies without a stable exchange rate will lead to adverse effects.” Atiku insisted that a more strategic response to the fallout from reforms was necessary, highlighting the importance of not overestimating the benefits of reforms or underestimating their costs. He acknowledged that reforms can fail and that he would address institutional weaknesses proactively. He added, “I would have led by example. Any fiscal reforms aimed at improving liquidity must first address governance-related revenue leakages, including unnecessary government expenses. I and my team would not have indulged in luxury while citizens suffered.” The former Vice President emphasized that his reforms would be designed with empathy, advocating for a strong social protection program to genuinely support the poor and vulnerable instead of relying on a “palliative economy.” He outlined specific measures he would implement, including launching an Economic Stimulus Fund (ESF) with an initial capacity of around $10 billion to support micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) across all sectors. Additionally, he proposed a targeted skills-to-job program for youth, addressing both graduates and those currently not engaged in education or employment. Atiku reiterated his long-standing call for subsidy removal on PMS, criticizing the opacity and potential for corruption in its administration. He highlighted the significant profits derived from oil subsidies that benefit certain elites within public and private sectors. He prioritized three main areas: READ ALSO: A Man Jailed For Attempting To Sit 2019 UTME Exam For Daughter In Abuja In summary, Atiku Abubakar presented a comprehensive vision for addressing Nigeria’s economic challenges, contrasting it sharply with the current administration’s approach. We love having you back, Kindly Subscribe to our Newsletter.
