Running Mate Controversy: Fresh Clash Between Atiku and Wike’s Camps Over Okowa’s Selection

The Renewed Controversy Over PDP’s Running Mate Choice The debate over the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) running mate selection during the 2023 presidential election has resurfaced. A report recently brought to light suggests that the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, was initially favored over Ifeanyi Okowa, a claim that contradicts former PDP presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar’s previous statements. Leaked Report Reignites Political Tensions The controversy was reignited by Mr. Lere Olayinka, an aide to Nyesom Wike. The PDP committee’s report, signed by former National Chairman Iyorchia Ayu and other key leaders, was dated June 14, 2022, and reportedly sighted by LMSINT MEDIA. The report, titled “Report of the Advisory Committee for the Selection of Presidential Running Mate,” indicated the following preference order: The committee’s decision was based on the broader interests of the party. The report was signed by notable PDP figures, including Umar I. Damagun, Aminu Waziri Tambuwal, Bala Mohammed, Olusegun Mimiko, and David Mark. Atiku’s Claim vs. Wike’s Camp Response Atiku Abubakar, in an interview with Adesuwa Giwa-Osagie, claimed that the committee ranked Okowa as the top choice, with Wike coming second and Udom Emmanuel third. He defended his decision to pick Okowa based on the committee’s recommendation. However, Wike’s Senior Special Assistant on Public Communications and Social Media, Lere Olayinka, accused Atiku of distorting facts. He urged the former Vice President to seek forgiveness, stating: “Someone needs to show this to Atiku so that he can seek forgiveness before Ramadan ends.” Olayinka further alleged that Atiku misrepresented the committee’s findings to justify his choice of Okowa. Atiku’s Camp Responds to Allegations Atiku’s media team dismissed Olayinka’s statements as an “emotional outburst” and reaffirmed that Okowa’s selection was based on intellect, composure, and statesmanship rather than party politics. In a statement, Atiku’s media office emphasized: “While we understand that bitterness often finds expression in misplaced aggression, we must remind Wike and his team that a bitter heart isn’t capable of charity, nor does it inspire unity, healing, or truth.” They reiterated that Atiku had no apologies for choosing Okowa over Wike, as the decision aligned with his vision for national leadership. Internal Party Division and Political Fallout The renewed controversy reflects the ongoing internal tensions within the PDP. While Wike’s faction insists on the validity of the leaked committee report, Atiku’s supporters maintain that his choice was the right decision for the party and the nation. This division highlights broader challenges within the PDP as it seeks to rebuild its political strategy ahead of future elections. Conclusion The verbal war between Atiku and Wike’s camps over Okowa’s selection as PDP’s running mate in 2023 underscores lingering political rivalries. As the PDP navigates these internal disputes, the party’s ability to unite and strategize for upcoming elections remains a critical concern. For further insights into Nigeria’s political landscape, check out our in-depth analysis on Nigerian Political Party Leadership and Election Strategy and Political Alliances. ThisDay Live’s analysis on PDP’s internal conflicts READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel

Kano Deputy Governor Under Fire Over Alleged Derogatory Remarks

Kano Deputy Governor Criticized for Alleged Disrespectful Comments The Women Lawyers Congress has urged Kano State Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf to address and clarify alleged derogatory remarks made by his Deputy Governor, Aminu Abdussalam. The controversy stems from a viral video in which Abdussalam reportedly made offensive comments about ‘Gwaggo,’ a term referring to former First Lady Hafsat Abdullahi Ganduje. Women Lawyers Congress Demands Accountability In a statement released on Tuesday, Barrister Nafisa Abba Ismail, Chairlady of the Women Lawyers Congress, condemned the Deputy Governor’s remarks, calling them part of a worrying trend of disrespecting respected figures. “Such conduct is unbecoming of a leader. Leadership requires ethical standards and respect for all, especially women in governance,” she stated. Call for Public Clarification and Apology The Congress has requested Governor Yusuf to publicly clarify that the remarks were not directed at Professor Hafsat Umar Ganduje. If they were, the Deputy Governor is expected to issue a formal apology to both Professor Ganduje and the people of Kano. Barrister Nafisa stressed that this issue is beyond personal disputes, as it pertains to principles of dignity and women’s representation in leadership roles. She further warned that if such behavior continues, legal action will be taken against the Deputy Governor. The Importance of Respect in Leadership The statement also highlighted the responsibility of public figures in maintaining decorum and urged immediate measures to prevent leaders from setting negative precedents. “Public officials should use their influence to promote inclusivity and respect, not undermine women in governance,” the Congress emphasized. Conclusion As the controversy unfolds, the Women Lawyers Congress stands firm in advocating for accountability and respect for women in leadership. The ball is now in the Governor’s court to address the issue and ensure ethical governance in Kano State. Read more on ethical governance and leadership standards READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel

SDP Rejects Political Merger and Hostile Takeover – National Secretary

The Social Democratic Party (SDP) has reaffirmed its independence, stating that it is not open to merging with any other political party. The party’s National Secretary, Olu Agunloye, made this declaration in an official statement, highlighting that any attempt at a hostile takeover by new members would be resisted. New Members Must Follow Party Principles Amid recent reports of defections from the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to SDP, Agunloye stressed that while new members are welcome, they must strictly adhere to the party’s constitution and principles. “APC and PDP have governed Nigeria since 1999, yet the nation is far from meeting citizens’ expectations. Injustice, corruption, vote-buying, and insecurity have fueled economic hardship, high youth unemployment, and widespread poverty,” Agunloye noted. He emphasized that SDP stands as an alternative platform for progress, urging party leaders and state chairmen to mobilize citizens committed to good governance. He called for collective action rather than leaving the responsibility solely to the National Chairman, Alhaji Shehu Gabam. SDP’s Commitment to Political Ideology Unlike some parties driven by personal interests, SDP upholds a strong ideological foundation, Agunloye affirmed. He assured members that the party remains guided by its vision for governance, justice, and equitable development. To avoid the pitfalls that led to past failed alliances, SDP will carefully manage internal conflicts while reinforcing its party structures. The party is also focused on strengthening: SDP’s Political Future and Strong Identity As the 2027 general elections approach, SDP continues to position itself as a credible alternative to the dominant political parties. With a growing membership base and a clear governance agenda, the party aims to restore trust in political leadership through transparency and grassroots engagement. For further insights into Nigeria’s evolving political landscape, read more on The Guardian Nigeria. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel

Rep. Aminu Jaji Warns Northwest APC Against Dragging Senator Yari into Political Disputes

Hon. Aminu Jaji Condemns False Allegations, Reaffirms Loyalty to APC Hon. Aminu Sani Jaji, a respected member of the House of Representatives, has issued a strong warning to the Committee of Concerned Elders for Peace within the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the North-West region. He cautioned against implicating Senator Abdulaziz Yari or any other party leader in fabricated political schemes. In a statement released by his media aide, Mohammed Umar, Jaji dismissed allegations of anti-party activities, emphasizing his unwavering loyalty to APC and its leadership. “I have always maintained my respect for Senator Abdulaziz Yari—he is my mentor. I worked under his leadership and hold him in high esteem. Under no circumstances would I ever attempt to undermine his position,” Jaji affirmed. The lawmaker, representing Kaura Namoda/Birnin Magaji Federal Constituency of Zamfara State, clarified that the accusations were baseless attempts by individuals seeking to destabilize the party. Rejecting Falsehoods and Political Manipulation Jaji reiterated that he has never engaged in any form of anti-party activity or disrespected any APC leader. His loyalty to the party remains steadfast, irrespective of internal political dynamics. “The bond between me and Sen. Abdulaziz Yari is built on mutual respect and years of collaboration. No amount of political maneuvering can alter this relationship,” he stated. He further alleged that individuals who have lost political influence in Zamfara State are orchestrating these false claims to undermine his growing popularity. Call for Focus on Governance, Not Political Attacks Jaji urged those spreading misinformation to refrain from dragging Senator Yari into their personal political agendas. Instead, he advised them to allow the former Zamfara governor to concentrate on his responsibilities in delivering good governance to the people of Zamfara State. For a detailed analysis of political conflicts within APC, check out this insightful report on party leadership dynamics. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel

2027: Tinubu’s Supporters Criticize Atiku’s Opposition Coalition as a Threat to Nigeria’s Progress

Supporters of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, operating under the umbrella of the National Coalition for Asiwaju Mandate (NCAM), have strongly opposed the recent political alliance spearheaded by Atiku Abubakar and other prominent opposition figures. Atiku Announces Coalition to Challenge Tinubu in 2027 According to Daily Post, Atiku Abubakar, the 2023 presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), officially launched an opposition coalition on March 20, 2025. The announcement was made during a press conference addressing what opposition leaders described as the unconstitutional declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State. The coalition comprises major political figures, including: NCAM Labels the Opposition Coalition a “Selfish Political Agenda” In response, the National President of NCAM, Isaac Ikpa, released a statement in Abuja, condemning the coalition as an alliance of “expired politicians” who are more concerned with personal ambition than national development. According to Ikpa, the opposition figures in the coalition have a track record of failed leadership, corruption, and divisive politics, making them unfit to dictate Nigeria’s future. “This so-called coalition is merely a gathering of politicians seeking relevance. It is a laughable attempt by individuals who have repeatedly failed Nigerians to reclaim lost political influence,” Ikpa stated. Tinubu’s Supporters Defend His Leadership and Renewed Hope Agenda NCAM emphasized that President Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda is delivering on its promises and that Nigerians must resist attempts by opposition politicians to derail the country’s progress. “These individuals have no vision, no credibility, and no track record of good governance. Their coalition is built on hypocrisy, deceit, and personal ambition, rather than a sincere concern for the Nigerian people.” The group urged citizens to reject what they described as a desperate move by opposition leaders to regain power at the expense of Nigeria’s stability. “We must not allow these individuals to drag Nigeria backward. The future of our nation is at stake, and we must stand firm in defending good governance and transformative leadership,” Ikpa concluded. For further details on the state of emergency controversy in Rivers State, refer to The Guardian Nigeria. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel Kindly Share:

Osun LG Election Verdict Sparks Intense Clash Between APC and PDP

Political Tensions Escalate Over Local Government Leadership in Osun The ongoing political standoff in Osun State has intensified as the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) remain at odds over the Court of Appeal’s ruling on local government elections. APC Demands Recognition of Reinstated Chairmen The APC has accused Governor Ademola Adeleke of misrepresenting the court verdict, urging him to publicly acknowledge the reinstatement of its council chairmen and councillors. According to the party, the Attorney-General of the Federation confirmed the legal authority of the reinstated officials over the local governments. In a statement issued on Thursday, the party’s Director of Media and Information, Kola Olabisi, called on Adeleke to halt any obstruction of local government administration. The APC maintains that the Court of Appeal’s decision on 10 February 2025 legally restored its members to office. The party further alleged that Governor Adeleke ignored legal counsel and proceeded with the 22 February 2025 local government elections despite no legitimate vacancies existing at the time. It also claimed that Adeleke’s representatives held discussions with the Attorney-General concerning the ruling, emphasizing that the governor’s administration was unlawfully managing local government allocations. The APC warned that continued interference would amount to a violation of the rule of law. PDP Denies APC’s Claims, Defends February Elections On the other hand, the Osun PDP has rejected the APC’s assertions, arguing that no court ruling reinstated the dismissed officials. In a statement signed by Osun PDP Chairman, Sunday Bisi, the party accused the APC of spreading misinformation to mislead the public and undermine judicial integrity. The PDP questioned why the APC submitted a fresh application at the Court of Appeal if its officials had already been reinstated. The party reaffirmed that the judgement nullifying the October 2022 elections remains valid. Furthermore, the PDP criticized the APC for allegedly twisting the stance of the Attorney-General of the Federation. According to the PDP, the legal documents submitted to the Attorney-General clearly justified the February 2025 local government elections conducted by the Osun State Independent Electoral Commission (OSSIEC). The party condemned the APC for what it described as an attempt to forcefully seize power through unconstitutional means. The PDP warned that such political maneuvers pose a serious threat to democracy and urged the public to resist any illegitimate takeover of power. Osun Political Battle: What Happens Next? As tensions continue to rise, both parties remain steadfast in their legal positions. While the APC insists that its chairmen and councillors should be recognized, the PDP maintains that the court invalidated their election results. Observers anticipate that this legal and political struggle may have significant implications for the governance and administration of local councils in Osun State. For more updates on Osun politics, visit Premium Times. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel

El-Rufai’s Defection to SDP a Political Misstep – APC Woman Leader Declares

APC Woman Leader Rejects El-Rufai’s SDP Move, Calls It a Wrong Political Strategy Hajiya Maryam Suleiman, the Kaduna State Woman Leader of the All Progressives Congress (APC), has openly criticized former Governor Nasir El-Rufai over his defection to the Social Democratic Party (SDP). She described his political switch as a miscalculated move that holds no strategic advantage. Once a devoted supporter of El-Rufai, Suleiman has now reaffirmed her commitment to the APC and Governor Uba Sani’s leadership. She admitted to previously opposing the governor due to misinformation and has since publicly apologized for her past criticisms. “Governor Uba Sani is a leader with compassion and a vision for true development, unlike El-Rufai, whose tenure saw market demolitions and mass teacher dismissals that affected thousands of lives,” she stated. A Shift in Kaduna’s Political Landscape Suleiman has also rebranded her political identity, transitioning from “Maryam Mai Rusau” (a known El-Rufai loyalist) to “Maryam Mai Ginau”, a name symbolizing her commitment to progress and Governor Uba Sani’s developmental agenda. Her defection from El-Rufai’s camp signals a significant political realignment in Kaduna State, as the APC strengthens its influence while SDP struggles to gain traction. For more insights on Nigeria’s political dynamics, visit The Guardian Nigeria. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel

Wike Will Ensure Atiku Faces Another Political Defeat – Lere Olayinka

Lere Olayinka Criticizes Atiku Over 2023 Election Loss, Says Wike Will Continue to Oppose Him Atiku’s Decision on Running Mate Sparks New Controversy Lere Olayinka, an aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), has strongly responded to former Vice President Atiku Abubakar regarding his recent statement on why he did not select Nyesom Wike as his running mate for the 2023 presidential election. Atiku, who contested under the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), recently reaffirmed that he had no regrets about his decision to overlook Wike, the former governor of Rivers State. However, Olayinka was quick to dismiss Atiku’s explanation, arguing that his decision was a key factor in the PDP’s defeat in 2023. Olayinka: Wike Will Continue to Oppose Atiku Reacting in a Twitter post, Olayinka criticized Atiku for justifying his choice two years after the election loss. He insisted that Wike had no regrets about opposing Atiku’s presidential ambition and would continue to be a strong obstacle to his political future. “Two years after making the PDP lose a presidential election it could have won, Atiku is now explaining why he didn’t pick Wike as his running mate. He says he has no regrets, but Wike also has no regrets for ensuring that Atiku lost—and he will make sure Atiku fails again and again,” Olayinka remarked. The Atiku-Wike Rift and PDP’s Internal Crisis The ongoing feud between Atiku and Wike has deepened the internal crisis within the PDP. Wike, who led the G5 governors in resisting Atiku’s candidacy, played a significant role in weakening the party’s chances in the 2023 general elections. His opposition contributed to the internal divisions that cost the PDP a potential victory. Political analysts believe that unless the party resolves its internal conflicts, future elections may yield similar outcomes. Meanwhile, Atiku remains a persistent contender, having run for president multiple times without success. For more on the political tensions within the Peoples Democratic Party, visit Vanguard for in-depth analysis. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel

Shehu Yar’Adua Urged Me to Step Down for MKO Abiola – Atiku Reveals Details of SDP Primaries

Atiku: Shehu Yar’Adua Asked Me to Step Down for MKO Abiola at SDP Primaries Former Vice President and ex-presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar, has disclosed that his late political mentor, Shehu Musa Yar’Adua, directed him to withdraw from the 1993 Social Democratic Party (SDP) primaries in favor of MKO Abiola. Atiku shared this revelation during an interview with Adesuwa Giwa-Osagie of Untold Stories, where he provided insights into the political dynamics that shaped that historic moment. Why Atiku Stepped Down for MKO Abiola Atiku explained that the instruction to step down came after Yar’Adua’s private meeting with MKO Abiola in Jos. He narrated how he urged Abiola to arrive in Jos in time for the primaries, fearing that if he didn’t, Babagana Kingibe could emerge as the party’s flagbearer. “I told him, ‘If you don’t come to Jos, there’s a strong chance Kingibe will be elected, and I know you wouldn’t want that. So, you better come, no matter how late.’” According to Atiku, Yar’Adua later held a closed-door discussion with Abiola, after which he instructed him to step down. “When we got to the meeting in Ambassador Kwande’s house, all Yar’Adua told me was, ‘Turaki.’ I said, ‘Yes, sir.’ He said, ‘Step down for MKO Abiola.’ And I responded, ‘Okay, sir. I have stepped down.’” Governors Opposed Atiku as MKO Abiola’s Running Mate Atiku also revealed that SDP governors resisted the idea of him being chosen as Abiola’s running mate. They reportedly threatened to withdraw support if he was selected over Babagana Kingibe. IBB’s Regret Over the Annulment of June 12 Election Despite MKO Abiola’s victory at the polls, the election was annulled by the military regime of General Ibrahim Babangida (IBB). This controversial decision sparked national outrage and is still regarded as a dark moment in Nigeria’s political history. However, in February 2025, IBB publicly expressed regret over his decision to nullify the results. In an interview, he admitted that the election was free, fair, and credible but justified his actions as being influenced by political pressure at the time. Conclusion Atiku Abubakar’s revelation sheds light on the internal political strategies within the SDP in 1993 and the role of Shehu Yar’Adua in shaping Nigeria’s democratic history. His withdrawal from the race ultimately paved the way for MKO Abiola’s emergence as the SDP presidential candidate. For a deeper analysis of Nigeria’s political history, check out this BBC News report on June 12 democracy struggles: BBC News – Nigeria’s 1993 Election. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel

Abaribe and Opeyemi Clash in Senate Over Legislative Order

Abaribe Challenges Legislative Procedure in Senate Debate Abia South Senator, Eyinnaya Abaribe, asserted on Wednesday that Nigeria is not under dictatorship, following a heated exchange with Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, over a proposed bill. During the Senate session, Abaribe sought to introduce a bill advocating for the immortalization of Humphrey Nwosu and recognition of June 12. However, Bamidele objected, citing Order 38 as grounds for dismissal. Disagreeing with this ruling, Abaribe argued that senators should have the freedom to make personal explanations on their motions. In his words: “Even if the Senate Leader says that it doesn’t follow, the fact remains that a senator who wishes to make a personal explanation must be allowed to do so. We are not under a dictatorship.” Senate Leadership Responds to Abaribe’s Claim Deputy Senate President, Barau Jibrin, weighed in on the debate, emphasizing adherence to parliamentary rules. He pointed out inconsistencies in Abaribe’s approach, explaining that: “We agreed that Abaribe would bring this motion under Order 41 and 51, but later he attempted to reintroduce it under Order 52. Such a shift contradicts our agreed procedure.” Jibrin reaffirmed the need for transparency in legislative decisions, dismissing any claims of procedural bias. What This Means for Nigeria’s Legislative Process The exchange between Abaribe and Bamidele highlights the ongoing debate over parliamentary procedures and whether they uphold democratic values. With concerns about legislative freedom and procedural constraints, the Senate must strike a balance between order and open discourse. For more insights into Nigeria’s legislative framework, read this analysis on Senate rules and democracy. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel

Why Atiku Abubakar Didn’t Choose Wike as His Running Mate – Full Disclosure

Atiku Reveals Why He Passed Over Wike for 2023 Vice Presidential Slot Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has shed light on the reasons behind his decision to overlook Nyesom Wike, the former Governor of Rivers State, as his running mate for the 2023 presidential election under the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). LMSINT MEDIA recalls that Wike lost the PDP presidential primaries to Atiku, and many political analysts speculated that he would be selected as the vice-presidential candidate. However, Atiku ultimately chose Ifeanyi Okowa, the former Governor of Delta State, instead. The Decision That Sparked Political Tensions Atiku’s choice of Okowa over Wike reportedly fueled the ongoing political rift between the two politicians. Wike, who currently serves as the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), was seen by many PDP stakeholders as a strong contender for the vice-presidential slot. In an exclusive interview for the television program “Untold Stories” with journalist Adesuwa Giwa-Osagie, Atiku addressed the controversy surrounding his selection process. The interview, scheduled to air today, delves into his approach to choosing a running mate. Why Atiku Chose Okowa Over Wike Recalling the 2019 election, Atiku stated that he faced criticism for picking Peter Obi as his running mate without extensive consultation within the party. Learning from that experience, he decided to involve the PDP leadership in the 2023 selection process. “They said I did not consult with the party enough. So in 2023, I threw the whole thing to the party. I said, ‘Okay, set up a committee and recommend three people for me to pick as a running mate,’” Atiku explained. According to him, the PDP committee presented three names: Atiku emphasized that his decision was purely based on the committee’s ranking, stating: “So I picked number one.” No Regrets Over His Decision Despite the political fallout from his choice, Atiku remains firm in his stance. When asked if he had any regrets about not selecting Wike, he responded: “No, not at all.” For more insights into Nigeria’s political landscape, visit Premium Times – a trusted source for political analysis and updates. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel

Akpabio vs Natasha: Senate Hearing Erupts in Chaos as Nwaebonyi, Ezekwesili Engage in Heated Clash

A dramatic confrontation unfolded during a Senate committee hearing on ethics, privileges, and public petitions as Senator Onyekachi Nwaebonyi of Ebonyi North clashed with former Minister of Education, Oby Ezekwesili. Tensions Rise Over Petition Against Senate President Akpabio The session, held on Tuesday, focused on a fresh petition filed by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan against Senate President Godswill Akpabio. Attendees included Ezekwesili, legal representative Abiola Akiode, and petitioner Zubairu Yakubu. Clash Erupts During Proceedings The altercation began when Yakubu attempted to speak while committee chairman Neda Imaseun was addressing the panel. Ordered to mute his microphone, Yakubu’s interruption prompted Ezekwesili to step in. However, Nwaebonyi, present as a witness for Akpabio, intervened, triggering a fiery exchange. Adjournment Following Heated Exchange After order was restored, Chairman Imaseun clarified that the matter was already before a court, leading to an abrupt adjournment of the hearing. Read more on credible Nigerian political updates? READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel

Emergency Rule in Rivers: Afenifere Accuses Tinubu, NASS of Violating the 1999 Constitution

Afenifere Condemns Emergency Rule in Rivers State ABEOKUTA – The Pan-Yoruba socio-political group, Afenifere, has strongly criticized the National Assembly for supporting President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State. The group asserted that this decision violates the principles of democracy and undermines the 1999 Constitution. Following its National Caucus meeting held at the residence of its late former leader, Pa Ayo Adebanjo in Isanya Ogbo, Ogun State, Afenifere issued a communiqué condemning the move. The statement, signed by the group’s Leader, Oba Oladipo Olaitan, and its National Publicity Secretary, Prince Justice Faloye, described the action as detrimental to Nigeria’s democratic framework. Afenifere’s Stance on National Assembly’s Role Afenifere expressed disappointment in the 10th National Assembly for failing to uphold the democratic rights of Nigerians. The group emphasized that the Constitution requires a two-thirds majority approval from lawmakers before implementing such a critical decision. Instead, they accused the legislators of employing voice votes to bypass constitutional provisions, calling it an unconstitutional and undemocratic approach. The statement read: “The lack of transparency in the legislative process regarding Rivers State’s emergency rule sets a dangerous precedent. The decision disregards constitutional safeguards, weakening the principles of democracy and federalism.” Call for Legislative Accountability The group further demanded that the current leadership of the National Assembly step down, citing a crisis of integrity and failure to uphold the separation of powers. Afenifere warned that continued disregard for constitutional processes could lead to authoritarian rule, comparing the situation to Hitler’s rise in Germany, where democracy was systematically dismantled. Additionally, Afenifere criticized the recent vote of confidence in Senate President Godswill Akpabio, stating that it reflects an internal crisis of trust within the Senate. A Call to Defend Nigerian Democracy Urging Nigerians to resist actions that threaten democratic stability, Afenifere called on all citizens to demand adherence to the rule of law and prevent the erosion of democracy in Nigeria. The group warned that failure to act now could lead to further political instability and authoritarian governance. For further insights into constitutional law and democratic governance, read more on The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel