The Nigerian Senate has debunked widespread claims that Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central, was suspended due to allegations of sexual harassment against Senate President Godswill Akpabio. Instead, the legislative body clarified that her suspension resulted from repeated violations of Senate Standing Orders 2023 (As Amended) and a pattern of unparliamentary behavior.
Why Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Was Suspended
According to Senate Leader Senator Opeyemi Bamidele, Akpoti-Uduaghan was sanctioned for disregarding Sections 6.1 and 6.2 of the Senate’s procedural rules. In a statement released on Saturday, Bamidele refuted media reports insinuating that her suspension stemmed from accusations against Akpabio, labeling such claims as misleading and deliberately deceptive.
Following the recommendations of its Committee on Ethics and Privileges, the Senate imposed a six-month suspension on Akpoti-Uduaghan, citing misconduct and her refusal to adhere to assigned seating arrangements during plenary sessions. However, the chamber provided an opportunity for reconsideration, stating that if Akpoti-Uduaghan submits a formal apology, the leadership may lift the suspension before the six-month period elapses.
Instead of adhering to Senate protocols, Akpoti-Uduaghan allegedly misled the public by claiming she was targeted for her sexual harassment allegations. Bamidele emphasized that disciplinary action against the senator was solely based on her conduct and non-compliance with established legislative rules.
Procedural Flaws in Sexual Harassment Petition
Bamidele further disclosed that Akpoti-Uduaghan’s petition on sexual harassment failed to meet the Senate’s procedural requirements for submitting complaints. He reiterated that if she had followed due process, the petition would have been assessed on merit.
“The Senate has noted various misleading media reports falsely linking Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension to allegations of sexual harassment. This narrative is entirely incorrect. The senator’s failure to adhere to Senate guidelines led to disciplinary action,” the statement read.
The Ethics and Privileges Committee found Akpoti-Uduaghan guilty of breaching Senate Standing Orders, leading to her suspension. The violations cited in the report include:
- Disorderly Conduct: Refusal to occupy her designated seat despite repeated requests by the Minority Leader and other ranking senators on February 25, 2025.
- Violation of Parliamentary Rules: Speaking without being recognized by the presiding officer during plenary.
- Disruptive Behavior: Engaging in actions that obstructed the smooth conduct of Senate proceedings.
- Abusive Remarks: Making disparaging and disrespectful comments against the Senate leadership.
Public Trust and Democratic Implications
The Advocacy for Integrity and Rule of Law (AIRL), a civic rights organization, has warned that the Senate’s handling of Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension could erode public trust and jeopardize democratic values. AIRL Chairman, Mohammed Ibrahim Gamawa, stressed the need for legislative restraint, warning that denying Akpoti-Uduaghan’s constituency representation could damage the Senate’s reputation.
The group described the ongoing Senate dispute as a “show of shame” that could undermine Nigeria’s democratic institutions. AIRL urged the 10th Senate to prioritize national interest and resolve the conflict through dialogue to prevent long-term political instability.
Conclusion
As tensions persist, stakeholders continue to call for transparency in governance. The Senate’s actions and responses will determine whether this controversy fades or escalates into a larger political crisis. To maintain institutional credibility, political leaders must act in accordance with democratic principles and constitutional provisions.
Premium Times
READ ALSO:
Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp:
Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear:
Kindly Share:
Discover more from LMSINT MEDIA
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.