Tinubu’s Emergency Declaration in Rivers State: FG Clears Wike of Involvement The Federal Government has justified President Bola Tinubu’s decision to impose a state of emergency in Rivers State, citing the need to prevent a total breakdown of governance. The Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, emphasized that the move was in response to the deteriorating political situation and that Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, was not responsible for the crisis. Speaking at a press briefing in Abuja, Fagbemi assured that Rivers State’s financial allocations would be managed by Vice Admiral Ibok-Étè Ibas (retd.), who has been appointed as the state’s sole administrator. “If the administrator requests it, the allocation will be released to him. This decision aligns with the extraordinary situation that has taken the state out of the regular governance process,” Fagbemi stated. Timely Intervention to Prevent Governance Collapse The AGF underscored the necessity of Tinubu’s intervention, arguing that further delays could have worsened the political turmoil in Rivers State. He clarified that the President had exhausted all mediation efforts before resorting to emergency measures. “This administration still has about two years left. Should the President have waited until the situation spiraled completely out of control? I don’t think so,” he explained. The Political Tension in Rivers State President Tinubu declared the state of emergency on March 18, 2025, suspending Governor Siminalayi Fubara, Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu, and all members of the Rivers State House of Assembly for an initial six-month period. The crisis stemmed from a prolonged power struggle between Governor Fubara and his predecessor, Nyesom Wike, leading to disruptions in governance and raising security concerns. To restore stability, Tinubu appointed Vice Admiral Ibok-Étè Ibas (retd.), former Chief of Naval Staff (2015–2021), to oversee the state’s administration. The President justified his decision by referencing constitutional provisions. “Upon sober reflection and evaluation of the political situation in Rivers State, it has become imperative for me to invoke Section 305 of the Nigerian Constitution to declare a state of emergency with immediate effect,” Tinubu stated. Judiciary to Remain Functional Amid Emergency Rule Despite suspending the executive and legislative branches, Tinubu assured that the judiciary would remain operational to ensure legal and democratic processes continue. The emergency declaration has sparked mixed reactions across the country. While some stakeholders support the move as necessary for restoring stability, critics argue it could set a dangerous precedent for executive overreach. Conclusion The situation in Rivers State remains a significant political flashpoint. The coming months will reveal whether Tinubu’s decision stabilizes governance or escalates tensions further. For more insights into Nigeria’s constitutional laws, refer to Section 305 of the Constitution. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Article: Governor Siminalayi Fubara has vacated the Rivers State Government House in Port Harcourt, along with his family and security team, following President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in the state. Reports confirm that Fubara left the government residence on Wednesday morning, a day after his suspension alongside Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu and all elected members of the Rivers State House of Assembly. The suspension, announced during a national broadcast by President Tinubu, is set to last for an initial period of six months. In his address, President Tinubu stated: “By this declaration, the Governor of Rivers State, Mr. Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, Mrs. Ngozi Odu, and all elected members of the House of Assembly of Rivers State are hereby suspended for an initial period of six months.” As part of the emergency directives, the President appointed Vice Admiral Ibok-Étè Ibas (retd.) as the sole administrator responsible for overseeing governance in Rivers State until stability is restored. Mixed Reactions to the Emergency Rule The emergency rule in Rivers State has triggered nationwide debates, with opinions sharply divided. While some view it as a necessary step to restore order, others argue that it represents an excessive use of executive power, undermining democratic principles. According to political analysts, the suspension of an elected governor and lawmakers raises concerns about the balance of power and the federal government’s role in state affairs. A reputable political affairs journal, Premium Times, highlights the constitutional implications of the decision, questioning whether it aligns with Nigeria’s democratic framework. Political Implications and Future Prospects The unfolding situation in Rivers State could set a precedent for federal interventions in state governance. Political stakeholders are calling for a legal review of the emergency rule, with some advocating for the restoration of the state’s duly elected government. As tensions rise, citizens and observers alike await further developments, particularly regarding the legal and constitutional challenges that may arise in response to the state of emergency. Read more on the constitutional debate surrounding the emergency rule READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
In a significant legal decision, a U.S. federal judge has temporarily suspended the Trump administration’s policy prohibiting transgender individuals from serving in the military. This ruling, grounded in the constitutional principle of equality, marks a setback for former President Donald Trump’s policy agenda. Judicial Stand for Equality Judge Ana C. Reyes referenced the U.S. Declaration of Independence, which affirms that all individuals are “created equal,” as she temporarily blocked the enforcement of Trump’s executive order issued in late January. The suspension remains in effect until March 21, allowing the government time to appeal for an emergency stay at a higher court. This ruling is a challenge to the Trump administration’s broader attempts to roll back protections for minority groups since assuming office. Trump’s Controversial Policy Trump’s January 27 executive order declared that individuals who “express a false ‘gender identity’ divergent from their sex cannot meet the rigorous standards required for military service.” He further asserted that the U.S. government would only recognize two immutable sexes—male and female. According to estimates, approximately 15,000 transgender personnel serve in the U.S. military, which has a total force of nearly two million. Strong Criticism from the Judiciary Judge Reyes’s ruling included particularly strong language, denouncing the policy as discriminatory and unfounded. “The Military Ban is soaked in animus and dripping with pretext,” she stated. “Its language is unabashedly demeaning, its policy stigmatizes transgender persons as inherently unfit, and its conclusions bear no relation to fact.” She further emphasized that the government could develop a policy that balances military preparedness with constitutional protections but concluded that the current ban fails to achieve that balance. Military Directives and Policy Shifts In February, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a directive preventing new transgender enlistments and halting gender transition treatments for active-duty personnel. Additionally, the Pentagon announced plans to discharge transgender service members unless they secure a waiver on a case-by-case basis. The stance on transgender military service has fluctuated significantly in recent years. The Obama administration lifted the ban in 2016, but subsequent administrations—including Trump’s and Biden’s—have altered these policies, reflecting the broader political divide over transgender rights in the United States. Legal Battle Continues The current ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by a group of transgender individuals, including active service members and aspiring recruits, who argue that Trump’s policy is unconstitutional. This case represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over transgender rights in the military. As legal proceedings continue, the future of transgender individuals serving in the U.S. military remains uncertain. The Washington Post for additional updates on this legal battle. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Chanel.
Kindly Share:
Rivers State Crisis: Communities Warn of Potential Guerrilla Warfare Less than 24 hours after President Bola Ahmed Tinubu declared a state of emergency in Rivers State, oil and gas-producing communities in the Niger Delta have raised concerns that this decision could ignite guerrilla warfare in the region. The alarm follows the recent explosion on the Trans-Niger oil pipeline in Bodo, Gokana Local Government Area, an incident believed to be linked to ex-militants disgruntled over pipeline surveillance contract exclusions. Political Instability Could Escalate Economic Crisis Speaking with Vanguard, Joseph Ambakaderimo, Chairman of the Board of Trustees (BoT) of the Community Development Committees (CDC) of Niger Delta Oil and Gas-Producing Areas, warned that the political turmoil in Rivers State could severely impact Nigeria’s economy if not handled with diplomacy. He criticized the president’s decision, stating, “Declaring a state of emergency under these circumstances is premature and could provoke a larger crisis. If this spirals into guerrilla warfare, the economic damage will be enormous.” Ambakaderimo further revealed that certain ex-militants, previously engaged in pipeline surveillance, feel neglected and may be resorting to sabotage to draw attention to their plight. Urgent Need to Reassess Pipeline Surveillance Contracts He emphasized that the federal government must immediately review the surveillance contracts to promote inclusivity and avoid further sabotage. “With only two out of six NLNG Train operations currently functional, the country is already facing a gas shortage. If crude oil production is similarly affected, the economy will suffer drastic consequences,” he noted. He recommended that the government engage the CDC to mediate between stakeholders and ensure equitable contract distribution. Governor Fubara Urged to Seek Presidential Dialogue Despite the emergency declaration, Ambakaderimo encouraged Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara to seek diplomatic dialogue with President Tinubu through respected statesmen to facilitate a reversal of the decision. He also condemned the 27 state lawmakers for ignoring a Supreme Court ruling while focusing on political maneuvering to impeach Governor Fubara, allegedly at the behest of political leader Nyesom Wike. “Governor Fubara has attempted to uphold the court’s judgment, even at personal risk, while lawmakers prioritize political interests. They rejected the governor’s budget proposal and acted against judicial directives,” he asserted. State of Emergency Threatens Oil Production Stability Ambakaderimo reiterated that escalating political conflicts could reduce daily crude oil output, posing significant economic threats. “A well-thought-out approach is needed. Reversing the emergency decision would demonstrate the administration’s commitment to national stability and economic growth,” he concluded. Vanguard News on Rivers State Crisis READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
The recent declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has triggered intense reactions across Nigeria. Various stakeholders, including the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), legal analysts, political figures, and groups such as the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Ijaw Youths, have expressed divergent opinions. While many have criticized the move, others see it as a strategic intervention in the unfolding political turmoil. Hon. Obidike Chukwuebuka, a prominent member of the All Progressives Congress (APC), has praised President Tinubu’s decision, stating that Governor Siminalayi Fubara should be grateful for the intervention. According to Obidike, Tinubu’s move effectively prevented an imminent impeachment that could have led to Fubara’s removal from office. In a statement shared with Vanguard on Wednesday, Obidike highlighted Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, which empowers the President to declare a state of emergency, thereby suspending the authority of the Governor, Deputy Governor, and other state government structures. He argued that this legal provision granted Tinubu the authority to stabilize Rivers State’s governance during the crisis. Although reports of an impeachment plot against Governor Fubara remain unverified, Tinubu’s intervention has undoubtedly reshaped the state’s political dynamics. His efforts to foster peace and cooperation were further demonstrated in a recent high-level meeting involving Fubara and key stakeholders. The President reportedly emphasized the need for unity and political stability to ensure effective governance in Rivers State. “As developments continue to unfold, it is evident that Governor Fubara’s political trajectory is closely linked to President Tinubu’s influence,” Obidike remarked, suggesting that the intervention could have long-term ramifications for the state’s governance. Read more about Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution and state of emergency provisions READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
APC Supports Emergency Rule in Rivers State, Faults Governor Fubara The All Progressives Congress (APC) has thrown its full support behind President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State. The ruling party claims that Governor Siminalayi Fubara’s actions directly led to the extreme decision, which was necessary to restore governance and security in the state. APC’s Accusations Against Fubara In a statement released by the party’s spokesperson, Felix Morka, the APC highlighted several alleged unconstitutional actions by Governor Fubara. The party asserted that the governor’s decisions effectively crippled governance in Rivers State. Morka stated: The APC emphasized that no government can function without a legislature and judiciary, as all three arms of government must coexist for legitimate governance. Supreme Court’s Position & Tinubu’s Justification Citing a ruling from the Supreme Court of Nigeria, the APC noted that Rivers State lacked a functioning government due to Fubara’s unconstitutional actions. According to Morka, Fubara’s choices led to instability, creating conditions that necessitated the declaration of emergency rule. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s decision to impose emergency rule was a constitutionally-backed measure aimed at protecting the lives and property of Rivers State residents. The APC insisted that the safety and well-being of the citizens must take priority over political interests. Tinubu’s Leadership in Crisis Management The APC praised President Tinubu for his decisive action in preventing a total breakdown of law and order in the state. According to the party, his intervention reflects strong leadership and commitment to national stability. Conclusion The political crisis in Rivers State has sparked intense debate, with APC placing the blame squarely on Governor Fubara. As tensions continue to escalate, all eyes remain on the presidency and judicial institutions for the next course of action. For more updates on this developing story, visit Premium Times. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Dangote Refinery Seeks to Halt Fuel Imports Amid Legal Dispute A Nigerian Federal High Court has dismissed an objection from state-owned NNPC Ltd regarding its inclusion in a lawsuit filed by Dangote Oil Refinery. The case, initiated by Africa’s largest refinery, seeks to prevent fuel imports into Nigeria, arguing that its production capacity is sufficient to meet the nation’s gasoline demand. Background: Dangote Refinery’s Push for Energy Independence The 650,000-barrel-per-day Dangote Refinery, commissioned in Lagos, aims to reduce Nigeria’s dependence on imported refined petroleum. Despite being an oil-producing nation, Nigeria has historically relied on fuel imports due to limited refining capacity. The refinery, owned by billionaire Aliko Dangote, has positioned itself as a solution to the country’s energy crisis. Lawsuit Challenges Fuel Importation In its legal filing, Dangote Refinery contends that the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Agency (NMDPRA) is breaching the law by continuing to issue fuel import permits. The lawsuit demands ₦100 billion ($65 million) in damages from NMDPRA, NNPC, and several smaller fuel marketers, citing that imports should only be allowed if there’s a supply shortfall. The refinery argues that it began producing gasoline in September last year and is capable of supplying the country’s needs. NNPC’s Argument and Court’s Ruling NNPC opposed the lawsuit, asserting that domestic fuel consumption still surpasses Dangote’s production capacity, necessitating imports. It also pointed out that the lawsuit erroneously named Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation, a non-existent entity, as the company had been rebranded as Nigeria National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd) in 2022. However, presiding Judge Inyang Ekwo dismissed NNPC’s objections, allowing the case to proceed. A final ruling is expected on May 6, when the court will evaluate NNPC and NMDPRA’s motion to dismiss the case on grounds of insufficient merit. Fuel Market Implications & Government Response Nigeria, home to one of Africa’s largest gasoline markets, spent ₦15.42 trillion ($10 billion) on fuel imports in 2023, according to the National Bureau of Statistics. This lawsuit marks yet another confrontation between Dangote Group and Nigerian regulators, with the refinery previously accusing NMDPRA of permitting substandard fuel imports and failing to enforce domestic crude supply laws. Regulatory bodies have denied these claims. What’s Next? As the legal battle continues, stakeholders within Nigeria’s petroleum industry are closely watching how the decision will impact the country’s fuel supply policies. With the government’s push for economic diversification and self-sufficiency in oil refining, the outcome of this lawsuit could set a precedent for fuel regulation and refinery operations in Nigeria. Read more about Nigeria’s fuel importation policies on Reuters. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
National Assembly Was Briefed Before Rivers Crisis Declaration – Hon. Rotimi House of Representatives spokesperson, Hon. Akin Rotimi, has confirmed that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu duly consulted the National Assembly before announcing his decision regarding the political crisis in Rivers State. In an official statement released in Abuja on Tuesday, Rotimi emphasized that key leaders within the National Assembly, including Senate President Senator Godswill Akpabio, Speaker of the House Hon. Abbas Tajudeen, Deputy Speaker Hon. Benjamin Kalu, Senate Leader Senator Michael Bamidele, and House Leader Rep. Prof. Julius Ihonvbere, were involved in deliberations with the President and National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, ahead of the official broadcast. High-Level Security Briefing and Legislative Support Rotimi detailed the sequence of events leading to the president’s declaration, stating that the meeting also included top security officials such as: “All attendees at the meeting were fully informed of the President’s decision, and there was unanimous agreement on the necessity of the action,” Rotimi stated. Legislative Process and Next Steps Further explaining the legislative process, Rotimi confirmed that President Tinubu had sent a formal letter to the House of Representatives, seeking approval in line with Section 305 of the Nigerian Constitution. “The letter will be presented during plenary on Wednesday, March 19, 2025, and lawmakers will deliberate on the matter before deciding on the next legislative course of action,” he added. External Perspective on the Rivers Crisis The decision to declare a state of emergency in Rivers State has sparked nationwide debate. Some analysts argue that while constitutional provisions were followed, the situation might have been politically motivated. Read expert analysis on the implications of this decision. Conclusion With the National Assembly’s involvement in the consultation process, President Tinubu’s decision appears to have legislative backing. However, how lawmakers respond during the plenary session remains a key development to watch. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has strongly criticized President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s recent decision to declare a state of emergency in Rivers State and suspend Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, and the state’s House of Assembly members. In a statement released on March 18, 2025, NBA President Mazi Afam Osigwe, SAN, asserted that the President lacks the constitutional authority to unilaterally remove elected officials under the pretext of emergency rule. NBA Rejects Suspension of Elected Officials President Tinubu, during a national address, justified his actions by citing increasing political instability and pipeline vandalism in the state. However, the NBA argued that these issues do not meet the constitutional requirements for dissolving an elected government. Referencing Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, the NBA outlined that while the President holds emergency powers, they do not extend to the suspension or removal of elected officials. The only constitutional procedure for removing a governor or deputy governor, the NBA emphasized, is through impeachment as stipulated in Section 188 of the Constitution. Similarly, the removal of lawmakers must follow electoral laws and due legal process. Tinubu’s Emergency Declaration Faces Legal Hurdles The NBA further highlighted that Tinubu’s emergency declaration requires approval from the National Assembly within two days (if in session) or ten days (if not in session). Until such approval is obtained, the suspension of Rivers State’s government officials remains legally void. Condemning the President’s decision as a “dangerous violation” of Nigeria’s democracy, the NBA warned that allowing the dissolution of an elected state government under emergency rule could establish a precedent for politically motivated takeovers in the future. NBA Urges National Assembly to Uphold Democracy The association called on the National Assembly to reject any attempt to ratify the unconstitutional suspension of Rivers State’s government. It also urged the judiciary, civil society organizations, and international observers to closely monitor the situation and ensure that democratic principles are upheld. Reaffirming its commitment to safeguarding the rule of law, the NBA emphasized that Nigeria’s democracy must be protected at all costs. The association insisted that all political disputes be resolved strictly through constitutional and legal mechanisms rather than executive orders. Nigerian Constitution READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
Soldiers Take Over Rivers Government House After Tinubu Declares State of Emergency In a dramatic turn of events, heavily armed soldiers have taken control of the Rivers State Government House in Port Harcourt following President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in the state. Eyewitness reports confirm that an Armoured Personnel Carrier (APC) has been positioned at the entrance of the Government House on Azikiwe Road. It remains unclear whether Governor Siminalayi Fubara was inside the premises when military forces moved in around 9 PM. Tension Rises as Residents Flee Amid Political Uncertainty The sudden deployment of military personnel has created tension among residents, many of whom rushed home out of fear of escalating violence. The declaration by President Tinubu came amid the ongoing political power struggle between Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his predecessor, Nyesom Wike, now the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). President Tinubu’s Justification for the State of Emergency In his national broadcast, President Tinubu cited the persistent political turmoil in Rivers State as the reason for his decision, stating that all political interventions had failed to resolve the crisis. He announced: “By this declaration, the Governor of Rivers State, Mr. Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, Mrs. Ngozi Odu, and all elected members of the House of Assembly of Rivers State are hereby suspended for six months. In the meantime, Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas (retd.) has been appointed as the Administrator to oversee the state’s affairs in the best interest of the people. This decision does not affect the judicial arm of the state, which will continue to function in accordance with its constitutional mandate.” Governor Fubara’s Response and Call for Calm Reacting to the suspension, Governor Siminalayi Fubara released a statement urging residents to remain calm. He emphasized his commitment to democratic principles and reassured the people of Rivers State that he would work through constitutional channels to challenge the decision. In his statement titled “Press Release by the Executive Governor of Rivers State,” Fubara accused lawmakers loyal to Nyesom Wike of frustrating his efforts to comply with the Supreme Court ruling. He stated: “My dear Rivers people, I address you today with a deep sense of responsibility and calm as we navigate this difficult moment in our state’s political history. From the onset of my administration, I have remained committed to constitutional order, the protection of lives and property, and the progress of our dear state. Even in the face of political instability, we have prioritized the rule of law and the interests of the people above personal ambitions.” Legal and Political Experts Condemn the Move While the federal government insists that the state of emergency is necessary to restore order, political analysts and legal experts have criticized the decision. Several prominent figures have described it as unconstitutional, arguing that the suspension of elected officials undermines democracy. Renowned constitutional lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) remarked in an interview that the move sets a dangerous precedent and could face legal challenges in court. (Source: Legit.ng) What’s Next for Rivers State? With Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas (retd.) now overseeing governance in Rivers State, stakeholders are watching closely to see how the situation unfolds. Many anticipate legal battles and possible public protests in response to what critics call an undemocratic decision. For now, the people of Rivers State remain on edge, awaiting further developments in what has become one of the most contentious political crises in recent Nigerian history. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
The Rivers State Government has expressed deep shock over President Bola Tinubu’s decision to remove Governor Siminalayi Fubara while allowing the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, to remain in office despite accusations of fueling the state’s political crisis. Unfair Dismissal of Governor Fubara In a statement released by the Rivers State Commissioner for Information and Communications, Warisenibo Joe Johnson, the government strongly condemned the decision, describing it as unjust. Johnson highlighted that Governor Fubara has consistently upheld constitutional order, peace, and good governance despite ongoing political instability. Since assuming office, Fubara has prioritized the safety of lives and property while fostering the progress of Rivers State. Even amidst political turmoil, he has remained committed to his constitutional duties, placing the interests of the people above personal or political considerations. Compliance with Peace Agreement and Court Rulings Following President Tinubu’s intervention to resolve the crisis, the Rivers State Government demonstrated good faith by implementing the agreed terms, including reinstating commissioners who had previously resigned. Additionally, the government promptly adhered to the Supreme Court ruling upon receiving the certified true copy of the judgment, further reinforcing its commitment to the rule of law and democratic governance. Lawmakers Aligned with Wike Undermining Peace Despite these efforts, lawmakers loyal to Wike—who previously served as Rivers State Governor—have continued to disrupt stability and hinder peace. Johnson expressed disbelief that while Fubara was removed, Wike, the alleged mastermind behind the crisis, was left untouched. “It is shocking that Mr. President dismissed the governor while allowing his minister, who is the principal actor, to remain in office,” Johnson stated. Governance Continues Amidst Political Challenges The commissioner reassured the people of Rivers State that the government remains fully functional despite political challenges. Salaries continue to be paid, developmental projects are progressing, and the security of the state remains intact. At this crucial moment, the Rivers State Government has called on citizens to remain peaceful and law-abiding while reaffirming its commitment to working with all relevant institutions to uphold democracy and ensure continued progress. “We have always been a resilient people, and we will navigate this situation with wisdom, patience, and unwavering faith in the democratic process,” Johnson added. Commitment to Rivers State’s Progress The Rivers State Government maintains its dedication to prioritizing the welfare and prosperity of its citizens despite the ongoing political turbulence. For more context on Nigeria’s political landscape, visit Premium Times. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
South-South Leaders Decry Emergency Rule in Rivers State The declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has sparked widespread criticism from South-South leaders and political stakeholders. Many have labeled the move as unconstitutional and a direct attempt to take control of the oil-rich region, further fueling tensions. Former Akwa Ibom Attorney General Calls Move “Ill-Advised” Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Uwemedimo Nwoko, a former Attorney General of Akwa Ibom State, strongly opposed the emergency rule, stating it does not align with constitutional provisions. According to him, “The conditions required for a state of emergency have not been met. This decision appears to be a calculated political maneuver rather than a legitimate action.” Ijaw Youth Council Rejects Tinubu’s Decision Ex-President of the Ijaw Youth Council (IYC), Eric Omare, also condemned the decision, asserting that President Tinubu’s intervention has been biased. “Removing Governor Siminalayi Fubara will not resolve the crisis. Instead, it emboldens those fueling the conflict,” Omare stated. He further accused the administration of favoring the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister, Nyesom Wike, who has been at the center of the controversy. PANDEF Monitoring the Situation The Pan Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF), the apex socio-political body for the South-South geopolitical zone, has expressed grave concern over the development. PANDEF spokesperson Chief Obiuwevbi Ominimini stated, “We are seriously alarmed by the state of emergency imposed in Rivers State. This crisis was avoidable, and we will soon release our official stance on the matter.” Ex-MOSIEND Spokesperson Questions Political Motives Amaebi Clarkson, former national spokesman of the Movement for the Survival of Ijaw Ethnic Nationality in the Niger Delta (MOSIEND), believes the move is politically motivated ahead of the 2027 elections. “The president’s actions suggest a well-orchestrated script to seize control of Rivers State,” Clarkson remarked. He further accused Wike of instigating the crisis and the federal government of turning a blind eye to his actions. Ijaw Youth Council Calls It “Oppression” The Ijaw Youth Council, represented by spokesman Amb. Binebai Princewill, labeled the emergency rule as “oppression and intimidation of Ijaw people.” According to Princewill, “There are states grappling with severe insurgencies from Boko Haram and herdsmen, yet no emergency rule was declared. This targeted action against Rivers State raises serious concerns.” APC Chieftain Urges Reconciliation Elder statesman and APC chieftain in Edo State, Hon. Charles Idahosa, sees the situation as an opportunity for resolution. “Fubara, lawmakers, and the FCT Minister must come together and find common ground. The presidency had previously tried to mediate, but the parties involved failed to cooperate. Now is the time to resolve their differences.” Conclusion The emergency rule in Rivers State has triggered national debate, with critics questioning the constitutional basis of the decision. While the Nigerian Bar Association and South-South stakeholders have spoken against the move, the federal government insists it is necessary to restore order. For a deeper understanding of the constitutional implications, read this analysis by a legal expert. The Guardian – Nigerian Political Crisis READ ALSO; Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
Kindly Share:
In an unprecedented move, Nigeria’s President, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has declared a state of emergency in Rivers State, a key oil-producing region, leading to the suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara and the state’s lawmakers for six months. This decision follows escalating political tensions and increased pipeline vandalism affecting Nigeria’s oil output. Emergency Declared Over Political Crisis and Pipeline Vandalism The crisis in Rivers State has been intensifying for months due to a power struggle between the incumbent governor and state legislators, many of whom are loyal to his predecessor. This week, lawmakers initiated impeachment proceedings against Governor Fubara, accusing him of constitutional violations, including irregularities in the state budget presentation and the composition of the legislative chamber. Amidst these tensions, reports surfaced of multiple acts of pipeline vandalism, including an explosion on the Trans-Niger Pipeline, which contributes significantly to Nigeria’s crude oil exports. President Tinubu, in a national address, cited the governor’s failure to prevent these incidents as a key reason for imposing emergency rule. Military Administrator Appointed to Govern Rivers State Following the suspension of the governor and legislators, President Tinubu appointed retired Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas, a former Chief of Naval Staff, as the military administrator of Rivers State. The judiciary will continue to function, ensuring the state maintains legal and institutional operations. Military trucks were swiftly deployed to the Rivers State Government House to enforce the emergency directives. Legal Concerns and Historical Context The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has strongly criticized the president’s decision, arguing that suspending elected officials is unconstitutional. NBA President Afam Osigwe stated, “A declaration of emergency does not automatically dissolve or suspend elected state governments.” This move marks the first state of emergency declaration in Nigeria in over a decade. The last such declaration was in 2013 under President Goodluck Jonathan in the northeastern states of Adamawa, Borno, and Yobe, during the peak of the Boko Haram insurgency. However, at that time, state governors remained in office. Implications for Nigeria’s Democracy and Oil Sector The suspension of elected officials has sparked concerns over democratic governance in Nigeria, a country with a history of military rule. Additionally, the escalating crisis in Rivers State threatens the stability of Nigeria’s oil sector, which is critical to the nation’s economy. For more updates on Nigeria’s political developments and the impact on the oil sector, visit BBC News. READ ALSO: Follow the LMSINT MEDIA channel on WhatsApp: Join Our WhatsApp Group Hear: Chat on WhatsApp Join our Telegram Channel
