Political Tensions Escalate Over Local Government Leadership in Osun The ongoing political standoff in Osun State has intensified as the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) remain at odds over the Court of Appeal’s ruling on local government elections. APC Demands Recognition of Reinstated Chairmen The APC has accused Governor Ademola Adeleke of misrepresenting the court verdict, urging him to publicly acknowledge the reinstatement of its council chairmen and councillors. According to the party, the Attorney-General of the Federation confirmed the legal authority of the reinstated officials over the local governments. In a statement issued on Thursday, the party’s Director of Media and Information, Kola Olabisi, called on Adeleke to halt any obstruction of local government administration. The APC maintains that the Court of Appeal’s decision on 10 February 2025 legally restored its members to office. The party further alleged that Governor Adeleke ignored legal counsel and proceeded with the 22 February 2025 local government elections despite no legitimate vacancies existing at the time. It also claimed that Adeleke’s representatives held discussions with the Attorney-General concerning the ruling, emphasizing that the governor’s administration was unlawfully managing local government allocations. The APC warned that continued interference would amount to a violation of the rule of law. PDP Denies APC’s Claims, Defends February Elections On the other hand, the Osun PDP has rejected the APC’s assertions, arguing that no court ruling reinstated the dismissed officials. In a statement signed by Osun PDP Chairman, Sunday Bisi, the party accused the APC of spreading misinformation to mislead the public and undermine judicial integrity. The PDP questioned why the APC submitted a fresh application at the Court of Appeal if its officials had already been reinstated. The party reaffirmed that the judgement nullifying the October 2022 elections remains valid. Furthermore, the PDP criticized the APC for allegedly twisting the stance of the Attorney-General of the Federation. According to the PDP, the legal documents submitted to the Attorney-General clearly justified the February 2025 local government elections conducted by the Osun State Independent Electoral Commission (OSSIEC). The party condemned the APC for what it described as an attempt to forcefully seize power through unconstitutional means. The PDP warned that such political maneuvers pose a serious threat to democracy and urged the public to resist any illegitimate takeover of power. Osun Political Battle: What Happens Next? As tensions continue to rise, both parties remain steadfast in their legal positions. While the APC insists that its chairmen and councillors should be recognized, the PDP maintains that the court invalidated their election results. Observers anticipate that this legal and political struggle may have significant implications for the governance and administration of local councils in Osun State. For more updates on Osun politics, visit Premium Times. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Felix Morka, the National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), has justified President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State. According to him, the now-suspended Governor Siminalayi Fubara violated democratic principles, necessitating federal intervention. State of Emergency in Rivers: Tinubu’s Justification Following months of political instability in Rivers State, President Tinubu, in a national address on March 18, 2025, invoked Section 305 of the Nigerian Constitution (1999, as amended) to declare a state of emergency. This move led to the suspension of Governor Fubara, Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu, and all state assembly members for six months. The decision has sparked nationwide debate, with critics questioning the President’s constitutional authority. However, Morka, speaking in an exclusive interview on Eagle 102.5 FM, defended the move, stating that opposition voices have ignored Fubara’s alleged anti-democratic actions. Fubara’s Alleged Undemocratic Actions Morka outlined various steps taken by Fubara that, according to him, threatened democracy: Morka emphasized that these actions violated democratic norms, yet opposition leaders, including Peter Obi, remained silent until the federal government intervened. Security Concerns and National Assembly’s Endorsement The APC spokesperson further noted that intelligence reports had indicated increasing security threats in Rivers, particularly to critical oil infrastructure, including the vandalization of the Trans Niger Pipeline (TNP)—one of Nigeria’s most significant crude oil transport routes. Morka clarified that the National Assembly, with a two-thirds majority across all political parties, later ratified the state of emergency, reinforcing its legitimacy. Suspension of Governor Fubara: Legal Debates One of the most contested aspects of the emergency declaration is Fubara’s suspension. Legal experts, including the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), argue that Section 188 of the Constitution outlines specific steps for a governor’s removal, which were not followed. Morka countered that the governor was not “removed” but suspended as a temporary measure to restore order. He cited Section 5, Subsection 3 of the Constitution, which prohibits governors from exercising executive powers in a way that contradicts federal authority. Criticism of PDP Leaders Morka also criticized Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governors and leaders, accusing them of ignoring the crisis for months and only speaking out after the federal intervention. He questioned why they failed to address Fubara’s alleged unconstitutional actions earlier. Conclusion The state of emergency in Rivers State continues to generate heated debates over governance, constitutional rights, and federal authority. While the APC insists it was a necessary step to stabilize the state, legal and political opposition remain vocal. The coming months will determine the long-term impact of this unprecedented move. For more on Nigeria’s constitutional provisions on emergency powers, visit Nigerian Law Reform Commission. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Dan Orbih Defends Wike’s National Service Amidst PDP Crisis Chief Dan Orbih, the re-elected national vice-chairman (South-South) of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), has clarified the political stance of Nyesom Wike, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). Addressing the controversy surrounding Wike’s role in the APC-led government, Orbih emphasized that Wike’s appointment serves Nigeria rather than partisan interests. Legitimacy of South-South PDP Zonal Congress Orbih reaffirmed that his election followed due constitutional processes, dismissing concerns raised by some party leaders. He acknowledged the support of delegates and vowed to strengthen the party’s presence in the region. He also pointed out that PDP governors do not need to approve every congress for it to be valid, referencing a previous election in Port Harcourt where not all governors were present. Clarification on PDP Leadership’s Stance Responding to claims that the PDP’s National Working Committee (NWC) opposed the South-South congress, Orbih denied any internal discussions against it. He also noted that statements issued by the party’s National Publicity Secretary were unsigned, suggesting internal political maneuvering rather than official opposition. Wike’s Appointment: A Call to National Duty Orbih dismissed allegations that his closeness to Wike fueled the party’s resistance to his position. He asserted that Wike sought approval from all key PDP structures before accepting the ministerial role. Despite misconceptions, PDP stakeholders, including the Board of Trustees and Governors’ Forum, did not object to his participation in the federal government. Challenges Within PDP and the Edo Political Landscape Addressing internal party turmoil, Orbih criticized PDP leaders for neglecting pressing party issues while focusing on political disputes. He pointed out that former Edo State Governor Godwin Obaseki inherited a united PDP but left it deeply fragmented. Recounting past interactions, he mentioned a critical meeting where Governor Bala Mohammed acknowledged Obaseki’s failures but still supported his leadership due to party loyalty. According to Orbih, such political compromises weakened the PDP’s internal structure. Final Thoughts: The Future of PDP Orbih expressed concerns over the PDP’s failure to actively resolve crises, particularly in Rivers State. He called for genuine leadership efforts to rebuild the party rather than engaging in distractions. The party must focus on mobilization and structural reforms to regain political strength. Read More on Nigerian Political Affairs With internal party disputes escalating, the trajectory of the PDP remains uncertain. However, Orbih’s insights shed light on the political dynamics shaping the party’s future. Stay tuned for more updates on Nigeria’s evolving political landscape. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Olajide Adediran, widely known as Jandor, has asserted that he stood a strong chance of winning the 2023 Lagos State governorship election but was hindered by the unexpected surge in support for Peter Obi, the Labour Party (LP) presidential candidate. The ‘Obi Effect’ That Changed Lagos Politics During an interview on Channels Television’s Politics Today, Jandor, the former Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, explained how the overwhelming momentum behind Peter Obi reshaped the electoral landscape in Lagos, weakening the PDP’s chances. “The 2023 election came with a tsunami that nobody anticipated, and it was evident to all,” he remarked. According to him, after Peter Obi secured victory in Lagos during the February 2023 presidential election, the political dynamics leading to the governorship poll took a drastic turn. The Labour Party’s influence surged, making it difficult for the PDP to maintain its competitive edge against the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). Election Results: A Shift in Political Strength The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) declared Babajide Sanwo-Olu, the APC candidate, as the winner with 762,134 votes. Labour Party’s Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour finished second with 312,329 votes, while Jandor came third, securing 62,449 votes. Jandor argued that before the presidential election, the PDP was in a formidable position and posed a strong challenge to the APC. He recalled that his party actively campaigned on the streets of Lagos, while the incumbent governor, Sanwo-Olu, refused to participate in public debates. The Unexpected Political Wave “The 2023 election had its own dynamics. It was a two-horse race until the presidential election. When Peter Obi won in Lagos, it changed everything. People started believing they could take control of the state, and we became victims of that political shift,” Jandor explained. He emphasized that the PDP had worked tirelessly for victory, but the unforeseen ‘Obi effect’ disrupted their strategies. Despite his disappointment, he maintained that the election outcome was not aligned with divine timing. Jandor’s Political Future Beyond PDP Jandor, who began his political career in the APC before leading the Lagos4Lagos Movement and defecting to the PDP in 2022, has recently parted ways with the party, citing internal conflicts and lack of discipline. “We waited for two years, expecting the national leadership of the party to take action against those engaging in anti-party activities. Instead of sanctions, the same individual was appointed Vice Chairman of the Disciplinary Committee,” he stated. Looking ahead to 2027, Jandor confirmed that he is open to joining another political party to advance his governorship ambitions in Lagos State. Read More on Nigerian Politics READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
By LMSINT MEDIA President Tinubu’s New Year message has sparked mixed reactions across Nigeria, with opposing views from APC, PDP, and other groups on his economic promises and policies for 2025. President Bola Tinubu’s New Year address has generated mixed reactions across Nigeria, dividing opinions among political parties and prominent organizations. While the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) praised the speech, describing it as a roadmap to economic recovery, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) criticized it as disconnected and unresponsive to the hardships faced by Nigerians. APC’s Optimism: “Tinubu Is Delivering on His Promises” The APC’s National Secretary, Dr. Ajibola Basiru, expressed confidence in President Tinubu’s leadership, citing his ambitious goals for 2025. Tinubu promised to reduce inflation from 36.4% to 15% and lower food and drug prices through strategic measures. Basiru highlighted the administration’s achievements, including efforts to revamp the Port Harcourt and Warri refineries and encourage local pharmaceutical production to make essential drugs more affordable. He urged critics to support the president’s vision for economic growth, stating, “The President is on the right track. Reducing inflation to 15% is achievable.” PDP’s Criticism: “Disconnected From Nigerians’ Realities” Conversely, the PDP described Tinubu’s address as lacking actionable solutions to Nigeria’s pressing problems. PDP National Publicity Secretary, Hon. Debo Ologunagba, stated that the president failed to outline clear plans for sectors such as electricity, infrastructure, and job creation. “The speech did not offer practical strategies to address the widespread hunger, unemployment, or high petroleum prices that have plagued Nigerians. It confirms the administration’s disconnection from the realities on the ground,” Ologunagba asserted. CUPP and Afenifere Voice Concerns The Coalition of United Political Parties (CUPP) and the Pan-Yoruba socio-political group, Afenifere, also weighed in. CUPP National Secretary, Chief Peter Ameh, criticized the government for taking impulsive decisions in 2024, which he said pushed 56% of Nigerians below the poverty line. Similarly, Afenifere urged the administration to shift from promises to actionable policies. “Inflation and poverty are worsened by subsidy removal and devaluation,” said Afenifere’s Publicity Secretary, Prince Justice Faloye. “We need pro-people economic strategies, not mere optimism.” Diverse Opinions on Tinubu’s Economic Goals Several political and public figures expressed mixed views: Conclusion: A Divided Nation President Tinubu’s New Year message has sparked diverse reactions, highlighting the divide between optimism for economic recovery and criticism of unmet expectations. With 2025 looming, Nigerians await the administration’s actions to address inflation, unemployment, and rising costs. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Chanel.
