ABUJA – The National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Dr. Abdullahi Umar Ganduje, has asserted that the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is disintegrating at an alarming pace. This follows the mass defection of support groups that previously backed Atiku Abubakar in the 2023 presidential elections to the ruling APC. Ganduje made this statement during an official reception event on Thursday at the A-Class Event Centre in Abuja. The event witnessed the formal defection of the Coalition of Atiku Support Groups from the 19 Northern States, with representatives pledging their allegiance to APC and endorsing President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s bid for re-election in 2027. Why Atiku’s Supporters Are Leaving PDP Speaking on behalf of the defectors, Hon. Abubakar Malami, the coalition’s coordinator, explained that their decision was driven by President Tinubu’s governance policies and the leadership of Senator Barau Jibrin, Deputy President of the Senate. “Our coalition comprises women, youths, students, traders, scholars, and farmers from different walks of life,” Malami stated. “In 2023, we actively mobilized for Atiku Abubakar, believing he would address Nigeria’s pressing concerns, particularly insecurity and economic challenges. However, under President Tinubu, we have observed meaningful progress, including enhanced security measures and economic policies that have led to a decrease in food prices and renewed optimism for the region.” Malami also commended the establishment of the North West Development Commission (NWDC) and the North Central Development Commission (NCDC), both of which were spearheaded by Senator Barau Jibrin to boost economic recovery in the northern region. “One of the most impactful policies introduced is the Barau Initiative for Agricultural Revolution in the North West (BIARN), which aims to produce over 500 young farmer millionaires. If this initiative is expanded to the North East and North Central, Nigeria will achieve food security while significantly reducing youth unemployment,” Malami added. APC Welcomes Defectors, Labels Move a ‘Game-Changer’ Welcoming the new members, Senator Barau Jibrin described their defection as a “major victory” for APC. He emphasized that the party is dedicated to transforming Nigeria and assured the defectors of full inclusion within the party’s ranks. “This is a significant gain for our party,” Barau declared. “President Tinubu is working tirelessly to drive Nigeria towards prosperity, and we are pleased that you recognize and support his vision.” He further reassured them, saying: “In the APC, there is no discrimination. Whether you are a newcomer or a founding member, you will enjoy equal opportunities. Your contributions and dedication to the party’s progress are what truly matter.” PDP’s Decline ‘Unstoppable’ – Ganduje In his remarks, APC National Chairman Dr. Abdullahi Umar Ganduje reinforced that the continued defections signal the PDP’s downfall. “Today, we officially welcome you, but after Ramadan, we will host a grand event in Abuja, where President Tinubu, the Vice President, the Senate President, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives will celebrate the final collapse of the PDP,” Ganduje announced. He highlighted the PDP’s internal struggles, citing the party’s inability to field a governorship candidate in Anambra State as clear evidence of its weakening influence. “The PDP is crumbling at a remarkable rate, and the APC stands as the ultimate beneficiary,” Ganduje stated. “By joining us, you are now part of a party that prioritizes progress, the rule of law, democratic principles, and peaceful governance.” He also acknowledged Senator Barau Jibrin’s efforts in attracting new members: “His influence extends beyond Kano; he is pulling people from all over Nigeria. He is a true leader in this political transformation.” With these defections, APC continues to consolidate its political influence in Northern Nigeria, strategically positioning itself for a dominant performance in the 2027 general elections. Read more on Nigeria’s Political Developments READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Emerging details indicate deep divisions within the Nigerian Senate regarding the recent suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan (PDP, Kogi Central) for six months. Controversy Over Senate Ethics Committee’s Decision Concerns have been raised about the swift actions taken by the Senate Committee on Ethics, Code of Conduct, and Public Petitions, chaired by Senator Neda Imaseun (LP, Edo South), in processing the disciplinary case against Akpoti-Uduaghan. Several senators, including senior members, were unavailable due to a tax reform retreat organized by the Senate Committee on Finance. Despite this, the hearing was unexpectedly expedited, raising suspicions about the motive behind the process. A high-ranking senator, who chose to remain anonymous, revealed that the initial date for the hearing was Tuesday, March 11. However, it was abruptly rescheduled, leaving many lawmakers questioning the urgency. He noted, “This process was unnecessarily rushed. Why the urgency? Why couldn’t the committee wait for full participation? The absence of senior Senators during the proceedings suggests the outcome was predetermined.” Additionally, the senator criticized the committee for proceeding despite a court injunction that had temporarily halted the investigation. “As lawmakers, we must adhere to due process. This was why 13 of us refused to sign the report,” he explained. Details of Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Suspension On Thursday, the Senate imposed a six-month suspension on Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan for allegedly violating the Senate Standing Rules 2023 (as amended). The disciplinary action followed her protest over the reassignment of her seat by Senate President Godswill Akpabio on February 20. The Senate justified the suspension by claiming she had brought the presiding officer and the chamber into disrepute. As part of the suspension terms: Initially, the committee’s report recommended that salaries for her legislative aides be halted as well. However, a motion introduced by former Chief Whip Senator Orji Uzor Kalu (APC, Abia North) and supported by Senator Ned Nwoko (APC, Delta North) ensured that her aides would continue receiving their payments. Senate Minority Leader Senator Abba Moro (PDP, Benue South) had appealed for a reduction of the suspension period to three months, but his plea was rejected by the chamber. Background of the Suspension The suspension stemmed from a heated exchange during a Senate plenary session after Akpoti-Uduaghan discovered that her seat had been reassigned, and her nameplate removed. This led to a tense standoff as she demanded an explanation from Senate leadership. The Senate has indicated that it may reconsider her suspension if she formally submits a written apology. External Insights and Public Reactions This suspension has sparked widespread debate regarding legislative due process and internal political dynamics. According to a report by Premium Times, political analysts argue that the situation exposes underlying rifts within the Senate and raises concerns about fairness in handling disciplinary measures against lawmakers. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Legal experts have strongly criticized the Nigerian Senate’s six-month suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan (PDP, Kogi Central), calling it unconstitutional and a violation of her fundamental rights. According to prominent lawyers, the Senate’s action disregarded a valid court injunction and could set a dangerous precedent for legislative overreach in Nigeria. Court Order Ignored in Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Suspension The Senate announced Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension on Thursday, just a day after Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court in Abuja issued an order preventing the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Code of Conduct from investigating her over alleged misconduct. The court had mandated the Senate to justify its inquiry within 72 hours, yet the legislative body proceeded with the suspension in defiance of the ruling. Legal Experts Condemn Senate’s Action A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Kunle Edun, described the suspension as a blatant breach of legal principles. He emphasized that Senate Rule 67(4) only permits suspensions for a maximum of 14 days, making Akpoti-Uduaghan’s six-month suspension unconstitutional. “I strongly oppose the suspension of Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan. The Senate, which should uphold the law, has instead violated it. Moreover, since the issue is before the court, it is sub judice. The Senate’s Ethics Committee cannot admit this fact on one hand and contradict itself by suspending her,” Edun stated. He further criticized the Senate’s disregard for the principle of separation of powers, explaining that ignoring a court order is an unlawful act. “Any disagreement with the court’s decision should have been legally challenged rather than outrightly disobeyed. The legislature cannot place itself above the judiciary.” Violation of Democratic Principles Prominent lawyer and activist Deji Adeyanju also condemned the Senate’s actions, arguing that the suspension was not just illegal but also an attempt to silence Akpoti-Uduaghan amid her petition against Senate President Godswill Akpabio over allegations of sexual harassment. “I find the suspension deeply troubling. It is a clear violation of democratic values and fundamental human rights,” Adeyanju stated. He further expressed concerns over the Ethics Committee’s neutrality, pointing out that its chairman had previously defended Akpabio, creating a conflict of interest. “It is unacceptable that neither Akpoti-Uduaghan nor Akpabio was invited for proper questioning. The lack of due process in this matter reflects the same flaws we see in Nigeria’s electoral system,” he added. Background of the Controversy The tension between Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Senate leadership escalated on February 20, 2025, when she protested the reassignment of her Senate seat by Akpabio. Following this, the matter was referred to the Ethics Committee, but Akpoti-Uduaghan declined to appear, citing the court order preventing any probe. Her suspension also followed her renewed efforts to present a sexual harassment petition against Akpabio, which had initially been blocked but was later referred to the Ethics Committee for consideration. Akpoti-Uduaghan Responds to Suspension Reacting to the development, Akpoti-Uduaghan denounced the Senate’s action as unfair and undemocratic. “In defiance of intimidation and the culture of silence, my unjust suspension violates natural justice and fairness. However, this illegal action does not revoke my legitimacy as a senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. I remain committed to serving my constituents and my country,” she affirmed. Conclusion The controversial suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan raises significant legal and democratic concerns. Experts argue that ignoring a court ruling undermines the rule of law, setting a troubling precedent. As the debate continues, Nigerians will be watching closely to see how this matter unfolds and whether the judiciary will assert its authority over legislative excesses. Constitutional Rights and Legislative Limits READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
PORT HARCOURT – Tensions have intensified in Rivers State as the Niger Delta Rescue Movement (NDRM), a militant group, issued a stern warning to the Federal Government, demanding the immediate release of the state’s allocation. Failure to comply, they warned, could result in a complete shutdown of oil production in the region. The militant group also called on non-indigenes residing in Rivers State to leave for their safety, citing an imminent escalation of hostilities. Militants Warn of Oil Disruption NDRM emphasized that unless the Federal Government and all stakeholders involved in the political turmoil take necessary actions to de-escalate the crisis, they would not hesitate to disrupt national oil production. The warning follows the Supreme Court’s ruling last Friday, which upheld a lower court’s decision to withhold Rivers State’s allocation until the House of Assembly, with Martin Amaewhule as Speaker, is fully constituted. Following the ruling, Speaker Amaewhule on Monday gave Governor Siminalayi Fubara a 48-hour deadline to present the 2025 budget to the Assembly. This ultimatum expired at midnight on Wednesday. House of Assembly’s Controversial Directives In response to the budget deadline lapse, the Amaewhule-led House instructed the governor to dismiss all commissioners and political appointees and submit a new list of nominees for screening. A video circulating on social media features approximately eight armed militants wielding AK-47 rifles in an undisclosed forest. In the video, they chanted “asawana, asawana,” a well-known slogan among the Ijaw people of the Niger Delta region. The supposed leader of the group, reading from a letter, stated: “We, the Niger Delta Rescue Movement, express deep concern over the recent developments in Rivers State, which threaten the governance of our beloved state under Governor Fubara. The demand for a 48-hour ultimatum to present the state budget is a deliberate move to destabilize Rivers State, incite chaos, and possibly pave the way for a state of emergency or impeachment. “We urge President Bola Tinubu to intervene immediately and halt the actions of Minister Nyesom Wike and his associates, who are pushing Rivers State towards an avoidable crisis. The people of Rivers State deserve stability, progress, and a conducive environment for governance.” Ultimatum on Federal Allocation and Non-Indigenes’ Safety NDRM further warned that if the federal allocation due to Rivers State is not promptly released, they will take decisive action, including targeting oil production. “We cannot continue generating revenue for the Federation Account while being denied our rightful share. Our workers deserve salaries, and our government requires resources for essential development projects.” Additionally, they urged non-indigenes in the state to consider their safety and evacuate as the situation might escalate. CISLAC Condemns Political Instability, Calls Actions Treasonable Meanwhile, the Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC) has strongly condemned the ongoing political instability in Rivers State, describing the actions against Governor Fubara as treasonable. Gimba Hassan, Legal Manager of the Transition Monitoring Group (TMG) and a CISLAC representative, asserted that the recent political maneuvers against the governor contain elements of treason under Section 37 of the Criminal Code Act and treasonable felony under Section 40 of the same Act. He cited various unlawful actions, including: “These acts were clearly intended to intimidate and subdue the governor, fitting the legal definitions of treason and treasonable felony,” Hassan explained. He also criticized the Rivers State House of Assembly for issuing an illegal 48-hour ultimatum for the budget presentation, stating that such a directive lacks legal backing. Citing the case El-Rufai vs. House of Representatives (2003) and the Legislative Houses (Powers and Privileges) Act, Hassan pointed out that a legislative summons must provide at least seven days’ notice. “With the Supreme Court’s ruling, governance in Rivers State has been stalled. Instead of resolving the crisis, the House of Assembly is worsening it by going on a 12-week recess. This is unacceptable,” he stated. Call for Peaceful Resolution Hassan urged all political stakeholders in Rivers State to resolve their differences and prioritize the state’s progress. He emphasized that the Nigerian constitution begins with “We the People,” highlighting that governance should reflect the people’s will and best interests. For further insights on political and economic developments in Nigeria, visit Premium Times. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
The All Progressives Congress (APC) National Working Committee (NWC) has officially decided to use the indirect primary system to select its governorship candidate for the upcoming Anambra State election scheduled for November 8, 2025. APC’s Decision on Indirect Primary Speaking to journalists in Abuja after the NWC meeting on Thursday, Mr. Ajibola Basiru, the party’s National Secretary, confirmed the adoption of the indirect primary method. “Our deliberations focused on the processes for the forthcoming Anambra governorship election, and it was resolved that the candidate will emerge through an indirect primary,” Basiru stated. He explained that this decision was reached following consultations with APC’s State Working Committee (SWC) and key stakeholders to ensure inclusiveness. Stakeholders’ Meeting and Fair Electoral Process To further discuss the primary process, the APC leadership will hold a stakeholders’ meeting with the State Working Committee, State Caucus, and aspirants at the party’s headquarters at a later date. Basiru reassured party members that the primary election would be conducted transparently, ensuring a level playing field for all aspirants. APC’s Engagement on Renewed Hope Agenda The NWC also reviewed plans to commence interactions with government appointees regarding the achievements of President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda after Ramadan. Basiru noted that these engagements will provide insight into the progress and challenges faced by various ministries, departments, and agencies (MDAs), strengthening collaboration between the party and the government. APC’s E-Registration and Party Membership Expansion The ongoing e-registration of APC members was also a key topic at the NWC meeting. Basiru revealed that the consultants handling the project had been mobilized, and essential equipment and software had been acquired to ensure a seamless registration process. “Our objective is to establish a membership register with high integrity before the next election. This will allow for better demographic analysis within the party,” Basiru emphasized. APC Raises N350 Million from Anambra Governorship Aspirants According to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), APC has generated N350 million from the sale of Expression of Interest and Nomination forms to seven aspirants. List of APC Aspirants for Anambra Guber Ticket The seven aspirants who have purchased the forms and will compete in the April 5 primary include: The APC governorship primary election is expected to be a closely contested race, with each aspirant vying for the party’s ticket to represent APC in the Anambra 2025 gubernatorial election. External Link & Reference For more updates on the Anambra election, visit the official website of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC): INEC Official Website READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
The Nigerian House of Representatives recently took a significant step towards enhancing election transparency by passing a bill for the second reading. This bill seeks to establish an Independent Authority responsible for the registration, regulation, and funding of political parties in Nigeria, effectively reducing the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) control over political parties. What the Bill Proposes Co-sponsored by Speaker Tajudeen Abbas and Marcus Onobun from Edo State, the bill aims to shift critical responsibilities from INEC to a new independent body. Key proposals of the bill include: Why an Independent Authority? During the presentation, Marcus Onobun emphasized the need for a separation of powers. He argued that allowing INEC to both regulate political parties and conduct elections could compromise election integrity. Establishing a separate authority would ensure compliance with constitutional requirements and promote fairer electoral processes. Next Steps for the Bill After a voice vote by Speaker Abbas, the bill received overwhelming support and was referred to the Committees on Electoral Matters and Political Party Matters for further legislative action. If passed into law, this bill could transform Nigeria’s political landscape by providing a more impartial and effective regulatory framework. For more information on Nigeria’s electoral laws, visit INEC’s official website. This development is a critical move toward a more transparent electoral process in Nigeria. Stay updated on this and other political news by following LMSINT MEDIA for accurate and timely insights. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
The Nigerian House of Representatives has passed for second reading a bill proposing the creation of an Independent Authority responsible for the registration, regulation, and funding of political parties in Nigeria. The bill, co-sponsored by Speaker Tajudeen Abbas and Hon. Marcus Onobun (Edo State), aims to shift these responsibilities from the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to a new autonomous body. Key Highlights of the Bill Why an Independent Authority? Co-sponsor Marcus Onobun emphasized the need for a distinct regulatory body, stating, “INEC should not regulate political parties while also conducting elections. Establishing an independent authority will enhance adherence to constitutional guidelines and improve the transparency of electoral processes.” Next Steps After receiving widespread support through a voice vote led by Speaker Abbas, the bill has been forwarded to the Committees on Electoral Matters and Political Party Matters for further legislative scrutiny. External Link For more insights into electoral reforms in Nigeria, visit INEC’s Official Website. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Overview Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has been suspended for six months by the Nigerian Senate following a sexual harassment allegation against Senate President Godswill Akpabio. The decision was made during Thursday’s plenary session based on the recommendation of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions. Suspension Details The suspension entails the withdrawal of Akpoti-Uduaghan’s salary and security details. She is also barred from accessing the National Assembly premises. Her office will be locked, and her legislative aides will not receive salaries during this period. The Senate confirmed there would be no reconsideration of her status until the six-month suspension ends or if she issues a formal apology. What Led to the Suspension? The suspension stems from a recent incident where Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan protested the reassignment of her seat by Senate President Godswill Akpabio. She arrived at a plenary session to find her nameplate removed and her seat reassigned. She saw this as an attempt to silence her voice within the Senate. Senate’s Stand The Ethics Committee initially recommended a six-month suspension, which was later reduced to three months after a plea by Senate Minority Leader Senator Abba Moro (PDP, Benue South). However, the Senate voted overwhelmingly to uphold the six-month suspension as advised by the Senate Committee on Ethics, Code of Conduct, and Public Petitions. Senate Minority Leader Abba Moro supported the disciplinary action, likening it to “correcting a child,” drawing on Nigerian cultural norms. Steps to Appeal To appeal the suspension, Akpoti-Uduaghan must submit a formal written apology to the Senate, acknowledging the alleged violation of Senate rules. External Link For more information on the Nigerian Senate’s code of conduct, visit the Official Nigerian Senate Website. Conclusion This suspension serves as a reminder of the stringent measures the Senate can take to maintain decorum. It also highlights the ongoing discourse on gender and power dynamics within Nigerian politics. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
US President Donald Trump has accused Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of leveraging the ongoing Canada-US trade conflict to maintain his hold on power. This claim followed what Trump described as a “somewhat friendly” conversation between the two leaders on Wednesday. In a social media statement, Trump alleged that Trudeau was unable to specify when Canada’s next federal election would take place, leading him to suspect that the prime minister was using the trade tensions to extend his leadership. Trudeau, who announced his resignation in January, is set to step down after the Liberal Party elects a new leader this weekend. The selected candidate will assume the role of prime minister and possess the authority to call the country’s next general election, which must occur no later than October. However, analysts suggest it could happen sooner. Unlike the US, Canada allows its prime ministers to call elections at any point within a five-year term, offering Trudeau’s successor flexibility in setting the date. Since Trump’s return to the White House in January, tensions between him and Trudeau have escalated, particularly over trade policies and the issue of fentanyl trafficking. This week, Trump moved forward with imposing a 25% tariff on Canadian imports, prompting Trudeau to express frustration. He acknowledged Trump’s intelligence but criticized the tariffs as a “very dumb thing to do.” Trudeau further accused Trump of deliberately attempting to destabilize Canada’s economy, potentially making it easier for annexation—a claim that echoes Trump’s previous remarks about making Canada the 51st US state. Trump has consistently referred to Trudeau as “Governor Trudeau,” underscoring his critical stance towards the Canadian leader. CNN Report on US-Canada Trade Dispute – BBC Analysis on Canada-US Relations READ A;LSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Chanel.
Kindly Share:
Senate Rules Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Petition Procedurally Invalid Abuja – The Nigerian Senate has officially dismissed a petition submitted by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan (PDP, Kogi Central) against Senate President Godswill Akpabio, in which she alleged misconduct. The Senate Committee on Ethics, Code of Conduct, and Public Petitions, chaired by Senator Neda Imasuen (LP, Edo South), declared the petition invalid due to procedural errors and legal constraints. During the probe session on Wednesday, Senator Imasuen stated that Akpoti-Uduaghan’s petition was “dead on arrival” as it failed to comply with Order 40 of the Senate Standing Orders. He explained that the senator personally signed the document rather than having it endorsed by another party, which rendered it procedurally flawed. Additionally, he emphasized that the allegations contained in the petition were already being addressed in court, making them sub judice and beyond the Senate’s purview. Despite being scheduled to appear before the committee at 2:00 PM, Akpoti-Uduaghan failed to attend the session, which eventually commenced at 2:58 PM. Senator Yemi Adaramodu (APC, Ekiti South), who was also expected at the meeting, arrived late but was present when the deliberations began. The petition stemmed from an earlier plenary session incident involving Akpoti-Uduaghan and Senate President Akpabio. Following the incident, the matter was referred to the Senate Ethics Committee for a detailed review. The committee was mandated to conduct a thorough investigation and present its findings within two weeks. Senator Adaramodu highlighted that Akpoti-Uduaghan’s public dispute with the Senate President, particularly regarding seat allocation, had adversely impacted the Senate’s image. He further referenced an interview she granted on Brekete Family via Human Rights Radio and TV, where she restated her claims against Akpabio. Following these deliberations, the Senate reaffirmed its decision to reject the petition based on the procedural violations and legal restrictions surrounding the case. For further updates on Nigerian legislative affairs, visit Premium Times and stay informed about developments in the National Assembly. Premium Times – Nigerian Legislative Updates READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Political Turmoil as Rivers Assembly Demands Removal of Commissioners The Rivers State House of Assembly, primarily composed of loyalists to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, has intensified efforts to challenge Governor Siminalayi Fubara’s administration. In a new development, the Speaker, Rt. Hon. Martins Amaewhule, has officially requested the dismissal of 19 commissioners and political appointees who, according to the Assembly, were not properly screened. Amaewhule, in a letter addressed to the governor on Wednesday, asserted that these appointments violated the 1999 Constitution, as they were made without legislative approval. He further urged Governor Fubara to submit a new list of nominees for screening and proper vetting by the Assembly. This demand marks an escalation in the ongoing rift between the state legislature and the executive branch, deepening the already intense political crisis in Rivers State. One of the critical issues raised in the letter was the governor’s failure to present Dagogo Iboroma for screening as the Attorney General and Commissioner of Justice, which, according to the Speaker, contravenes sections 192 (2) and (5) and section 195 (1) of the 1999 Constitution as amended. The Assembly further insisted that Governor Fubara submit a fresh list of nominees for various executive positions within 48 hours. Commissioner for Environment Dismisses Lawmakers’ Demands Reacting to the Assembly’s directive, Rivers State Commissioner for Environment, Hon. Sydney Tambari, strongly opposed the move, stating that the lawmakers were overstepping their constitutional bounds. He described their actions as baseless and politically motivated. Tambari emphasized that all the commissioners had already been screened and confirmed by the former Speaker of the House, Rt. Hon. Edison Ehie, who was legally recognized by the courts as the legitimate Speaker at the time. He further argued that following Ehie’s resignation, his successor, Rt. Hon. Victor Oko-Jumbo, continued the screening process, making the Assembly’s request redundant. “There is no need for Governor Fubara to submit a fresh list. The commissioners were duly screened, and the demand for their removal is irrelevant,” Tambari stated. He also took a swipe at the lawmakers, pointing out that their actions were inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s ruling, which focused on the 2024 budget rather than the removal of commissioners and political appointees. According to him, the budget presentation falls solely under the governor’s discretion and has already been addressed. Escalating Political Crisis in Rivers State This latest confrontation between the Rivers State executive and legislature further underscores the deep-seated political tensions affecting governance in the state. With both factions standing their ground, the political atmosphere remains uncertain, raising concerns over the stability of governance in Rivers State. For further reading on constitutional provisions regarding political appointments, visit Nigeria’s Constitution READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Washington (AFP) – Former US President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had informed him of Kyiv’s willingness to engage in peace talks with Russia. Additionally, discussions regarding a crucial US-Ukraine mineral agreement were nearing finalization. This statement follows their highly publicized White House meeting, which has fueled diplomatic tensions. Strained US-Ukraine Relations Amid Suspended Military Aid The recent fallout between the United States and Ukraine has unfolded in public view, particularly after Trump’s controversial remarks in the Oval Office last week. The US decision to suspend key military assistance to Ukraine has further strained the alliance between both nations. In an attempt to mend ties, Zelensky posted on social media, expressing regret over the conflict and his desire to “make things right.” Trump later read a letter in Congress that echoed this sentiment, confirming Ukraine’s commitment to peace negotiations. Ukraine Open to Peace Talks and Mineral Agreement Addressing US lawmakers, Trump quoted Zelensky’s statement: “Ukraine is ready to engage in negotiations as soon as possible to advance lasting peace. No one desires peace more than the Ukrainian people.” The Ukrainian president also acknowledged America’s contributions in helping Ukraine maintain its sovereignty. Additionally, Trump stated that Ukraine was ready to finalize a mineral and security agreement with the US at any convenient time. This deal, which was left unsigned following last week’s White House meeting, would grant the US access to Ukraine’s valuable mineral resources. Tensions Rise as Trump Halts Military Assistance Trump’s unexpected halt to military aid for Ukraine has triggered strong reactions from allies. The European Union, excluded from US-Russia peace discussions, expressed concern that any proposed truce might favor Moscow. Meanwhile, Russia welcomed Trump’s decision, with Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov describing it as “a step that could encourage Ukraine to seek a peaceful resolution.” The New York Times reported that this suspension affects millions of dollars’ worth of military supplies originally destined for Ukraine. Backlash from Ukraine and NATO Allies Many Ukrainians viewed Trump’s decision as a betrayal. A Kyiv-based financial analyst named Sofia described it as “a stab in the back.” Army volunteer Sergiy Sternenko accused Trump of advocating Ukraine’s surrender. Poland also criticized the US move, stating that NATO allies had not been consulted. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou informed lawmakers that entire shipments of US military supplies bound for Ukraine had been halted. Proposed Truce and Military Deployment Concerns Reports indicate that Britain and France are exploring a temporary one-month ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, potentially supported by ground troops. This development has sparked debate, with US Vice President JD Vance ridiculing the idea of European nations deploying troops. While the future of the US-Ukraine partnership remains uncertain, Zelensky reaffirmed Kyiv’s readiness to proceed with the mineral agreement and continue seeking robust security guarantees for Ukraine. Conclusion With diplomatic tensions escalating and geopolitical shifts unfolding, the fate of Ukraine’s negotiations with both the US and Russia remains unclear. While Trump’s latest remarks indicate a willingness to push for peace, the broader international response suggests a complex and uncertain road ahead. The New York Times READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Chanel.
Kindly Share:
Olajide Adediran, widely known as Jandor, has asserted that he stood a strong chance of winning the 2023 Lagos State governorship election but was hindered by the unexpected surge in support for Peter Obi, the Labour Party (LP) presidential candidate. The ‘Obi Effect’ That Changed Lagos Politics During an interview on Channels Television’s Politics Today, Jandor, the former Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, explained how the overwhelming momentum behind Peter Obi reshaped the electoral landscape in Lagos, weakening the PDP’s chances. “The 2023 election came with a tsunami that nobody anticipated, and it was evident to all,” he remarked. According to him, after Peter Obi secured victory in Lagos during the February 2023 presidential election, the political dynamics leading to the governorship poll took a drastic turn. The Labour Party’s influence surged, making it difficult for the PDP to maintain its competitive edge against the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). Election Results: A Shift in Political Strength The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) declared Babajide Sanwo-Olu, the APC candidate, as the winner with 762,134 votes. Labour Party’s Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour finished second with 312,329 votes, while Jandor came third, securing 62,449 votes. Jandor argued that before the presidential election, the PDP was in a formidable position and posed a strong challenge to the APC. He recalled that his party actively campaigned on the streets of Lagos, while the incumbent governor, Sanwo-Olu, refused to participate in public debates. The Unexpected Political Wave “The 2023 election had its own dynamics. It was a two-horse race until the presidential election. When Peter Obi won in Lagos, it changed everything. People started believing they could take control of the state, and we became victims of that political shift,” Jandor explained. He emphasized that the PDP had worked tirelessly for victory, but the unforeseen ‘Obi effect’ disrupted their strategies. Despite his disappointment, he maintained that the election outcome was not aligned with divine timing. Jandor’s Political Future Beyond PDP Jandor, who began his political career in the APC before leading the Lagos4Lagos Movement and defecting to the PDP in 2022, has recently parted ways with the party, citing internal conflicts and lack of discipline. “We waited for two years, expecting the national leadership of the party to take action against those engaging in anti-party activities. Instead of sanctions, the same individual was appointed Vice Chairman of the Disciplinary Committee,” he stated. Looking ahead to 2027, Jandor confirmed that he is open to joining another political party to advance his governorship ambitions in Lagos State. Read More on Nigerian Politics READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
