Vice President Kashim Shettima has officially touched down in Johannesburg, South Africa, to represent President Bola Tinubu at the highly anticipated G20 Leaders’ Summit. This international gathering, which brings together leaders from the world’s largest economies, serves as a platform to discuss critical issues shaping the global economic and political landscape. During the summit, Vice President Shettima is poised to champion Nigeria’s strategic interests across multiple domains, including economic collaboration, security alliances, climate financing initiatives, and sustainable global development programs. His participation underscores Nigeria’s commitment to fostering partnerships that enhance both regional and global stability. A statement released on Friday by Stanley Nkwocha, the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Communications (Office of the Vice President), confirmed Shettima’s attendance and outlined the importance of Nigeria’s engagement in discussions at the G20 Summit. The vice president’s presence highlights Nigeria’s proactive approach in contributing to international policymaking and promoting Africa’s economic voice on the world stage. Beyond economic discussions, the G20 Summit will offer a platform for dialogue on climate change mitigation, global security cooperation, and innovative solutions for development financing. Shettima’s engagements are expected to reinforce Nigeria’s standing as a key stakeholder in shaping sustainable policies and driving collaborative global growth. For more insights on Nigeria’s participation in international summits and foreign policy updates, visit our Politics & Global Affairs section.
The Minister of State for Defence, Bello Matawalle, has disclosed that security agencies are drawing closer to the hideout where the abducted students from Kebbi State are believed to be held. He confirmed that recent intelligence reports have provided strong leads, suggesting that the security teams are narrowing the distance between them and the kidnappers. According to an earlier report by LMSINT MEDIA, a total of 25 female students were abducted from the Government Girls’ Comprehensive Secondary School in Maga, located in Kebbi State. The tragic incident occurred in the early hours of Monday, 17 November, when armed men stormed the school premises. During the attack, the armed group fatally shot the school’s vice principal, Malami Hassan Yakubu Makuku, before forcefully taking the schoolgirls away to an undisclosed location. The abduction has since sparked widespread concern among parents, community leaders, and security analysts across the country. Matawalle assured Nigerians that the government is intensifying rescue operations and that every available intelligence mechanism is being deployed. He emphasized that the mission remains a priority for the Defence Ministry, promising that the authorities are determined to ensure the safe return of the children. He further urged citizens to remain patient and hopeful as the rescue efforts continue, noting that progress is being made behind the scenes.
Kindly Share:
Dickson Iroegbu, a notable figure in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and an active member of the Obidient movement, has criticised President Bola Tinubu for what he describes as a delayed response to the escalating insecurity affecting various regions of Nigeria. Iroegbu voiced his concerns on Friday during an appearance on Prime Time, a flagship programme on Arise Television, which was closely followed and monitored by LMSINT MEDIA. According to him, the current administration should have acted much earlier to confront the rising wave of violence, abductions, and general instability troubling citizens nationwide. His remarks were made in direct reaction to the intensifying security upheaval spreading across the country, a situation that has sparked widespread public anxiety and calls for urgent intervention. Iroegbu argued that the government’s slow pace in addressing the issue has contributed to the worsening circumstances, emphasizing that Nigerians expect a more proactive approach from their leaders. He stressed that focusing on the safety of citizens should be a top priority, especially at a time when communities continue to face relentless attacks. Iroegbu’s statements highlight growing frustration among political actors and the general public regarding the ongoing security challenges confronting Nigeria.
Kindly Share:
Former President Goodluck Jonathan has delivered a powerful caution: politics must not be trivialized into a mere playground for disorder and reckless behaviour. Speaking at the 10th anniversary dinner of the Goodluck Jonathan Foundation — which also coincided with his 68th birthday — Jonathan emphasized that Nigeria’s democracy is at risk of being suffocated by irresponsible political conduct. He argued that true leadership should rest upon three pillars: responsibility, nation‑building, and restraint. Without these, he warned, political actors risk destabilizing the very democratic institutions they claim to defend. Jonathan further lamented the trend of aggressive rhetoric and hostile political behaviour across Nigeria. This, he said, weakens democratic resilience not just in Nigeria, but across the continent. Reflecting on his foundation’s mission over the past decade, Jonathan recounted how the Goodluck Jonathan Foundation has concentrated on diplomacy, governance reforms, peacebuilding, mediation, and the fortification of democratic institutions. He also sounded the alarm over recent violence in Nigeria, including attacks and abductions, calling on political leaders at all levels to take their duty to citizens seriously — to safeguard lives while upholding democratic order. Vice President Kashim Shettima, representing President Bola Tinubu at the event, paid tribute to Jonathan’s legacy. He singled out Jonathan’s 2015 concession of defeat a turning point that, in his view, preserved Nigeria from potential crisis. Shettima also praised Jonathan’s post-presidency role, noting that his continued commitment to public service and democratic values has made him one of Africa’s most respected statesmen. Meanwhile, Taminu Turaki, newly elected PDP national chairman, commended the Goodluck Jonathan Foundation for its impact across Africa — highlighting its work in conflict resolution, democracy strengthening, and peacebuilding. The foundation’s Executive Director, Ann Iyonu, offered a heartfelt reflection on their decade-long journey. She emphasized the resilience, purpose, and grace that have guided their mission to build a continent where peace thrives and democratic institutions are strong. Jonathan’s message was simple but profound: “Politics is not for rascals. It is for people who want to build, not destroy.” Why This Matters
Kindly Share:
US Congressman Riley M. Moore has made a striking statement: many Nigerians have lost trust in their government. During a hearing of the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Africa, which is examining the issue of Nigeria’s redesignation as a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC), he expressed deep concern over the perceived failure of the Nigerian leadership. Moore pointedly asked: “How can you trust a government that doesn’t show up when you ask it to?” He argued that widespread distrust is rooted in the government’s inability — or unwillingness — to respond effectively to security requests. He recalled a recent incident in Plateau State, where a pastor reportedly warned the authorities of an imminent attack within 24 hours, but was allegedly ignored. Instead of action, according to Moore, the government issued a press release dismissing the warning as “fake news.” This statement from Congressman Moore comes at a time when he is pressing strongly for the U.S. State Department, led by Secretary Marco Rubio, to re-designate Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC). He argues this should be done because of what he describes as “systematic persecution” and mass killings of Christians in parts of Nigeria. Moore’s position has strong backing: more than 55 U.S.-based organizations — including faith-based, legal, and human-rights groups — have endorsed his resolution condemning Christian persecution in Nigeria. He highlights alarming data: over 7,000 Christians were reportedly killed in 2025 alone, and since 2009 nearly 19,000 churches have been attacked or destroyed, per his sources. He also warns of the possible diplomatic consequences: redesignating Nigeria as a CPC could lead to the suspension of U.S. arms sales and technical assistance. According to Moore, the U.S. must use all available diplomatic tools to pressure Nigeria into protecting vulnerable communities. In a recent high-level meeting in Washington, where a Nigerian government delegation was present (led by National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu), Moore issued a pointed warning that “President Trump does not make idle threats.” He stressed that while the U.S. is ready to cooperate on counterinsurgency, the Nigerian government must demonstrate a commitment to safeguarding religious minorities. Moore has further introduced a formal House resolution, condemning what he calls ongoing atrocities against Christians in Nigeria and supporting the CPC re-designation. He argues this is not just a moral issue, but one of international accountability and human rights. Context & Reactions Not surprisingly, Moore’s rhetoric has sparked strong reactions within Nigeria. Aides to President Tinubu have sharply criticized him. One such aide described his characterization of Nigeria as “ignorant” and politically motivated. The Nigerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has also officially rejected his claims, calling them false and misleading. According to the ministry, the violence in Nigeria is not solely religious; many Nigerians Christian and Muslim alike are victims of terrorism and banditry. Why This Matters
Kindly Share:
United States Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal has issued a strong appeal to her colleagues: they should not pressure or threaten Nigeria amid its ongoing security crisis. She made this plea during a U.S. congressional public hearing focused on Nigeria’s plight, following its recent redesignation as a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC). At the hearing which is investigating former President Donald Trump’s decision to reclassify Nigeria Jayapal explicitly rebuked the idea of using military coercion. She was responding to Trump’s warning that the U.S. might take military action in Nigeria if violence against Christians does not stop. Jayapal argued that bullying a critical partner like Nigeria is misguided. She said she prefers a collaborative strategy grounded in diplomacy rather than threats. In her view, resorting to aggressive posturing for example, via social media platforms undermines the seriousness of the situation and risks damaging bilateral relations. She stated: “I just wish we would stick to that playbook, rather than bully and threaten Nigeria … I don’t think it’s the right way to go … to threaten with ‘guns blazing.’” Broader Context: Why the Hearing Matters This hearing is part of a broader debate in Washington over how to respond to Nigeria’s security challenges. The country has witnessed a surge in violence, particularly in areas where extremist groups operate, and some U.S. legislators are demanding robust action. Representative Chris Smith, chairing the panel, has emphasized that the CPC designation is only an initial step. He urged the U.S. to apply all available tools — including conditional aid, sanctions, and support for faith-based humanitarian groups on the ground. But Jayapal warns against framing the crisis purely in religious terms. She highlighted that religion is only one factor, noting research that points to other root causes: armed extremism, farmer-herder conflicts, climate stress, and governance failures. She underscored Nigeria’s importance to the U.S. — not only as a spiritual concern but also as a strategic and regional partner. Rather than issuing threats or ultimatums, she advocated for sustained engagement: investment in community development, interfaith dialogue, and strengthening institutions. The Risk of Escalation Some of Jayapal’s colleagues share her concern. Congresswoman Sara Jacobs, for instance, labeled Trump’s threat of military intervention as “reckless.” She noted that Congress has not authorized force against Nigeria — and unilaterally intervening would raise serious legal and ethical questions. Analysts also point out that there is nuance to Nigeria’s insecurity: not all violence is purely religious. According to experts, many attacks are linked to land disputes, Boko Haram insurgency, and intercommunal conflicts not just persecution of Christians. Meanwhile, some U.S. lawmakers are pushing for concrete policy steps. These include: Why Jayapal’s Warning Resonates Jayapal’s message is significant for several reasons: By urging a respectful, multilateral, and sustained U.S. engagement, Jayapal is calling for a more mature, nuanced way to support Nigeria — one that respects its sovereignty while pushing for reforms and protection of its citizens.
Kindly Share:
U.S. Representative John James has publicly argued that Nnamdi Kanu’s case is a clear instance of religious persecution in Nigeria. During a hearing of the U.S. House Subcommittee on Africa, James linked Kanu’s prolonged detention and conviction to broader patterns of political and religious repression in Nigeria. James, who formerly chaired the Africa Subcommittee and is now a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, made these remarks at a public hearing held to assess President Donald Trump’s recent decision to redesignate Nigeria as a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC). The designation is reserved for nations that engage in or tolerate severe violations of religious freedom. At that hearing, which included senior U.S. State Department officials and prominent Nigerian religious leaders, James emphasized that the legal basis for Kanu’s detention had been eroded. He noted that in 2022, Nigeria’s Court of Appeal annulled the terrorism charges against Kanu and ordered his release. He further pointed out that the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention also called for Kanu’s immediate, unconditional freedom. Despite those decisions, James argued, Kanu remains in solitary confinement, in deteriorating health, and was recently forced to represent himself in court. According to James, this signals a dangerous message: the rule of law is not being respected, and Christians — or at least Christian‑aligned political figures — are being disproportionately targeted. He asserted that “the law is optional and targeting Christians is fair game.” James tied this to a deeper problem: religious persecution is being weaponized for political repression, weakening Nigeria’s institutions and undermining justice. He said that Kanu’s case is symbolic of a larger trend in which political dissent and Christian identity are conflated and criminalized. On the same day as his remarks, Kanu was again convicted — this time on all remaining charges — and sentenced to life imprisonment on terrorism-related counts. In the ruling, Judge James Omotosho held that Kanu’s broadcasts and orders via his group, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), had incited violent actions. James’s intervention at the U.S. Congressional hearing is part of a larger push by some Western lawmakers and religious freedom advocates to hold Nigeria accountable. They argue that the country’s repeated failures to protect religious minorities or to ensure fair legal processes warrant serious international attention.
Kindly Share:
The Methodist Archbishop of the Okigwe Archdiocese in Imo State, Most Rev. Livinus Biereonwu Onuagha, has strongly criticized the life imprisonment sentence issued against the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, describing it as a deep error that falls short of every principle of justice and fairness. The Archbishop expressed his disappointment while reacting to the ruling delivered by Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja. He noted that the outcome of the case has intensified already widespread doubts regarding governance, transparency, and the credibility of Nigeria’s judicial structure. According to Archbishop Onuagha, the judgment represents not only a legal setback but also a moral and ethical failure that continues to fuel national tension. He emphasized that such a ruling reinforces public mistrust in institutions that are expected to be neutral, fair, and committed to equity. He further explained that the situation has created additional emotional, political, and social concerns, especially among citizens who believe that justice must be seen to reflect truth and accountability. The Archbishop maintained that decisions of this magnitude should promote national unity, not trigger deeper frustration or escalate doubts in the legal system. In his remarks, the cleric stated that the ruling has contributed to growing public anxiety because many Nigerians view justice as selective, inconsistent, or influenced by political pressures. His reaction echoed a sentiment shared by a large number of citizens who feel that equitable legal judgment is essential for sustaining peace and national stability. By describing the sentence as a grave misjudgement, the Archbishop stressed that the justice system must uphold integrity and impartiality to maintain trust. He urged the relevant authorities to reflect on the ruling’s implications and consider how it affects national cohesion and the people’s confidence in the courts.
Kindly Share:
A Nigerian lawyer and political commentator, Malcolm Emokiniovo Omirhobo, has argued that the life sentence handed to the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, has once again uncovered what he describes as a troubling example of Nigeria’s selective justice system. According to him, the judgment highlights a deeply rooted imbalance where certain individuals face swift and severe punishment from the justice system, while others—despite being openly associated with actions or statements that could attract similar or even more serious charges—continue to move freely without scrutiny or accountability. Omirhobo stressed that the contrasting treatment between Kanu and individuals like Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, who remains unrestricted, raises serious questions about fairness, rule of law, and equal treatment of citizens. He noted that this disparity strongly suggests the existence of a two-layered justice structure—one that aggressively prosecutes some Nigerians, while simultaneously protecting others who are seen by the public as having engaged in comparable or more controversial activities. He emphasized that this situation reflects a disturbing reality in which legal consequences depend not only on actions but often on identity, political sentiment, region, ethnic background, or perceived alignment with those in authority. This, he said, reinforces the belief among many citizens that justice in Nigeria is not always blind, impartial, or consistent. The lawyer maintained that such uneven administration of justice threatens national unity, increases distrust in government institutions, and fuels the perception that some individuals are above the law while others are subjected to excessive punishment. He warned that unless these contradictions are addressed, Nigeria risks deepening feelings of alienation, resentment, and marginalization among the groups who believe they are routinely targeted. Omirhobo concluded that the sentencing of Nnamdi Kanu, while figures like Sheikh Gumi remain untouched, stands as a powerful example of selective justice and a reminder of the urgent need for reforms to ensure equity, transparency, and credibility within Nigeria’s justice system.
Kindly Share:
The Director of the Africa Programme at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Oge Onubogu, has issued a strong caution regarding the idea of a possible United States military intervention aimed at addressing Nigeria’s security challenges. According to her, such an aggressive move could create additional risks for vulnerable groups, especially Christian communities living in highly unstable regions. Onubogu delivered this warning on Thursday during a hearing held in the United States Congress. The session was organized by the House Subcommittee on Africa, which convened to review and evaluate former President Donald Trump’s decision to place Nigeria back on the Country of Particular Concern (CPC) list. During the hearing, she emphasized that deploying American military force within Nigeria’s borders could escalate underlying tensions rather than resolve them. She explained that international military involvement, particularly from a global power like the US, may unintentionally worsen instability and expose Christian populations to greater threats instead of providing the intended protection. Her remarks highlighted the need for diplomatic engagement, strengthened local security strategies, and cooperative peacebuilding efforts instead of direct foreign military intervention. She stressed that sustainable solutions to Nigeria’s insecurity require collaborative support, institutional reinforcement, and improved governance, rather than foreign military operations that could alter local dynamics in unpredictable ways. As deliberations in Congress continue, Onubogu’s warning underscores the importance of carefully assessing the potential consequences of inserting US military forces into Nigeria’s internal security issues. Her contribution served as a reminder that well-intentioned interventions may carry unintended outcomes, particularly for communities already facing dangers on multiple fronts.
Kindly Share:
United States Senator Ted Cruz has stepped forward to outline the forthcoming measures regarding the reported large-scale targeted killings of Christians in Nigeria. The senator’s statement comes amid mounting concerns over the increasing violence against religious minorities in the country. LMSINT MEDIA highlights that this issue has garnered international attention, especially after former US President Donald Trump designated Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC). This designation specifically referenced the systematic and violent attacks on Christians, which have been reported in several regions across Nigeria. In his announcement, Senator Cruz emphasized that the United States is closely monitoring the situation. He revealed that further steps would involve policy measures and potential diplomatic interventions aimed at ensuring that the perpetrators—Islamic extremist groups allegedly responsible for the massacres—are held accountable. Previously, President Trump had indicated that the US military might consider direct involvement in Nigeria to counter the extremist organizations believed to be behind these killings. This alarming development underscores the gravity of the attacks, which have continued to claim the lives of numerous innocent civilians. Senator Cruz’s remarks serve as a reminder that the international community is paying close attention to the crisis. The potential involvement of the United States could significantly influence Nigeria’s national security strategies, as well as prompt increased global pressure on local authorities to take decisive action against the perpetrators of religious violence. The situation has raised concerns among human rights organizations, faith-based advocacy groups, and international policymakers, all calling for stronger measures to protect vulnerable Christian communities in Nigeria. As the issue develops, updates from US lawmakers and Nigerian authorities will be critical in understanding the next steps toward justice and security. For further details on related religious persecution cases worldwide, readers can explore reports by the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF).
Kindly Share:
President Bola Tinubu is once again at the center of intense public outrage as Nigeria grapples with yet another wave of violent insecurity. The latest uproar stems from two devastating incidents that have deepened national anxiety: the killing of a respected senior military officer, Brigadier General Uba, and the shocking abduction of approximately 25 schoolgirls in Kebbi State. Across social platforms, community forums, and national conversations, angry citizens are demanding immediate answers from the president, accusing the government of failing to curb the escalating crisis. Many believe that the current administration has not taken decisive action to dismantle the networks responsible for these recurring tragedies—particularly mass kidnappings involving schoolchildren and deadly attacks on security personnel. The killing of Brigadier General Uba has further raised concerns about the boldness of criminal groups, who now appear to be capable of targeting even high-ranking officers without consequences. His death has reignited conversations about the morale of military forces, operational gaps, intelligence failures, and the overall direction of Nigeria’s security structure. Similarly, the abduction of the Kebbi schoolgirls has revived painful memories of previous mass kidnappings, including Chibok, Dapchi, and Jangebe. Parents and local leaders in Kebbi are calling for swift rescue operations, reiterating that the trauma of losing children to bandits is becoming an unbearable trend. Citizens are demanding stronger leadership, better security coordination, and transparent strategies for protecting schools across the country. Many Nigerians believe that unless firm actions are taken, both rural and urban communities will continue to live under constant fear of attacks, kidnappings, and high-profile assassinations. As the pressure mounts, Nigerians are watching closely to see how President Tinubu will address the growing backlash—and whether his administration will finally implement durable solutions to restore peace, confidence, and security across the nation.
Kindly Share:
The Lagos State House of Assembly has officially overturned the nomination of Mrs. Adebisi Adelabu as the General Manager of the Lagos State Parking Authority (LASPAA).This resolution was reached during the Assembly’s plenary session held on Monday, where legislators reviewed the screening committee’s findings before making their final decision. According to a statement shared with LMSINT MEDIA on Monday evening, the Chairman of the Screening Committee, Hon. Mojeed Fatai, confirmed that the committee had thoroughly examined all relevant details concerning her nomination. After presenting its comprehensive report before the House, the lawmakers collectively agreed to reject and nullify her appointment. During the plenary, the Assembly emphasized its commitment to ensuring that every leadership position within state agencies aligns with statutory requirements, proper screening procedures, and public expectations.The decision reflects the lawmakers’ resolve to uphold due process and ensure that individuals occupying sensitive public roles meet established standards. Hon. Fatai noted that the committee’s findings were carefully evaluated before the House adopted its final position. The unanimous agreement of the Assembly members further demonstrated the weight of the committee’s recommendations and the importance placed on credible leadership within Lagos State’s administrative structure. The Lagos State Parking Authority, LASPAA, plays a central role in regulating parking policies and improving transportation orderliness across the state. Therefore, the Assembly stressed the need for capable leadership to drive efficient and transparent operations within the agency. With the nullification now approved, the government is expected to initiate fresh procedures to fill the position with another nominee who satisfies all necessary criteria and aligns with the state’s strategic objectives.
