Presidential Appointment of Bwala as Special Adviser: A Blow to Party Loyalists

A known critic and vocal opponent who had disparaged President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR, during the political campaign period has recently been rewarded with an appointment, under the guise of inclusivity and collaboration with opposition members.

While it is commendable that the President was urged to show grace in victory and extend cooperation to the opposition for national growth and political stability, appointing someone known for harsh criticisms has caused discontent among party loyalists. This has led to frustration and disillusionment among those who supported the party’s success with unwavering dedication.

The announcement of this appointment sparked various reactions, including audio-visual commentaries and written pieces, highlighting the perceived injustice towards loyal party supporters who devoted their resources and efforts to the party but have not been rewarded or recognized.

Many dedicated party members at different government levels feel neglected, as political appointments often bypass them in favor of individuals from opposing sides. This trend, which has become a norm across successive administrations, undermines the principle that one should benefit from where they have invested their efforts. Instead, it seems that those who were once adversarial to the party now reap the rewards.

A critical question arises: Why would a party overlook its most committed members and instead reward those who worked against its success?

Potential Risks of the Presidency’s Decision

Appointing a known critic from the opposition over loyal members can have significant repercussions. Although it may promote inclusivity, the drawbacks often outweigh the benefits.

Key potential consequences include:

Internal Conflict and Polarization: Appointing opposition figures can escalate tensions and divisions within the party.

Trust and Loyalty Concerns: The reliability of former critics may be questioned, potentially weakening trust and unity within the government. This could erode members’ confidence and lead to a decline in their participation and commitment.

Operational Efficiency: Including vocal critics may slow down decision-making due to fears of information leaks, which could hinder the government’s ability to respond promptly to urgent issues.

Member Attrition: Loyal members feeling sidelined may withdraw from the party, weakening its foundation and jeopardizing its future electoral prospects.

In closing, it is vital for all levels of government—federal, state, and local—to prioritize and reward the dedication of party loyalists over individuals whose allegiance may be uncertain. As the saying goes, “A word is enough for the wise.”

READ ALSO:

According to reports, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is in a coma, and at a secret meeting, his son was selected as his successor.