U.S. President Donald Trump addressed reporters regarding a recent US strike on a site reportedly linked to Venezuelan drug trafficking activities. During a press briefing, Trump stated that the United States carried out an operation targeting a “dock area” where, according to him, illicit drug shipments are loaded onto boats. The president confirmed that the strike resulted in a “major explosion,” but he did not provide the exact location of the dock. As of now, the Venezuelan government has not issued any official statement regarding the incident. Details on the Drone Strike Multiple media outlets, including CNN and The New York Times, reported, citing anonymous sources close to the matter, that the explosion was caused by a CIA-operated drone strike. If verified, this would mark the first publicly known US military operation conducted inside Venezuelan territory. Since September, the United States has intensified operations targeting alleged drug-smuggling vessels in the Pacific and Caribbean regions, reportedly striking over 20 boats and resulting in at least 100 casualties. The latest strike occurred on Monday, with the US Southern Command posting on social media that two individuals labeled as “narco-terrorists” were killed in a “lethal kinetic strike” in the eastern Pacific. Trump’s Approach Toward Venezuela President Trump has consistently maintained a hardline stance on Venezuela, previously threatening land strikes and authorizing covert operations by the CIA against the regime of President Nicolás Maduro. When asked about the CIA’s involvement in the recent attack, Trump responded: “I don’t want to say that. I know exactly who it was, but I don’t want to say who it was.” He further explained: “We hit all the boats, and now we hit the area… it’s the implementation area. That’s where they implement, and that is no longer around.” This marks the second time Trump has publicly referenced the strike on the dock facility. Last week, in a radio interview, he spoke about an operation targeting a “big facility” but provided minimal details. Official Statements and Confirmation The Pentagon has directed questions regarding the operation to the White House, which has not yet released a formal statement. In previous operations targeting drug trafficking vessels, the Pentagon shared images and videos via social media to confirm the strikes. So far, there are no publicly available visuals or confirmations regarding the dock incident. The escalation underscores the US administration’s continued efforts to curb drug trafficking from Venezuela, highlighting both the covert and overt strategies employed.
Osogbo, Abeokuta, Akure – Governor Ademola Adeleke of Osun State, yesterday, officially signed the state’s 2026 appropriation bill totaling N705 billion into law, pledging to ensure its full implementation across all sectors. The signing ceremony, held at the Governor’s Office in Abere, Osogbo, was attended by Deputy Governor Kola Adewusi, Speaker of the Osun State House of Assembly Adewale Egbedun, Chief of Staff Kazeem Akinleye, Head of Service Ayanleye Aina, and members of the state cabinet. According to a statement by the governor’s spokesperson, Olawale Rasheed, Adeleke emphasized that the signing of the 2026 appropriation bill is aimed at consolidating governance achievements and expanding service delivery in line with his administration’s five-point agenda. The governor highlighted that this marks the beginning of “the final year of our first term, with heightened ambitions to complete ongoing projects and initiate new development programs for the welfare of Osun residents.” He reaffirmed that the administration’s performance continues to gain widespread public recognition. Ondo State Budget 2026: Budget of Economic Consolidation Signed into Law In a parallel development, Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa of Ondo State has given his assent to the 2026 Appropriation Bill, titled the “Budget of Economic Consolidation”, amounting to N524,410,590,939. The budget comprises N220,830,941,200 for recurrent expenditure and N303,579,649,739 for capital expenditure, with key allocations focused on infrastructure, health, and education. Governor Aiyedatiwa, speaking at the Executive Council Chamber of the Governor’s Office in Akure, described the budget as a strategic blueprint designed to address prevailing national economic realities. He detailed the sectoral allocations, which include: Aiyedatiwa urged all ministries, extra-ministerial departments, and agencies to strictly align their programs with the budget provisions, ensuring timely, prudent, and efficient execution of projects. He reiterated that the budget is a covenant between the government and the citizens, symbolizing responsible governance and shared prosperity. The governor also commended the Ondo State House of Assembly for their meticulous and prompt consideration of the 2026 Appropriation Bill, noting that their collaboration demonstrates a strong partnership in the service of the people. Earlier, Speaker Olamide Oladiji praised Aiyedatiwa for transforming Akure into a modern capital with enhanced urban infrastructure. Ogun State Approves N1.668 Trillion 2026 Budget Meanwhile, the Ogun State House of Assembly, yesterday, passed the 2026 Appropriation Bill valued at N1,668,997,993,125.44, presented by Governor Dapo Abiodun. The process followed the report of the House Committee on Finance and Appropriation, presented by its chairman, Musefiu Lamidi. The adoption of the bill was moved by Lamidi, seconded by Folawewo Salami, and supported by the entire House through a voice vote during a plenary session presided over by Speaker Oludaisi Elemide at the Assembly Complex in Abeokuta. The bill was read and adopted clause by clause before the Committee of the Whole House, and the motion for the third reading was successfully carried by Majority Leader Yusuf Sheriff, seconded by Minority Leader Lukman Adeleye, and unanimously approved by all lawmakers. Clerk/Head of the Legislative Service, Mr. Sakiru Adebakin, oversaw the third reading, after which the Speaker instructed that the final copy be transmitted to the governor for assent. During the presentation of the bill titled “H.B. No. 028/OG/2025 – Year 2026 Appropriation Bill”, Lamidi explained that the Assembly made adjustments to the budgets of three ministries, departments, and agencies (MDAs). This led to a slight upward revision of the Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) by N2.193 billion, offset by reductions in capital receipts, while maintaining the total actual expenditure at N1.668 trillion as initially proposed by the governor. Previously, the Ogun Assembly had passed the Year 2025 Revised Appropriation Bill and the Revised Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) for 2026–2028, reflecting the state’s commitment to prudent fiscal management and strategic development planning.
Kindly Share:
As Nigeria prepares for the implementation of new tax reforms on January 1, 2026, the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) has pledged to oppose any tax framework it deems unjust, biased, or misleading. The labour body has warned that workers will resist policies that exclude their input during the formulation and enactment of tax laws. The NLC emphasized that a tax system that fails to involve workers in decision-making processes is inherently inequitable and risks aggravating social inequality and unrest. Speaking on the upcoming reforms, NLC President, Joe Ajaero, urged the Federal Government to avoid rushing into the enforcement of tax laws that appear politically manipulated or technically flawed, advocating instead for a transparent and consultative approach that includes all stakeholders. “It is far better to patiently design tax policies that are co-created and embraced by all stakeholders than to hurriedly implement laws that could erode public confidence,” Ajaero stated. He further highlighted the importance of social justice in taxation, asserting that all citizens are entitled to dignity, access to quality healthcare and education, and a fair economic system. The NLC president reiterated that any tax law excluding workers from the legislative process is fundamentally unfair. Ajaero called for tax justice, emphasizing the need for equitable distribution of the tax burden. According to him, wealthy individuals and corporations should contribute fairly, while all regressive taxes that disproportionately affect lower-income earners must be removed. “During this festive season and beyond, we must demand tax fairness where the affluent shoulder their responsibilities and regressive taxes are eliminated,” he remarked. Beyond taxation, Ajaero stressed the necessity of workers’ rights, fair wages, and safe working conditions, calling for greater equity across all sectors of employment. He also underscored the role of national security, noting that Nigerians must be able to carry out lawful activities without fear or intimidation. In a broader perspective, Ajaero encouraged citizens to practice collective self-empowerment, which he described as a form of strategic ‘self-love.’ According to him, national progress requires confronting corruption, exploitation, injustice, insecurity, and poor governance. “This self-love is not selfish; it is strategic. It is expressed through our commitment to collectively protect our wages, pensions, rights, and dignity,” he explained. Ajaero concluded that Nigeria can only achieve a society rooted in justice, equity, and shared prosperity through collective determination.
Kindly Share:
The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC) has reportedly commenced discussions aimed at selling stakes in several of its oil and gas holdings, according to a recent Reuters report. This strategic move comes as the state-owned energy corporation works to optimize its investment portfolio and attract fresh foreign and domestic investments into Nigeria’s oil and gas sector. An official invitation document released on Monday revealed that the national oil company has invited bids from interested investors. However, the company did not disclose the specific percentage of stakes available or the total funds it hopes to generate from this initiative. The document stated: “The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited, Nigeria’s state-owned energy company and a leading player in Africa’s oil industry, intends to sell stakes in select oil and gas assets and has officially called for investor bids.” NNPC’s portfolio includes interests in multiple oil and gas assets, with some wholly owned by the company and others operated in collaboration with global energy giants such as Shell, Chevron, Eni, and TotalEnergies. These partnerships are designed to leverage international expertise while enhancing production efficiency across the country’s hydrocarbon sector. The report further explained that prospective investors must register online by January 10 to participate in the bidding process. Following registration, there will be a pre-screening evaluation to assess bidder qualifications. Firms that successfully pass this stage will gain access to a secure virtual data room, where they can review comprehensive details about the assets on sale. This initiative aligns with broader government and industry efforts to increase foreign direct investment (FDI) in Nigeria’s energy sector while modernizing the operations of NNPC to meet international best practices. Experts suggest that the sale of stakes could also help the company raise capital for infrastructure development, production optimization, and expansion projects across the oil and gas value chain.
Kindly Share:
The New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP) has made a passionate public appeal to the Governor of Kano State, Abba Kabir Yusuf, urging him not to abandon the party for the All Progressives Congress (APC). The call was made during a press briefing held in Kano on Monday by the Kano State Chairman of the NNPP, Suleiman Dungurawa. Speaking on behalf of the party’s leadership and supporters, Dungurawa emphasized that any move by the governor to join the APC would go against the collective will and sacrifices of party members and voters who stood firmly with the NNPP during past elections. According to him, the party remains deeply concerned about ongoing political developments within Kano State, particularly reports suggesting that some individuals are making plans to defect to the APC. He stressed that such actions do not represent the position of the NNPP at either the state or national level. Dungurawa also addressed circulating rumors claiming that certain party members were attempting to create tension between Governor Abba Yusuf and the NNPP’s national leader, Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso. He firmly dismissed these claims, describing them as baseless and misleading, and warned the public not to be deceived by such narratives. In a message directed at residents of Kano State, the NNPP chairman encouraged citizens to remain peaceful and continue with their normal and lawful activities, despite the political speculation surrounding the state. He further cautioned party loyalists against associating themselves with documents or materials allegedly being distributed by individuals he described as troublemakers. Speaking emotionally, Dungurawa said the party was once again calling on its leaders, in the spirit of faith and unity, not to leave the NNPP for a political platform they had openly opposed in the past and which, according to him, the majority of voters had rejected. He made it clear that the NNPP leadership at all levels — including the Kano State chapter, the national structure of the party, and Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso — does not support or endorse any defection plans currently being discussed. This appeal comes amid earlier remarks credited to the Director-General of the Protocol Directorate at the Kano State Government House, Abdullahi Rogo, who reportedly claimed that Kano residents and voters had reached a consensus that both Governor Abba Yusuf and Senator Rabiu Kwankwaso should move from the NNPP to the APC. The situation has continued to generate discussions across the state, as political stakeholders and supporters closely watch the next steps of the NNPP leadership in Kano.
Kindly Share:
The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, has stated clearly that there is no ambiguity about his political position regarding President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, insisting that he does not require any special meeting to declare where his loyalty lies. Wike made this known during an end-of-year media interaction held in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, where he addressed several political issues, including recent comments made by Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde. According to Wike, Nigerians are already well aware of his political alignment, especially concerning his support for President Tinubu’s administration. The FCT Minister was reacting to claims credited to Governor Makinde, who had earlier alleged that Wike, during a visit to the Presidential Villa in 2024, told President Tinubu that he would “hold the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)” for him. Wike firmly rejected this claim, describing it as inaccurate and misleading. Clarifying the circumstances surrounding the meeting with the President, Wike explained that the visit had no connection whatsoever with the internal affairs or control of the PDP. Instead, he noted that the engagement was purely a show of support for the President’s leadership and governance direction. Wike emphasized that his stance on Tinubu has never been hidden, adding that there was no need for a private discussion to express his support. He maintained that his political position has always been open and consistent, making any suggestion of secret commitments unnecessary. In his words, Wike stressed that as a serving minister in the Tinubu administration, he carries the responsibility of ensuring that members of the G-5 group are not sidelined and that they benefit from the federal government’s policies and opportunities in one way or another. The former Rivers State governor also turned his attention to governance issues in Oyo State, stating that Governor Makinde has an obligation to be transparent with the people of the state. Wike pointed specifically to the ₦50 billion intervention fund reportedly released by the Tinubu administration following the January 2024 explosion in the Bodija area of Ibadan. According to Wike, such a significant sum of public funds should be properly accounted for, noting that due process requires the money to be formally appropriated before expenditure. He insisted that residents of Oyo State deserve a clear explanation on how the funds were utilized. Wike’s comments highlight ongoing political tensions within opposition ranks while also underscoring broader concerns about accountability, transparency, and political alignment in Nigeria’s evolving political landscape.
Kindly Share:
The Chairman of the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, Taiwo Oyedele, has pushed back against claims made by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Air Peace, Allen Onyema, regarding the impact of Nigeria’s newly introduced tax reforms on the aviation sector. Oyedele maintained that the revised tax framework is structured to ease operational pressure on airlines rather than damage the industry. Oyedele explained that the reforms are aimed at correcting deep-rooted fiscal problems that have affected airline operators for years. According to him, the new tax laws should not be linked to increasing airfare costs or projected shutdowns within the aviation space. This response followed Onyema’s comments during an interview on Arise Television on Sunday, where he warned that domestic airline operators might be forced out of business within a few months if the tax reforms, expected to commence on January 1, 2026, are implemented without further adjustments. During the interview, Onyema blamed high ticket prices on numerous taxes and statutory charges imposed on airlines. He specifically raised concerns about a 7.5 percent Value Added Tax (VAT) on airline tickets, suggesting that such charges could push economy-class fares to as much as ₦1.7 million, thereby limiting access to air travel for many Nigerians. Reacting to these assertions, Oyedele released a statement on X (formerly Twitter) on Monday, acknowledging the operational and financial struggles currently facing Nigeria’s aviation industry. However, he clarified that the federal government, through the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, has been in continuous discussions with airline operators to reduce cost pressures and introduce long-term relief measures. One of the most significant changes highlighted by Oyedele is the removal of the 10 percent withholding tax previously applied to aircraft leasing arrangements. He noted that this tax had been a major contributor to high operating expenses for airlines, particularly because it was non-recoverable under the old tax system. Under the new tax structure, the withholding tax on aircraft leases has been replaced with a rate that will be determined through regulation. This adjustment allows for the possibility of a full exemption or, at the very least, a substantial reduction, thereby lowering operational costs for airline operators. Oyedele further explained that the reforms will ensure full VAT neutrality for airlines. This means that airlines will be able to reclaim VAT paid on imported aircraft, locally sourced equipment, aviation fuel, consumables, and essential services. Such a system, he said, would prevent VAT from becoming a hidden cost within airline operations. Additionally, he disclosed that any excess input VAT incurred by airline operators would either be refunded within 30 days or credited against other tax obligations. This mechanism is expected to improve cash flow, enhance liquidity, and support sustainable airline operations. Oyedele emphasized that the tax reforms are designed to be part of the solution rather than the cause of the aviation sector’s challenges. He stressed that several long-standing tax-related cost drivers affecting the industry have either been eliminated or structurally addressed under the new tax laws. He reaffirmed the government’s recognition of the multiple taxes, levies, and regulatory charges confronting the aviation industry and assured stakeholders that ongoing engagements would continue to focus on easing these burdens and strengthening the sector.
Kindly Share:
Popular Islamic scholar, Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, has openly criticized the United States government over its use of expensive military weapons, urging the country to focus on education and social development for herders rather than deploying multi-million-dollar bombs. According to the cleric, many herders are trapped in ignorance and require enlightenment, not violence. He argued that bombing communities does not solve the root problem, which he described as a lack of education and awareness. Sheikh Gumi made this statement while reacting to a viral video showing a Fulani herder who reportedly stumbled upon a barrel believed to be part of a missile fired during a U.S. military operation. The cleric expressed concern that the man in the video appeared unaware of the danger posed by unexploded military devices. Reacting publicly, Gumi explained that the herder’s actions reflected deep-rooted ignorance rather than intentional wrongdoing. He emphasized that such individuals often lack basic knowledge, including understanding religious principles and recognizing life-threatening hazards such as unexploded bombs. Taking to his official Facebook page, the cleric stated that most herders need deliverance from ignorance rather than bombardment. He added that the individual in the video neither understood the core teachings of Islam nor grasped the serious danger associated with unexploded military weapons lying in open fields. Gumi further revealed that his response to this long-standing issue has been to build schools and support educational initiatives for herders, stressing that education is a sustainable solution. He argued that the amount of money used to drop a single bomb—estimated at $2 million—could instead be channeled into constructing schools and providing basic amenities that would positively transform lives. The comments followed reports that on Christmas Day, the United States military, acting on the directive of President Donald Trump, conducted airstrikes in Sokoto State, Nigeria. The operation was reportedly aimed at neutralizing ISIS and Lakurawa terrorist groups, but the mission failed to hit its intended targets. The Nigerian government later confirmed the incident, describing it as a coordinated military operation. Authorities also disclosed that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu had approved the mission, emphasizing that it was carried out in collaboration with international partners. Despite the official explanation, Sheikh Gumi maintained that military force alone cannot address insecurity, insisting that education, awareness, and social development remain the most effective tools for lasting peace.
Kindly Share:
The political tension in Oyo State has intensified as the All Progressives Congress (APC) yesterday demanded that Governor Seyi Makinde provide a detailed account of how he managed the N50 billion relief fund allegedly received from President Bola Tinubu. The fund was intended to assist victims of the catastrophic explosion that devastated parts of Bodija GRA in Ibadan in January 2024. APC went further to assert that Governor Makinde should resign if he fails to account for the funds. The controversy resurfaced after former Ekiti State Governor, Ayodele Fayose, claimed during a live broadcast on Friday that Governor Makinde collected the N50 billion from President Tinubu to support those affected by the tragic incident. According to Fayose, Makinde neither acknowledged the receipt of the funds publicly nor utilised them to aid victims who lost lives and properties. Oyo APC, through its Publicity Secretary Olawale Sadare, condemned Governor Makinde for making disparaging comments about President Tinubu and his Minister of Power, Chief Adebayo Adelabu. During a recent media engagement, Makinde reportedly criticized the President for allegedly requesting that he organise the APC in the state and accused the Minister of Power of lacking capacity to deliver on his mandate. In response, Fayose released official documents to substantiate his claims, revealing that the N50 billion was approved as emergency financial support after the deadly explosion. Makinde had previously denied these allegations, challenging Fayose to provide proof of the funds’ disbursement. The released documents suggest that only N4.5 billion of the relief fund was distributed to the victims of the Bodija GRA explosion, while the remaining money was allegedly diverted to support Governor Makinde’s purported political ambitions, including plans for a presidential run. Fayose stated that he made the documents public to enable Nigerians to independently assess the credibility of the Oyo State government. He also invited Makinde to pursue legal action against him, maintaining that other financial aid sent by the Tinubu administration to Oyo State had not been publicly disclosed. However, the debate has also drawn reactions from within Governor Makinde’s party. A faction of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Oyo State, known as the Oyo PDP-Visionaries, criticized Fayose, labeling him “a disgrace to public service for failing to distinguish between a request and an approval.” The group issued a statement after Fayose published a letter allegedly showing Oyo State’s request for N50 billion for the reconstruction of the Dejo Oyelese/Adeyi Avenue area post-explosion. Qudus Olayide, coordinator of the Oyo PDP-Visionaries, criticized Fayose for attempting to justify his previous claims by presenting a Ministry of Finance document that merely reflected the state’s request for funds, not the actual approval or disbursement. The PDP faction described Fayose’s actions as shameful, stating that his attempt to mislead the public was both demeaning and concerning. They challenged him to release an authentic document showing the federal government’s approval of the N50 billion, insisting that the public deserves transparency regarding how emergency funds are allocated and utilised. This latest development highlights the ongoing political friction in Oyo State, as both APC and PDP continue to contest the narrative surrounding the relief funds meant for explosion victims. It also underscores broader concerns about accountability, transparency, and governance in the allocation of federal emergency support to states during crises.
Kindly Share:
Niyi Aborisade, a human rights lawyer based in the United Kingdom and a prominent member of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), recently shared his insights on the current political landscape in Nigeria. In an exclusive conversation with ROTIMI AGBOLUAJE, he accused the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) of deliberately instigating internal crises within opposition parties, aiming to weaken them ahead of the 2027 general elections. Concerns About the Opposition and PDP’s Future When asked about the challenges facing Nigeria’s opposition parties, particularly the PDP, Aborisade affirmed his commitment to the party but expressed deep concern over its present state. He stated, “I am still a registered and active member of the PDP. Yet, the current dynamics within the party make it extremely challenging to foresee its future.” He emphasized that political parties are meant to serve as vehicles for ideological expression, organizational cohesion, and the aggregation of collective interests. “Sadly, what we are seeing today is a PDP struggling to define its identity, maintain internal cohesion, and even protect its existence. For someone like me who strongly believes in opposition politics as a cornerstone of democracy, witnessing this decline is both troubling and painful.” Is the PDP Facing an Existential Crisis? Aborisade was cautious but realistic when discussing whether the PDP could survive its internal turmoil. He noted, “I am not claiming to predict the future. Politics is fluid, and unexpected turnarounds can occur. However, when evaluated objectively, the PDP faces an existential crisis.” Internal conflicts have reached unprecedented levels. Factions within the party have solidified, reconciliation attempts have repeatedly failed, and trust among party leaders is virtually nonexistent. “The uncertainty is so profound that many members, from grassroots operatives to senior leaders, are unsure if the PDP will be able to field candidates in upcoming elections,” Aborisade added. Such instability is lethal for any political organization. Without guaranteed participation in elections, a party cannot effectively mobilize members, raise funds, or inspire voter confidence. Aborisade warned that without urgent corrective measures, the PDP could face a structural collapse. Root Causes of the PDP Crisis Aborisade identified internal power struggles and personal ambition as the core drivers of the party’s crisis. He explained that some members prioritize individual gain over collective survival, seeing the PDP as a ladder for personal advancement rather than a platform for national service. “Once personal ambitions are threatened, some actors are willing to jeopardize the entire party. This is particularly tragic because mechanisms for conflict resolution were available. Even interventions by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), including a roundtable discussion led by its chairman, failed to produce meaningful results. Instead of compromise, entrenched positions hardened further.” The conflict has escalated beyond party structures, reaching the Court of Appeal, and may eventually move to the Supreme Court. According to Aborisade, “Relying on prolonged litigation to determine a party’s fate is a dangerous gamble for anyone whose political career is tied to that platform.” How Can the PDP Salvage Its Situation? The PDP’s salvation, Aborisade believes, lies in genuine compromise. “Politics is negotiation, not warfare. For the PDP to survive, leaders must set aside ego, bitterness, and the desire to win every internal skirmish. Both sides must be willing to make concessions to save the party.” He added that no court judgment, media strategy, or propaganda campaign can replace internal reconciliation. Litigation may bring technical victories, but unity is achieved only through dialogue, concessions, and goodwill. Without such measures, the PDP will continue to decline, regardless of court orders or public statements. The Wike Saga: Suspension and Counter-Suspension The suspension and counter-suspension involving former Rivers State Governor Nyesom Wike, Aborisade argued, have turned into a political circus. “Certain party organs claim to have suspended Wike, while he claims to have suspended those who allegedly suspended him. Yet, he continues to consider himself a PDP member while actively undermining the party.” Wike’s reported parallel party structures, support for rival platforms, and threats of alternative conventions have created confusion both in Rivers State and nationally. “At this point, predicting who will prevail is nearly impossible. Beyond the drama, however, lies a deeper political dimension,” Aborisade noted. The Hidden Forces Behind the Crisis Aborisade invoked a Yoruba proverb to illustrate the situation: “The insect dancing on the surface of water is responding to the drummer beneath.” The visible actors may be obvious, but the true drivers of the crisis—the “drummers”—remain hidden yet powerful. He implied that forces beyond the PDP itself are sustaining the turmoil. When pressed about the identity of these forces, Aborisade pointed directly to the APC-led Federal Government and the Presidency. “The facts are telling: Wike is a serving minister under the APC government, Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara has defected to the APC, and governors in Plateau and Taraba states have also abandoned the PDP for the APC.” This, he contends, suggests a deliberate effort by the ruling party to weaken opposition structures and consolidate power ahead of the 2027 elections.
Kindly Share:
The recent U.S. military operations targeting alleged terrorist strongholds in Sokoto have propelled Nigeria into a sensitive stage of its counter-terrorism efforts. The strikes have sparked a robust debate on the balance between national sovereignty, governance gaps, and the appropriateness of foreign intervention in domestic security matters. Economic Repercussions and Government Response The implications extend far beyond security and politics. Investor confidence has been unsettled, prompting the Federal Government to act swiftly to reassure local and international markets that these operations will not compromise Nigeria’s economic stability or its ongoing reform programs. Officials emphasize that Nigeria remains committed to preserving its fiscal integrity and sustaining reforms aimed at attracting foreign investment. Support from Pan-Yoruba Coalition The Alliance for Yoruba Democratic Movements (AYDM), a coalition of approximately 130 pan-Yoruba organizations, praised the intervention as a necessary initiative to curtail the escalating threat of violent extremism. In a statement signed by General Secretary Popoola Ajayi and Rasaq Arogundade, the coalition encouraged Nigerian authorities to maintain intelligence-led cooperation with international allies, noting that combating terrorism effectively requires global partnerships. “We commend the actions against terrorists attempting to dominate Nigerian territories,” AYDM stated. “These measures highlight Nigeria’s progress in establishing impactful international partnerships. Yet, airstrikes alone will not resolve the crisis.” Calls for Arrest of Ideological Leaders AYDM also directed strong criticism at Islamic cleric Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, accusing him of being the intellectual architect behind extremist activities in the country. The coalition demanded his immediate arrest and indicated its intent to campaign both locally and internationally for his prosecution at the International Criminal Court (ICC). “Sheikh Gumi should face justice. He presents himself as an Islamic scholar but propagates terrorist ideology,” the group added, highlighting the urgency of holding ideological leaders accountable. Security Alert for South-West States The coalition issued warnings to governors in the South-West, emphasizing that retaliatory attacks from terrorist factions could shift toward the region. Lagos, as Nigeria’s commercial hub and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s political stronghold, was particularly highlighted as a potential target. Calls for Structural Reforms AYDM framed the rising Islamic extremism as a “violent clash of civilizations,” advocating for extensive constitutional reforms. The group proposed decentralization and restructuring of Nigeria to enable ethnic self-determination, allowing groups with differing governance philosophies—democratic versus theocratic—to coexist within their own sovereign regions. “It is time to restructure Nigeria so that communities valuing democracy and those favoring a theocratic framework can exist independently within their own sovereign republics,” the statement urged. Expanding Security Partnerships The coalition further recommended that Nigeria diversify its international security collaborations. Beyond the U.S., nations such as Russia and Israel—known for their counter-terrorism expertise—should be engaged to strengthen Nigeria’s security framework. “Nigeria requires all possible allies to combat terrorism effectively. Engaging Russia, given its counter-terrorism operations in the Sahel, is essential if Nigeria aims to confront these threats decisively,” AYDM emphasized. Criticism from Political Activists Contrastingly, Gbenga Hashim, a former presidential candidate and political activist, characterized the U.S. strikes as a damning critique of Nigeria’s security architecture. Hashim highlighted that the airstrikes reflect global concern over Nigeria’s deteriorating security environment, particularly in the North-West, where terrorist groups are allegedly expanding territorial influence. “The intervention by the United States is a stark indictment of our national security framework and the failures of the APC-led administration,” Hashim remarked, urging the government to strengthen domestic security operations to regain public and international confidence.
Kindly Share:
The year 2025 came with moments of deep sorrow for Nigeria as several influential political figures and respected national leaders passed away within the year. These individuals, who entered the new year with optimism, could not see its end, leaving behind legacies that shaped governance, advocacy, and public service across different regions of the country. While some of these prominent Nigerians died early in 2025, others took their final bow toward the end of the year. Their deaths triggered nationwide reactions, with tributes pouring in from political leaders, traditional rulers, civil society groups, and ordinary citizens who had followed their journeys for decades. LMSINT MEDIA revisits the deaths of seven notable politicians whose passing deeply affected the nation in 2025. Hon. Adewunmi Onanuga – Deputy Chief Whip, House of Representatives The first major political loss recorded in 2025 was that of Honourable Adewunmi Onanuga, who was serving as the Deputy Chief Whip of the House of Representatives at the time of her death. Onanuga, a respected lawmaker representing Ikenne/Sagamu/Remo North Federal Constituency of Ogun State, died on January 15, 2025, following a brief illness. Her death came as a shock to colleagues and constituents, given her active participation in legislative affairs. She had been re-elected into the House in 2023 and later appointed Deputy Chief Whip of the 10th National Assembly. The seasoned parliamentarian passed away at the age of 60, cutting short a political career marked by dedication to grassroots representation and legislative discipline. Pa Ayo Adebanjo – Afenifere Leader and Yoruba Nationalist Barely two months into the year, Nigeria lost one of its most vocal elder statesmen, Pa Ayo Adebanjo, a renowned nationalist and leader of the Pan-Yoruba socio-cultural organization, Afenifere. Adebanjo died peacefully at his residence in Lekki, Lagos State, on February 14, 2025, at the age of 96. Known for his unwavering stance on restructuring, democracy, and true federalism, his death marked the end of an era in Yoruba and Nigerian political advocacy. After weeks of tributes and memorial activities, the late elder statesman was laid to rest on May 3, 2025, in his hometown, Isanya Ogbo, near Ijebu-Ode in Ogun State. Chief Edwin Kiagbodo Clark – Ijaw Leader and Former Federal Commissioner Just days after Adebanjo’s passing, Nigeria was again thrown into mourning with the death of Chief Edwin Kiagbodo Clark on February 17, 2025. Clark, a former Federal Commissioner for Information and a prominent leader of the Ijaw ethnic nationality, died at the age of 98 after a brief illness at a private hospital in Abuja. His death came as a rude shock to many, especially as he had recently been seen attending public engagements without visible signs of ill health. Reports later revealed that he developed breathing complications on the night of February 16, prompting his emergency transfer to the hospital where he eventually passed on. The elder statesman was buried on May 13, 2025, in Kiagbodo, Delta State, amid tributes from across the Niger Delta and beyond. Doyin Okupe – Politician and Media Strategist Veteran politician and communication strategist Doyin Okupe died on March 7, 2025, at the age of 72, after battling a prolonged illness. Okupe served as a presidential spokesperson to former Presidents Olusegun Obasanjo and Goodluck Jonathan, and was widely regarded for his influence in Nigeria’s political media space. He later emerged as the Director-General of Peter Obi’s 2023 Presidential Campaign. He passed away in Lagos State, and was buried on March 28, 2025, in his hometown, Iperu-Remo, located in Ikenne Local Government Area of Ogun State. Cornelius Olatunji Adebayo – Former Governor of Kwara State Another major political loss recorded in mid-2025 was the death of Cornelius Olatunji Adebayo, a former senator and ex-governor of Kwara State. Adebayo, who governed Kwara State during the Second Republic, died on June 25, 2025, at the age of 84. Beyond his role as governor, he also served as Minister of Communications and Transportation under former President Olusegun Obasanjo between 2003 and 2006. The elder statesman was later buried in his hometown in Isin Local Government Area of Kwara State. Muhammadu Buhari – Former President of Nigeria Nigeria’s immediate past president, Muhammadu Buhari, died in London, United Kingdom, on July 13, 2026, at the age of 82, following a brief illness. Despite his death occurring abroad, arrangements were swiftly made for his burial in Nigeria. Buhari was laid to rest on July 15, 2025, in his hometown of Daura, Katsina State. His burial attracted several dignitaries from within and outside Nigeria, including sitting presidents, former heads of state, and top government officials who gathered to pay their final respects. Lawrence Ewhrudjakpo – Deputy Governor of Bayelsa State Towards the end of 2025, tragedy struck Bayelsa State with the sudden death of its Deputy Governor, Lawrence Ewhrudjakpo, on December 11. Ewhrudjakpo reportedly slumped while working in his office and was confirmed dead shortly afterward. In response, the state governor, Senator Douye Diri, ordered an autopsy to medically establish the cause of death. As a mark of respect, the governor declared a three-day mourning period across the state and directed that all flags be flown at half-mast, reflecting the deep sense of loss felt by the government and people of Bayelsa.
Kindly Share:
The Social Democratic Party (SDP) has given a detailed explanation for its decision to withdraw from ongoing coalition negotiations aimed at unseating President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in the 2027 general elections. Prince Adewole Adebayo, who served as the SDP’s presidential flagbearer during the 2023 election, disclosed that the talks eventually failed due to serious concerns surrounding credibility, ideological alignment, and personal integrity among some opposition figures involved in the discussions. While speaking with journalists on Sunday, Adebayo made it clear that the SDP is not fundamentally against coalition arrangements. However, he emphasized that the party would not associate with individuals whose political history, conduct, or values conflict with the principles upon which the SDP stands. According to him, merely opposing President Tinubu or the ruling administration is not a sufficient basis for forming a political alliance. He stressed that opposition politics must go beyond shared dissatisfaction and be rooted in a clear vision, ethical leadership, and policy-driven objectives. Adebayo further revealed that several politicians who expressed interest in joining the coalition were subjected to internal assessments by the party. Following this screening process, many were turned away, while some were not even considered fit to advance to the interview stage. He alleged that certain opposition actors were attempting to take advantage of public frustration with the current government, without presenting any meaningful or credible solutions to Nigeria’s long-standing challenges. According to him, exploiting public anger without offering responsible alternatives only deepens political distrust. The SDP leader warned that removing the current leadership only to replace it with individuals he described as potentially “more damaging” would not improve the country’s situation. He maintained that Nigerians would gain nothing from a power shift driven solely by selfish motives or personal ambition. Adebayo also took a strong stance against politicians facing unresolved corruption allegations who are now positioning themselves as reform-minded alternatives. He argued that such individuals lack the moral standing required to lead a nation grappling with governance and accountability issues. He reiterated that for any coalition to be meaningful and effective, it must be built on shared ideology, transparency, accountability, and a concrete plan to confront Nigeria’s economic, social, and political problems. According to Adebayo, politicians seeking alliances must first accept responsibility for their contribution to the country’s current difficulties before presenting themselves as champions of change. In conclusion, he stated that the SDP would rather stay outside government than compromise its core values. He emphasized that betraying public trust for political gain is not an option, reaffirming the party’s commitment to integrity over access to power.
