Atiku Abubakar Calls for Urgent Restructuring, Signals Political Shift Atiku Abubakar, former Vice President of Nigeria and the 2023 presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), has reiterated the urgent need for restructuring in Nigeria. Speaking at a coalition meeting in Yola, he emphasized that restructuring is essential for the nation’s stability and democracy to thrive. Atiku expressed deep concerns about the country’s trajectory, warning that failure to implement necessary reforms could leave future generations feeling alienated in their homeland. He urged political leaders and citizens alike to take decisive action to prevent further national decline. Hints at a Major Political Announcement During his address, Atiku subtly indicated that he might be making a significant political declaration soon. While he refrained from providing details, he assured Nigerians that he would soon break his silence on critical national matters. His remarks have sparked speculation about a potential new political movement or candidacy ahead of the next election cycle. Political Support and Cross-Party Influence The gathering witnessed attendance from influential politicians across party lines, including Senator Ishaku Abbo. Abbo reaffirmed Atiku’s leadership, emphasizing that his influence extends beyond partisan affiliations. He also praised Atiku’s tenure as Vice President, highlighting his commitment to democratic principles and governance reforms. Notably, representatives from all 21 local government areas in Adamawa State were present, including members of the All Progressives Congress (APC) affiliated with Senator Aishatu Binani, the party’s 2023 governorship candidate. This cross-party attendance underscores Atiku’s enduring political relevance and the widespread support for restructuring. The Road Ahead for Nigeria’s Political Landscape As Nigeria grapples with economic and governance challenges, Atiku’s call for restructuring reignites the national debate on federalism and equitable resource distribution. His potential political move could reshape the country’s political dynamics ahead of the next elections. For further insights into Nigeria’s restructuring discourse, read this comprehensive analysis from a reputable think tank. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Felix Morka, the National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), has justified President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State. According to him, the now-suspended Governor Siminalayi Fubara violated democratic principles, necessitating federal intervention. State of Emergency in Rivers: Tinubu’s Justification Following months of political instability in Rivers State, President Tinubu, in a national address on March 18, 2025, invoked Section 305 of the Nigerian Constitution (1999, as amended) to declare a state of emergency. This move led to the suspension of Governor Fubara, Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu, and all state assembly members for six months. The decision has sparked nationwide debate, with critics questioning the President’s constitutional authority. However, Morka, speaking in an exclusive interview on Eagle 102.5 FM, defended the move, stating that opposition voices have ignored Fubara’s alleged anti-democratic actions. Fubara’s Alleged Undemocratic Actions Morka outlined various steps taken by Fubara that, according to him, threatened democracy: Morka emphasized that these actions violated democratic norms, yet opposition leaders, including Peter Obi, remained silent until the federal government intervened. Security Concerns and National Assembly’s Endorsement The APC spokesperson further noted that intelligence reports had indicated increasing security threats in Rivers, particularly to critical oil infrastructure, including the vandalization of the Trans Niger Pipeline (TNP)—one of Nigeria’s most significant crude oil transport routes. Morka clarified that the National Assembly, with a two-thirds majority across all political parties, later ratified the state of emergency, reinforcing its legitimacy. Suspension of Governor Fubara: Legal Debates One of the most contested aspects of the emergency declaration is Fubara’s suspension. Legal experts, including the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), argue that Section 188 of the Constitution outlines specific steps for a governor’s removal, which were not followed. Morka countered that the governor was not “removed” but suspended as a temporary measure to restore order. He cited Section 5, Subsection 3 of the Constitution, which prohibits governors from exercising executive powers in a way that contradicts federal authority. Criticism of PDP Leaders Morka also criticized Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governors and leaders, accusing them of ignoring the crisis for months and only speaking out after the federal intervention. He questioned why they failed to address Fubara’s alleged unconstitutional actions earlier. Conclusion The state of emergency in Rivers State continues to generate heated debates over governance, constitutional rights, and federal authority. While the APC insists it was a necessary step to stabilize the state, legal and political opposition remain vocal. The coming months will determine the long-term impact of this unprecedented move. For more on Nigeria’s constitutional provisions on emergency powers, visit Nigerian Law Reform Commission. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Ibas Explains Reason Behind Worika’s Appointment Amid State of Emergency The Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas (retd.) CFR, has officially named Professor Ibibia Lucky Worika as the new Secretary to the State Government (SSG). This announcement was made in a statement issued on Tuesday, March 18, 2025, marking the first major appointment since the declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Why Professor Worika Was Chosen as Rivers State SSG According to the statement, Worika’s selection followed a thorough evaluation of his qualifications, experience, and ability to contribute effectively to the administration’s objectives. “His Excellency, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas, is pleased to appoint Professor Ibibia Lucky Worika as the Secretary to the Rivers State Government. His extensive background in academia, international legal practice, and high-level policy advisory roles makes him the ideal candidate to support this administration in fulfilling the president’s mandate,” the statement read. The appointment is part of ongoing efforts to restore stability, peace, and security in Rivers State, ensuring competent individuals lead critical government functions. Significance of the Appointment & Recent Resignation This strategic decision underscores the administrator’s commitment to leveraging Rivers State’s human capital for effective governance. The sudden resignation of Dr. George Nwaeke, the Head of the Rivers State Civil Service, on Tuesday further highlights the state’s ongoing administrative changes. What This Means for Rivers State Governance With Professor Worika taking on the role of SSG, expectations are high regarding policy implementation, legal governance, and administrative coordination during this transitional period. His expertise is expected to play a pivotal role in the restructuring efforts under the Tinubu-led administration’s intervention in Rivers State. To read more about the state of emergency declared in Rivers State, visit the official Nigerian Government Press Release. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Chijoke Ihunwo, the former Chairman of Obio-Akpor Local Government Area in Rivers State, has strongly criticized President Bola Tinubu’s decision to impose a state of emergency in the region. Ihunwo argued that the declaration was unjustified, emphasizing that Governor Sim Fubara is a man of peace and has no affiliation with militant groups. No Justification for State of Emergency During an interview on Arise TV’s Morning Show, Ihunwo dismissed claims of insecurity or conflict in Rivers State. He stressed that allegations of pipeline vandalism in the state were unfounded, citing statements from the concerned company denying any such incident. “There is no war in Rivers State. The reports about pipeline vandalism are untrue, as the company itself has clarified that no such event took place,” Ihunwo stated. Governor Fubara’s Compliance with Legal Directives Ihunwo further asserted that Governor Fubara has fully complied with the Supreme Court’s ruling and remains committed to upholding the rule of law. “Our governor is a peaceful leader with no ties to militancy. He has strictly followed the Supreme Court’s decision, yet Mr. President has acted in error by declaring a state of emergency in Rivers State,” he added. Rivers State Political Crisis: A Power Struggle The crisis in Rivers State intensified after President Tinubu’s decision to suspend Governor Fubara, the deputy governor, and all state House of Assembly members for six months. The political turmoil stemmed from a rift between former Governor Nyesom Wike and his successor, Fubara. A faction of the Rivers State House of Assembly, led by Martins Amaewhule, initially claimed to have defected from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC). However, the Supreme Court ruled against their defection and reinstated them, directing Governor Fubara to present the 2025 budget. Despite the ruling, Fubara faced resistance when attempting to present the budget, as the faction led by Amaewhule blocked his access to the Assembly complex, escalating the political crisis. Repercussions of Tinubu’s Decision Critics argue that the state of emergency imposed by President Tinubu may set a dangerous precedent for governance in Nigeria. Experts suggest that political conflicts should be resolved through dialogue rather than drastic executive actions. For a deeper analysis of political crises and governance in Nigeria, read this report by Premium Times. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
The Benue Zone B Local Government Election Petition Tribunal has rejected a petition contesting the outcome of a councillorship election, stating that the case falls under pre-election matters and that the petitioner failed to fulfill the mandatory security cost requirement. In its judgment, the tribunal ruled that the petitioner could not prove that the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Benue State had officially submitted his candidacy to the Benue State Independent Electoral Commission (BSIEC). The court dismissed the claim, describing it as an unsubstantiated assumption lacking credible evidence. Furthermore, the panel clarified that the petitioner was not recognized as a candidate in the election since the individual had not completed the required electoral procedures. The ruling emphasized that disputes regarding the dissolution of a party’s executive committee or the nomination of candidates are classified as pre-election issues, which should have been resolved before the polls rather than through a post-election legal challenge. The tribunal also faulted the petitioners for failing to provide substantial proof to back their claims, highlighting that they had simply “dumped their documents” in court without properly defending their case. For further details on electoral petition procedures, visit the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
The National Chairman of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), Shehu Gabam, has issued a strong statement, asserting that the 2027 presidential election is open for any party to win. Gabam emphasized that election victories are not solely determined by individual brilliance or strategic planning but by the will of the people. During an interview on Channels Television, he disclosed that key political figures are defecting to the SDP in large numbers across Nigeria. He also reassured that the party remains open to welcoming more influential personalities. High-Profile Politicians Defecting to SDP According to DAILY POST, former Kaduna State Governor, Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, recently resigned from the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) to join the SDP. Gabam noted that the party has been witnessing a continuous influx of former senators, ministers, and other dignitaries. “We receive decampees into SDP almost every day, covering every state in the federation. Today alone, I welcomed some top figures into my office. If you search online, you will see that over 300 VIPs have submitted resignation letters from their former parties to join us,” Gabam stated. SDP Confident of Victory in 2027 Shehu Gabam made it clear that the SDP’s goal is to take over the Nigerian government in 2027. He stressed that the current administration is failing to address the concerns of citizens, which could lead to their downfall in the next election. “The APC’s mission is to retain power, while the PDP wants to reclaim power. But as SDP, our objective is to form the next government,” Gabam said. He further argued that the Nigerian government lacks effective leadership, and many untapped talents can offer better governance. “No single individual or party has a monopoly on leadership. If there were real efficiency in power, we wouldn’t be seeing repeated governance failures,” he added. Could SDP Emerge as a Strong Alternative? With more influential politicians defecting and growing public dissatisfaction with the APC-led government, political analysts believe that SDP might emerge as a serious contender in the 2027 elections. The coming months will determine whether the party can consolidate its momentum and challenge the dominance of APC and PDP. Read more about Nigeria’s 2027 election landscape on Channels TV READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Key Political Talks on Opposition Alliance Approaching Conclusion Salihu Lukman, the former North-West Vice Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), has disclosed that discussions regarding the formation of a unified opposition coalition to challenge the ruling APC in the 2027 general elections are in their concluding phase. Lukman made this revelation on Monday while responding to Atiku Abubakar’s recent statement, which confirmed that opposition parties are working towards forming a strong alliance against the APC. Opposition Coalition Talks at an Advanced Stage According to Lukman, Abubakar’s statement has fueled a nationwide debate on the prospects of an opposition coalition. He clarified that while no final agreement has been reached, negotiations have progressed significantly. A primary objective of these discussions is securing a collective commitment from opposition leaders to set aside personal political ambitions and focus on a unified strategy for the 2027 elections. Additionally, determining the political party that will serve as the coalition’s main platform remains a key consideration. Challenges and Strategic Decisions Ahead Lukman addressed concerns over internal disagreements, specifically those related to zoning arrangements within the coalition. However, he dismissed reports suggesting that such issues are delaying the process. He emphasized that candidate selection would only be finalized once a consensus is reached on the coalition’s party platform. He further revealed that some coalition members had attempted to register new political parties, but their efforts were blocked by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). Meanwhile, several smaller parties that failed to secure any electoral seats in the last election now face possible de-registration, limiting the coalition’s options. Urgency in Finalizing the Coalition Lukman warned that any further delay in forming the opposition coalition could result in Nigeria evolving into a de facto one-party system, where the ruling APC dominates without strong opposition. He urged political stakeholders and Nigerians to recognize the urgency of the situation, stressing that waiting until 2027 could lead to legal and structural setbacks that weaken the opposition’s chances. For more insights into Nigeria’s evolving political landscape, you can read this analysis on opposition party formations. Council on Foreign Relations – Nigeria’s Political Landscape READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
INEC Receives Petition for the Recall of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has officially received a petition demanding the recall of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan from the Nigerian Senate. The petition, submitted by constituents of Kogi Central, was delivered to INEC’s headquarters in Abuja on Monday, with the commission’s Secretary, Rose Oriaran-Anthony, receiving the document. Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, who represents Kogi Central, is currently under suspension for allegedly violating Senate regulations. Massive Turnout for Petition Signatures According to the petitioners, over 250,000 registered voters out of approximately 480,000 in the senatorial district signed the petition, surpassing the constitutional requirement for a recall process. The document, titled “Constituents’ Petition for the Recall of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan on Grounds of Loss of Confidence,” invokes Section 69 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) and INEC’s Regulations and Guidelines for Recall Petitions. Reasons for the Recall Petition The petition outlines various reasons why the constituents are demanding the senator’s removal. These include: In the petition, signatories emphasize that their collective demand is based on the senator’s failure to uphold the responsibilities expected of her position. They urge INEC to initiate the constitutional process of recall, ultimately leading to the declaration of her seat as vacant. INEC’s Next Steps in the Recall Process Under Nigerian law, once INEC receives a valid recall petition, the commission is required to verify the signatures of registered voters who signed the document. If the petition meets the legal requirements, a referendum will be conducted to determine whether the senator should be recalled. For more details on the recall process, visit INEC’s official guidelines. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
The Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, has called for a posthumous national honor for the late Prof. Humphrey Nwosu, recognizing his pivotal role in shaping Nigeria’s electoral system. Speaking at the INEC headquarters in Abuja, Yakubu paid tribute to Nwosu, who passed away in October 2024, highlighting his immense contributions to the country’s democratic process. Yakubu emphasized that Nwosu, who served as INEC chairman from 1989 to 1993, was instrumental in implementing groundbreaking electoral reforms, including the Option A4 voting system and the Open Ballot System—two innovations that significantly enhanced election credibility. 1993 Election: A Testament to Electoral Integrity Under Nwosu’s leadership, the 1993 presidential election is widely considered one of the most transparent and credible polls in Nigeria’s history. Despite its annulment, historians and political analysts continue to regard it as a landmark moment in Nigeria’s democratic evolution. Yakubu acknowledged that, although the presumed winner of the election, Chief M.K.O. Abiola, was posthumously awarded the Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR) in 2018, the electoral commission and Nwosu himself have not received adequate national recognition for their roles in conducting the election. “The electoral commission, represented by Prof. Humphrey Nwosu, only received a muffled commendation, as though no one conducted that election,” Yakubu remarked. Call for National Recognition Given Nwosu’s legacy in advancing Nigeria’s democratic process, Yakubu urged relevant authorities to officially recognize his contributions through a posthumous national honor. His call aligns with previous advocacy efforts pushing for electoral figures to be recognized for their role in deepening democracy in Nigeria. For further insights into Nigeria’s electoral history and reforms, read this comprehensive analysis by The Electoral Knowledge Network READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
A faction within the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), known as PDP Frontliners, has cautioned that the ongoing internal battle against the party’s National Secretary, Senator Samuel Anyanwu, could significantly weaken the PDP ahead of the 2027 general elections. The group expressed concern that rather than focusing on strengthening the party and preparing for the upcoming elections, internal conflicts and resource-draining battles were taking precedence. They alleged that certain factions within the party, planning to exit and form coalitions, were actively fueling disputes to destabilize the PDP before their departure. In a statement released on Monday, Alhaji Hussein Mohammed (President), Moses Abidemi (Secretary), and Dan Okafor (Publicity Secretary) clarified that the Supreme Court’s ruling had reaffirmed Senator Anyanwu’s legitimacy as PDP National Secretary. They debunked claims suggesting that Hon. Sunday Udeh-Okoye had valid grounds to contest Anyanwu’s position, stating that such narratives were aimed at creating unnecessary confusion within the party. Supreme Court Verdict on Anyanwu’s Leadership The group emphasized that the Supreme Court’s decision invalidated previous judgments from lower courts, which had been used as justification for a meeting of 25 South East PDP stakeholders attempting to replace Senator Anyanwu. The ruling reaffirmed that leadership matters within a political party fall under the party’s internal jurisdiction and cannot be adjudicated by external courts. Furthermore, the PDP Frontliners noted that Senator Anyanwu was not the first member of the PDP National Working Committee to temporarily step aside for state-level elections and return to office. They argued that this precedent had been set in the past and was in accordance with the party’s constitution. Call for Party Unity The group urged party members who were contemplating defection to exit peacefully instead of prolonging internal conflicts that could further destabilize the PDP. They reiterated that Senator Anyanwu has remained loyal to the PDP since 1999 and has never defected to another political party. The Supreme Court, in Appeal No: SC/CV/18/2025, ruled that the case filed by Aniagu Emmanuel at the Enugu State High Court lacked jurisdiction, as it concerned an internal leadership matter within the PDP. The judgment effectively overturned the majority decision of the Court of Appeal and upheld the dissenting ruling by Hon. Justice Ekanem, JCA. For further insights on the Supreme Court ruling, visit the official Nigerian Judiciary website. Conclusion The PDP Frontliners emphasized that any further proxy war against Senator Anyanwu is counterproductive and risks weakening the party ahead of the crucial 2027 general elections. They called on all stakeholders to prioritize party unity and electoral preparedness over internal disputes. By resolving internal conflicts and refocusing efforts on strategic political positioning, the PDP can strengthen its chances of success in 2027. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Former Kaduna Governor Dumps APC, Triggers Mixed Reactions Former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, has officially left the All Progressives Congress (APC) to join the Social Democratic Party (SDP)—a move that has intensified political discussions across Nigeria, particularly in the North. El-Rufai cited dissatisfaction with APC’s governance and a lack of internal democracy as reasons for his defection. However, his decision has sparked a range of reactions from political stakeholders, analysts, and opposition parties. Why Did El-Rufai Leave APC? On March 10, 2025, El-Rufai publicly announced his resignation from the APC, stating that the party had abandoned its founding principles. According to him, the ruling party had become intolerant of internal dissent and had marginalized many of its key members. The former governor also hinted at building a strong opposition coalition by engaging with influential political figures ahead of the 2027 elections. APC Responds to El-Rufai’s Defection The APC leadership dismissed El-Rufai’s exit, calling it an act of political desperation. Felix Morka, the APC National Publicity Secretary, claimed that El-Rufai’s criticisms were driven by personal grievances rather than genuine concerns about governance. Morka suggested that El-Rufai’s dissatisfaction stemmed from his failed attempt to secure a ministerial appointment under President Bola Tinubu’s administration. He argued that the former governor’s defection was not based on ideological differences but rather on personal ambition. Internal Reactions in the SDP While some SDP members see El-Rufai’s entry as a boost to the party’s strength, others fear it could create instability. The SDP Youths and Supporters Coalition rejected his membership, accusing him of being an authoritarian leader who might undermine the party’s democratic structure. Additionally, Adewole Adebayo, the SDP’s 2023 presidential candidate, acknowledged El-Rufai’s political experience but raised concerns about his controversial leadership style. Criticisms From the Opposition Several political figures have criticized El-Rufai’s defection, claiming that his decision is more about political survival than genuine interest in national progress. Adnan Mukhtar Tudunwada, a former PDP state assembly aspirant, stated that El-Rufai only left APC because he had lost influence within the party. “El-Rufai did not join SDP to serve the people—he joined because he saw no future for himself in APC. He previously insisted that power must shift to the South, despite no constitutional backing for such a stance. If President Tinubu had given him a ministerial position, would he have rejected it?” Tudunwada questioned in an interview with LMSINT MEDIA. He further alleged that El-Rufai’s alliance-building efforts were more about personal gain than establishing a credible opposition. “I support a strong opposition coalition, but not the kind where everyone is rallying behind a single individual who only seeks political dominance,” he added. New Political Realignments Underway? El-Rufai’s defection has fueled speculations of a political shift in Nigeria. The SDP National Chairman, Shehu Musa Gabam, suggested that more prominent figures might soon exit APC. Among the names circulating are former Ekiti State Governor Kayode Fayemi and former Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola—though Fayemi has denied any plans to leave. Concerns From Political Allies Even among his close allies, some believe that El-Rufai’s decision to leave APC was premature. Salihu Lukman, a former APC National Vice-Chairman (North West) and longtime associate of El-Rufai, argued that his defection could weaken efforts to build a united opposition front before the 2027 elections. Lukman advised that El-Rufai should have exercised patience before making such a drastic move. Conclusion: What’s Next for El-Rufai? El-Rufai’s defection to SDP remains one of the most debated political moves in Nigeria’s evolving landscape. While he presents himself as a leader championing opposition unity, critics argue that his decision is driven by political ambition rather than true democratic principles. As the 2027 elections approach, the impact of his defection on Nigeria’s political realignments will become clearer. However, whether it strengthens the opposition or merely serves his personal interests remains uncertain. Premium Times READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Senators Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and Sunday Karimi Clash Over Suspension Controversy Suspended Kogi Central Senator, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, and Kogi West Senator, Sunday Karimi, engaged in a heated war of words over her recent suspension from the Nigerian Senate. The dispute escalated as Karimi defended the decision, arguing that her conduct in the Senate justified the disciplinary action. Karimi, a member of the All Progressives Congress (APC), insisted that Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension was necessary due to the controversy surrounding her actions, which he claimed had embarrassed Kogi State. He further suggested that former Governor Yahaya Bello had foreseen this issue, reinforcing concerns about her suitability for the Red Chamber. “All our advice to her fell on deaf ears. One cannot ignore the fact that Yahaya Bello saw this coming,” Karimi stated while addressing journalists. The senator further alleged that Akpoti-Uduaghan had tarnished Kogi State’s reputation and that her actions had contributed to a negative perception of the state across the country. Akpoti-Uduaghan Fires Back, Calls for Senate Drug Tests Reacting to Karimi’s remarks, Akpoti-Uduaghan dismissed his claims, stating that personal interests were influencing Senate decisions. She went further to propose periodic drug testing for senators, arguing that such measures would enhance rational decision-making within the legislature. “The NDLEA needs to conduct periodic tests on senators. That singular process will save the parliament from erratic legislative hallucinations,” she remarked through her media aide, Israel Arogbonlo. Akpoti-Uduaghan referenced previous calls by NDLEA Chairman, Brig. Gen. Buba Marwa, for political aspirants to undergo drug screenings, emphasizing that similar tests had already been conducted for local government candidates in Kano State. She asserted that extending this policy to senators would help safeguard the integrity of legislative proceedings and ensure effective governance. Political Fallout and Implications The suspension of Akpoti-Uduaghan followed a confrontation with Senate President Godswill Akpabio, an incident that has ignited political tensions in Kogi State and beyond. The controversy has further deepened divisions within the Senate, with some lawmakers supporting disciplinary measures while others call for a review of the decision. For a broader perspective on Nigeria’s legislative reforms and governance integrity, read this analysis on legislative accountability by a leading political affairs expert. Conclusion The Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan suspension controversy underscores the ongoing political power struggle within the Nigerian Senate. While Karimi defends the disciplinary action as a necessary move to uphold legislative standards, Akpoti-Uduaghan insists that Senate reforms—including mandatory drug testing—are crucial for maintaining integrity in governance. As debates over the incident continue, Nigerians closely watch how this clash will shape the political landscape and the future of legislative conduct in the country. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
NBA Calls for Governor Fubara’s Reinstatement, Labels His Removal Unconstitutional The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has once again urged President Bola Tinubu to immediately reinstate Governor Siminalayi Fubara as the legitimate leader of Rivers State. The association maintains that Fubara’s removal is a violation of the Nigerian Constitution. Tinubu’s Declaration Sparks Controversy Last Tuesday, President Tinubu declared a state of emergency in Rivers State, followed by the controversial suspension of the governor, his deputy, and all House of Assembly members due to the ongoing political unrest in the oil-rich region. In an unprecedented move, Ibok-Ete Ibas, a retired naval chief, was appointed as the sole administrator of the state, a decision widely criticized as unconstitutional. The NBA swiftly responded, asserting that the President lacks the legal authority to suspend democratically elected officials. NBA: Constitution Does Not Recognize a Sole Administrator Speaking on Channels Television’s Sunday Politics, Afam Osigwe, the NBA President, reinforced the association’s stance, emphasizing that Fubara must be restored to office. “The Constitution does not recognize a sole administrator. We expect the President to restore Fubara back to power, as his removal was unconstitutional,” Osigwe stated. Osigwe also questioned the legitimacy of the newly appointed sole administrator, arguing that the oath of office taken by Ibok-Ete Ibas has no constitutional basis. Legal Experts Condemn Tinubu’s Actions as Excessive and Undemocratic The NBA president further criticized the measures taken to resolve the Rivers State crisis, describing them as overreaching, excessive, undemocratic, and unconstitutional. He likened the approach to using a sledgehammer for a headache, stating that the political crisis requires a political solution rather than forceful intervention. Additionally, Osigwe dismissed the National Assembly’s approval of the President’s actions, arguing that it does not provide legal justification. “The National Assembly’s approval is like placing something on nothing. It does not legitimize the President’s decision,” he added. Conclusion: A Call for Constitutional Adherence As tensions continue to escalate in Rivers State, legal experts and political analysts are closely monitoring the situation. The NBA’s firm stance highlights the growing concerns over executive overreach and the need to uphold constitutional democracy. For further insights on the legal implications of state emergencies and governance in Nigeria, visit the Constitutional Rights Project. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
