A Nigerian lawyer and political commentator, Malcolm Emokiniovo Omirhobo, has argued that the life sentence handed to the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, has once again uncovered what he describes as a troubling example of Nigeria’s selective justice system.
Omirhobo stressed that the contrasting treatment between Kanu and individuals like Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, who remains unrestricted, raises serious questions about fairness, rule of law, and equal treatment of citizens. He noted that this disparity strongly suggests the existence of a two-layered justice structure—one that aggressively prosecutes some Nigerians, while simultaneously protecting others who are seen by the public as having engaged in comparable or more controversial activities.
He emphasized that this situation reflects a disturbing reality in which legal consequences depend not only on actions but often on identity, political sentiment, region, ethnic background, or perceived alignment with those in authority. This, he said, reinforces the belief among many citizens that justice in Nigeria is not always blind, impartial, or consistent.
The lawyer maintained that such uneven administration of justice threatens national unity, increases distrust in government institutions, and fuels the perception that some individuals are above the law while others are subjected to excessive punishment. He warned that unless these contradictions are addressed, Nigeria risks deepening feelings of alienation, resentment, and marginalization among the groups who believe they are routinely targeted.
Omirhobo concluded that the sentencing of Nnamdi Kanu, while figures like Sheikh Gumi remain untouched, stands as a powerful example of selective justice and a reminder of the urgent need for reforms to ensure equity, transparency, and credibility within Nigeria’s justice system.
Kindly Share:
Discover more from LMSINT STORE
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
